|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 24, 2015, 10:44 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Best Semi-Auto Defensive Shotgun Under $1000
What would you all consider the best semi-auto defensive shotgun not exceeding $1000. I have been looking at the Remington 1100, and the Mossberg 930, any downsides to either of these two models? Appreciate any recommendations or input.
|
August 24, 2015, 10:58 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,299
|
|
August 25, 2015, 03:58 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
1100 has been around, basically unchanged, since the early 60s; with a minimum of care they'll last that long and then some without any major issues.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
August 25, 2015, 04:21 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2000
Location: Somewhere in 14T NT
Posts: 730
|
I got my slightly used (small scuff in the handguard and VERY lint surface rust on the barrel that came out with some CLP and a bush) Benelli Tactical for $800 this spring. Great gun although I did upgrade parts like the extended magazine, hammer and sear (922r compliance) and put on a lImb saver buttpad. Deals are out there, just be ready to jump when one comes your way.
|
August 25, 2015, 04:28 PM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 8, 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 2,119
|
I'm no shotgun expert, and I have an 1100 that works well. IIRC it does have a O-ring problem that can cause reliability issues.
I keep mine around as a backup, but I'd personally first go with a pump gun. Much less expensive and as long as you train, which you should do anyway, you won't short-shuck it. |
August 25, 2015, 06:39 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2012
Location: Williamsburg, Va.
Posts: 1,528
|
I have had 1100s since 1963 and I have never had an O ring go bad. I have one that has been in service since 1967 and over 100,000 rounds. Call it a test in progress. They do not move in service, they get torn by ham handedness during assembly and disassembly. The reliability issue is a myth UNLESS someone installed a cheap rubber plumber's O ring. Lubricants dissolve those.
__________________
What could have happened... did. |
August 25, 2015, 06:42 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2000
Posts: 1,082
|
I say Benelli M3.....and converts to pump-action as well as semi-automatic with a simple twist. But I confess I don't know how much they cost now. Think I paid $900 20 years ago
|
August 25, 2015, 11:46 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
The Benelli's are nice, and if I did come across a good deal I would jump on it, but from my experience most people think their guns are worth their weight in gold, and cant understand the concept that used guns sell for less than what they paid new, so I won't hold my breath. |
|
August 26, 2015, 07:35 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 7, 2014
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 543
|
I like the pump guns myself , but the 1100 is smooth shooting very reliable for years of service thousands of tounds with very little maintanance .
That being said a thing I have seen and have shown others many times is take metal 5 gallon buckes and heavy field loads with a Remington 1100 and Browning A5 at 25/30 yards . The 1100 will rock it back and forth maby knock it over while the A5 send it flipping end over end . Its a trade off there is still plenty of energy left on the recieving end but you lose alot for that smooth firing weapon . The A5 will recoil like a pump gun while the 1100 gives you a fast follow up . The only time I have seen a damaged 0 ring on a 1100 is where it was damaged during reassembley . |
August 26, 2015, 02:01 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
|
|
August 26, 2015, 02:17 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 7, 2014
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 543
|
No you are wrong . The A5 is recoil operated the 1100 is gas . The A5 hits nearly as hard as a pump or single barrel . The 1100 bleeds of gas , thats why dove hunters prefer them for long shooting days less recoil and a little loss of power is not a bad trade off for felt recoil . If you do not have a A5 try it with a non simi shot gun instead of saying you dont buy that . Any one that has hunted with both can tell the differance . 2 of the same movable targets and same ammo .
|
August 26, 2015, 02:37 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
I just posted a new thread asking about this, so well see what some of the more knowledgeable posters will have to say about it. Last edited by Dragline45; August 26, 2015 at 02:49 PM. |
|
August 26, 2015, 02:47 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 7, 2014
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 543
|
Genarations of hunters and the reaction of moving targets say the A5 action puts more power down range than the 1100 . Not faulting the 1100 and I would prefer one for quicker follow ups . Just try this with similar firearms for yourself .
|
August 26, 2015, 03:51 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
Quote:
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
|
August 26, 2015, 04:02 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 7, 2014
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 543
|
I did cite my refrerences , set up the targets and shoot them . The old Browning action will shoot harder than the 1100 . The gas system on the 1100 does bleed of some energy that the A5 retains .
|
August 26, 2015, 06:54 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
No, YOU claiming something without data is meaningless. You state that "generations of hunters say..."
Sorry, that is as worthless as any Madison Ave marketing crap. No data= no facts Take the same loads in guns of equal length and barrel length and run them over a chrono with photo-based documentation.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
August 26, 2015, 11:54 PM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 8, 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 2,119
|
Can we skip the "my gun has more power downrange" debate. It's irrelevant to this OP topic.
Whether shot comes from an 1100 or A5 it's going to have the same deadly impact for the recipient (who is not a metal jug, but instead flesh and bone). |
August 28, 2015, 08:49 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
For defensive purposes, "The gun is the least of it."
Defensive survival skills and mastering the shotgun you have trumps choice of equipment every time.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
August 28, 2015, 08:11 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 3, 2013
Posts: 1,235
|
The OP specifically asked about the Mossberg 930. Forget the -CENSORED--CENSORED--CENSORED--CENSORED--CENSORED--CENSORED--CENSORED- contest between Remington and Mossberg, Ford and Chevy, while Mossberg is reputed to turn out a pretty good pump, its semi is another story.
The question is what is the best defensive auto loader for $1,000. I believe that means new for $1,000. don't know how the OP rates one over the other for defensibility, but I would suggest the key factor would be reliability. |
August 29, 2015, 10:57 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
|
|
August 29, 2015, 11:33 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2014
Posts: 329
|
It's a bit above your budget, but take a long look at the Baretta 1301.
|
September 1, 2015, 08:21 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2010
Posts: 857
|
The FN SLP can be found at about $1000 sometimes less. The SLP is an 18.5-inch barrel and the SLP Mark 1 is a 22-inch barrel.
FN has a variety of barrel lengths that will fit the SLP. I have the 18.5-inch barrel and a 26-inch barrel. The barrels use interchangeable Invector choke tubes. |
September 2, 2015, 08:00 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,308
|
Quote:
The M3000 (or M3K) would be a much better choice and in about the same price range. They are an inertia based system and are more reliable than either of the other two you are looking at. |
|
September 2, 2015, 03:26 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
Quote:
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
|
September 2, 2015, 03:32 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
Quote:
They all have their little quirks and advantages. Like the old adage sez, "Be familiar with your equipment."
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
|
|
|