The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 26, 2019, 03:24 PM   #1
Radny97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2015
Posts: 1,021
Ruger Super GP 100 8 shot competition revolver

Let’s see:
Shimmed hammer and boss centered trigger.
Two piece tensioned barrel with target crown and cold hammer forged for accuracy.
Lightened cylinder relieved for moon clips
Smoothed competition grip
Fiber optic front sight
Uses the Super Redhawk trigger group and internals
8 shots
Good looking in my opinion


Ruger just checked all the boxes for a good competition revolver to compete in ICORE and USPSA.
When you get it home you can drop some Wolff springs in it and you’ll be off to the races.
I just might replace my 627PC.
Ruger keeps figuring out ways to take my money and i couldn’t be happier about it.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Radny97 is offline  
Old April 26, 2019, 06:09 PM   #2
stinkeypete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 22, 2010
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,293
The spec sheet says it weighs 47 oz with a 5.5” barrel... that’s 5 oz less than a 5.5” Redhawk but 9 oz more than a gp100 with a 4.2” barrel. With the scalloped cylinder and cutaway barrel... they put lead weights in the thing somewhere? Or the weight spec is wrong.

For that kind of money, I would like an accuracy spec. for out of the box.

I especially like the feature that you can shoot .38 special since it’s got “dual chambering.” Maybe they have a new kid in marketing writing this stuff?

I like the look. I don’t see how it weighs so much unless they put weights in it and if so, why lighten the barrel?

A 686 Plus weighs 38.4 oz... and costs under a grand...

Last edited by stinkeypete; April 26, 2019 at 06:17 PM.
stinkeypete is offline  
Old April 26, 2019, 07:20 PM   #3
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkeypete View Post
The spec sheet says it weighs 47 oz with a 5.5” barrel... that’s 5 oz less than a 5.5” Redhawk but 9 oz more than a gp100 with a 4.2” barrel. With the scalloped cylinder and cutaway barrel... they put lead weights in the thing somewhere? Or the weight spec is wrong.


I like the look. I don’t see how it weighs so much unless they put weights in it and if so, why lighten the barrel?
Maybe because it's built on a Redhawk frame?
Redhawk = 8 shots; GP100 = 7 shots.
74A95 is offline  
Old April 26, 2019, 07:27 PM   #4
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,568
Here's a link for people who want to know what the heck we're talking about...

https://ruger.com/products/superGP100/models.html
74A95 is offline  
Old April 26, 2019, 08:08 PM   #5
HighValleyRanch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,066
Whew, that is uglier than my LCR!
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"
HighValleyRanch is offline  
Old April 26, 2019, 09:03 PM   #6
ds-10-speed
Member
 
Join Date: November 5, 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 98
It looks interesting but it won't replace my 627 V-Comp, the DA trigger pull on my GP 100 is longer than my S&W's. For me the longer GP DA pull makes my follow up shots slower, I'm used to S&W's.



Updated accessories:

__________________
Double action pin shooter
ds-10-speed is offline  
Old April 27, 2019, 12:43 AM   #7
DaleA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
Thanks 74A95! Much appreciated.
DaleA is offline  
Old April 27, 2019, 07:18 AM   #8
44caliberkid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighValleyRanch View Post
Whew, that is uglier than my LCR!
Add my +1. That 627 Smith is gorgeous though.
44caliberkid is offline  
Old April 27, 2019, 09:43 AM   #9
Dave T
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 16, 2000
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,456
When uglier guns are built, Ruger will build them. And what's with that goofy grip angle? Does Ruger not understand that the further the wrist is from the axis of the bore, the greater felt recoil will be? No, apparently they don't!

Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD Ret
Dave T is offline  
Old April 27, 2019, 06:48 PM   #10
Carl the Floor Walker
member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2017
Location: South
Posts: 1,422
I have two LCR's which I really admire for many reasons. Actually own about 6 Rugers. However, I have to say I will never buy another Ruger product again. The quality control has gone down hill so much, and now just a bunch of Budget semi autos.
Now this ugly looking gun at over $1500. What is Ruger on these days?

Sorry Ruger if I pass, I will just buy two Kimbers for the money. Thanks anyway.
Carl the Floor Walker is offline  
Old April 28, 2019, 12:44 AM   #11
TruthTellers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,888
Just when I think I'm being too hard on Ruger, they drop this to further boggle my mind. Somebody in marketing must have looked at what the intention of this revolver was and said, "We can't call it a Redhawk because that's too plain, but we can't call it a Super Redhawk because it's not a Super Redhawk. Hey, let's call it a Super GP100 instead!"

