|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 14, 2012, 09:21 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2010
Location: NE Washington
Posts: 361
|
Question about newest load manuals
Howdy,
When I started handloading, the 8th Hornady load manual had just came out, so I bought it. I saw on Midway USA that the 9th is out now. If I wanna keep shooting the same loads- i.e. powder, bullets etc- do I need this new manual, or can I just continue using the same data? Thanks in advance |
November 14, 2012, 10:08 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2012
Posts: 164
|
Keep using what you have... I used to use a book I picked up at goodwill Believe it was Lyman 45th edition, 1970.
Had the New Lee book at that time too. (last addition I think) Comparing side by side, I think they were almost the exact same. Maybe the Vol. was diff. by a few feet, but it wasn't enough for me to change loads. |
November 14, 2012, 11:06 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2010
Location: NE Washington
Posts: 361
|
Ok, because I really couldn't justify buying a $25 book if I don't absolutely need it. Thanks for the info
|
November 14, 2012, 11:19 PM | #4 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
You don't need more than one manual and you really only need that for doomsday when the Internet is gone.
Hodgdon/IMR/Winchester Alliant Nosler Vihtavouri-Lapua Ramshot and others all have their data online, for free. |
November 15, 2012, 10:01 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Location: S.E. Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 743
|
You might occassionally need a new manual if you are starting to load one of the many "newer" cartridges that may have not been listed at the time of print for your older booklet. Then again there is so much information on the internet one can go to powder manufacturers and get a lot of loads there.
|
November 15, 2012, 11:06 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Posts: 1,411
|
It is good to have at least two or more sources for any new load you want to try out. Powder and sometimes bullet manufactures will have information on the Internet or you can ask the bullet manufactures if they have load data as well. For established loads I wouldn't think you need to update you manuals unless the powder manufacture has made a change for their powder. Even then you just back off 10% and work the load up again.
|
November 15, 2012, 11:13 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,155
|
I think what happen manual # 8 was started and finished before they introduced some of their newer bullets and testing some of the newer powders. Nothing in Manual 8 about the 22 cal GMX bullets etc.
They may of jumped the gun on # 8 who knows for sure. I'll get #9.
__________________
Semper Fi Vietnam 1965 VFW Life member NRA Life Member |
November 15, 2012, 01:38 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2010
Location: NE Washington
Posts: 361
|
Good to know. I knew IMR and hodgdon had data online, but from what I remember, the bullets listed were kind of generic (i.e. 150 sp, no brand).
|
November 15, 2012, 01:51 PM | #9 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
They usually show brand, such as SIE (Sierra) or HDY (Hornady) or NOS (Nosler).
Besides which, brand doesn't matter if you're using a bullet of the same weight and similar construction, such as traditional copper jacket, lead-core bullets. There's only so many ways to make a .308 caliber lead-core, copper jacket bullet that weighs 150gr, for example. They're close enough to interchange data, so long as you start low and work up, like always.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
November 15, 2012, 02:46 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2010
Location: NE Washington
Posts: 361
|
Cool, that's kinda what I thought. I just wasn't sure if the b.c. and design of different bullets of the same weight and caliber would be enough to require entirely different data.
|
November 15, 2012, 02:57 PM | #11 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
There is some variance in length due to things like plastic tips and whatnot but as long as the basic construction is the same, and not a solid bullet like Barnes TSX versus traditional copper-jacket lead core, the variances in primers, case capacities, chamber dimensions and powder lot burn rates will more than mask any small differences in bullet length.
Starting low and working toward max also stabilizes the results, any change that produces significantly higher pressures should be reasonably evident before you reach a dangerous situation.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
November 15, 2012, 02:58 PM | #12 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
|
Also note on the Hodgdon site you have to click on the Print button to see what case, primer, and barrel length they used to get the velocities they list.
I agree that replacing a manual seldom is justified except to get new cartridge data. In Hornady's case they will usually give you data on a particular bullet and chambering combination if you ask them, so you can keep your old manual up to date that way. I usually replace a book I use a lot about every third or fourth version.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
November 15, 2012, 03:08 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2010
Location: NE Washington
Posts: 361
|
Excellent. Thanks a lot for all the info, and clarification on my question.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|