"But it's not a GP100 either."

"Shut up, you're fired."

"That's okay, I have an offer from Charter Arms anyway."

Anyway, I have trouble buying Ruger revolvers enough as it is these days, I'd surely never spend $1400 on this.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
TruthTellers is offline  
Old April 28, 2019, 07:58 AM   #12
P-990
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2, 2002
Location: Only1/2WayThere
Posts: 1,316
I too am rather confused by the naming game. As soon as I saw "8-shots" I knew there was no way it was just a beefed up GP-100, as there's no physical room to put that many rounds into the cylinder. Why they didn't name it some variation of a Redhawk or Super Redhawk baffles me.

It IS impressively ugly, even by Ruger standards. But it may work rather well for it's intended purpose. Only time will tell.
__________________
NRA Master, Highpower Rifle, Across-the-Course
NRA Expert, Highpower Rifle, Mid-Range Prone
P-990 is offline  
Old April 30, 2019, 06:59 AM   #13
OldNick
Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2018
Location: Out in the red dirt
Posts: 26
Oh, I don't know about the ugly part. It IS different. "I ain't fer it, I ain't agin it.", as was said by someone more famous than I.

Some folk think the Super Redhawk is ugly, and I admit I was in that camp for a while too. Until I purchased one.
Then I realized that it looks the way it does, because it does what it does.

I could warm up to the looks of the "Super GP100", especially if it performs.
OldNick is offline  
Old May 2, 2019, 03:48 AM   #14
Mr.RevolverGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 991
I hate what they did with the cylinder
__________________
Mr.Revolverguy
http://www.dayattherange.com
Firearms Reviewed and Reported On: An unbiased opinion with real world use.
Mr.RevolverGuy is offline  
Old May 2, 2019, 08:48 AM   #15
HighValleyRanch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,066
Quote:
I hate what they did with the cylinder
That's what they did with the LCR series.
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"
HighValleyRanch is offline  
Old May 2, 2019, 10:53 AM   #16
laytonj1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2005
Posts: 4,443
Ok, I’ll be the odd man out. I actually like the looks of it, with one exception: the LCR style cylinder. I think an unfluted cylinder would look a whole lot better.
And it sure does look like a Redhawk to me but with a GP100 grip stud.
I’d love to see a range report on one.

Jim
laytonj1 is offline  
Old May 2, 2019, 06:23 PM   #17
smee78
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,918
Nice revolver 10 speed, I like it.
__________________
We know exactly where one cow with Mad-cow-disease is located, among the millions and millions of cows in America, but we haven't got a clue where thousands of illegal immigrants and terrorists are
smee78 is offline  
Old May 3, 2019, 07:36 AM   #18
wild cat mccane
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,626
That is one silly barrel..
wild cat mccane is offline  
Old May 4, 2019, 09:49 AM   #19
5thShock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 28, 2006
Posts: 400
Snake Plissken wouldn't think so.
5thShock is offline  
Old May 7, 2019, 02:49 AM   #20
silvermane_1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2011
Location: Burien,WA
Posts: 897
Yeah the Super GP-100 is a weird looking revolver, but i bet it does it job.
__________________
Rugers:SR1911 CMD,MK 3 .22lr 6",Sec. Six '76 liberty .357 4",SRH .480 Ruger 7.5",Mini-14 188 5.56/.233 18.5", Marlins: 795 .22lr 16.5",30aw 30-30 20",Mossberg:Mav. 88 Tact. 12 ga, 18.5",ATR 100 .270 Win. 22",S&W:SW9VE
9mm 4",Springfield:XD .357sig 4", AKs:CAI PSL-54C, WASR 10/63, WW74,SLR-106c
silvermane_1 is offline  
Old May 7, 2019, 07:32 AM   #21
TxFlyFish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2011
Posts: 1,246
How do you clean that barrel sleeve?
TxFlyFish is offline  
Old May 7, 2019, 11:53 AM   #22
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Quote:
I hate what they did with the cylinder
I suspect that it is a weight saving effort. --Probably more to reduce rotating mass than overall weight.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old May 7, 2019, 09:31 PM   #23
Carmady
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2013
Location: on the lam
Posts: 1,735
I was looking at the link in post #4 and at the bottom of the page there's a circle with a microphone in it with the caption, TELL THE CEO.

That made me laugh.
Carmady is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09255 seconds with 10 queries