|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 31, 2013, 05:37 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: July 3, 2013
Posts: 26
|
Interchangeable Bullets
Are the bullets from a .30-40 Krag, .30-30 Winchester, and .30-06 Springfield all interchangeable?
|
July 31, 2013, 05:49 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Location: Monroe,NC
Posts: 669
|
they are all 30 cal. bullets but they are different shapes for the 30-30 for the tubular mag. I have a 30-30 TC contender that I load BT bullets for because its single shot.
__________________
The man that die's with the most stuff win's! |
July 31, 2013, 05:53 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 8, 2000
Posts: 2,101
|
As mentioned they are all .308 caliber, but, the magazine from which they are fed will make the differences in which ones you can use for what.
If you have a single shot like mentioned then your good to go. I read where a lot of folks only load two rounds in their 30-30 both being a spitzer type, one in the chamber one in the mag. This I guess in their minds eye alleviates the possibility of one round setting the other off. Personally my only 30-30 is a Contender as well so I don't have any issues at all.
__________________
LAter, Mike / TX |
July 31, 2013, 06:29 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2005
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,000
|
Not to be picking nits but they are all 30 caliber bullets at .308" diameter.
__________________
,,, stupidity comes to some people very easily. 8/22/2017 my wife in a discussion about Liberals. Are you ready for civil war? |
July 31, 2013, 09:11 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: July 3, 2013
Posts: 26
|
Flashhole, i'm as new as it gets to reloading and none of the articles or books I read covered this so I was just wondering if maybe the bottoms or something were shaped a little different or something like that.
|
July 31, 2013, 09:14 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: July 3, 2013
Posts: 26
|
I'm so new infact that I haven't even reloaded a single bullet yet, i've got to read some more books i got coming in the mail before i take that step.
|
July 31, 2013, 09:54 PM | #7 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
The biggest difference between the .308 cartridges you mentioned is the shape of the nose. Flat and round-nose bullets for the 30-30 because of the tubular magazines (and traditionally round bullets for 30-40), and spire pointed bullets for the .308 Winchester, and 30-06 for flatter trajectories. It is notable that there currently are bullets for the 30-30 that are pointed, but the point is a soft plastic that cannot set the primer off in the cartridges ahead of it in the tubular magazine. Quote:
Last edited by dahermit; July 31, 2013 at 10:03 PM. |
||
August 1, 2013, 12:22 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
For example... some common 'variants' within the flat-base category: Radiused edge: The .30-40 Krag is a great example of a cartridge that uses a lot of "flat base" bullets that actually have a small (~0.025") radius around the base. The radius helps bullet alignment while seating, and prevents crushed necks. Beveled edge: Many bullets larger than .22 caliber have a slight chamfer/bevel around the edge of the base. Like the radius found on ".30-40 bullets", it helps with alignment and damage prevention. But, with thin case walls, it isn't as effective at preventing snags as the radiused base.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
August 1, 2013, 05:40 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2005
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,000
|
Old Ugly wrote - "Flashhole, i'm as new as it gets to reloading and none of the articles or books I read covered this so I was just wondering if maybe the bottoms or something were shaped a little different or something like that."
There's plenty of room for confusion, especially when you look at all the different cartridges in the same caliber. An example - 22 caliber cartridges - 22 Hornet, 218 Bee, 219 Wasp, 221 Fireball, 222 Remington, 223 Remington, 224 Winchester, 220 Swift, 22-250 and more all shoot the same diameter bullet .224". Case shape and powder capacity separate them on the performance scale and there is no rhyme or reason for how names are assigned. Throw in barrel twist that favor specific bullet profiles, weight and length and you have a puzzle that takes a while to piece together. And that's not even looking at powder selection.
__________________
,,, stupidity comes to some people very easily. 8/22/2017 my wife in a discussion about Liberals. Are you ready for civil war? |
August 1, 2013, 07:12 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
As you dont say which bullet you're thinking of uising where I thought I'd pass on a bit of experience for you. 30-30 in a .308 rifle will definitely load & fit. It''ll go bang as well, but there's a bit more to it than just that. Bullets are designed for a rifling twist & velocity range, if you go outrside that range you may not get acceptable performance.
I was given some 30-30 bullets that were found & I loaded them in a .308, which is also.308" dia. On firing they disintegrated withing 10 feet of the muzzle spraying a target with smears of lead. I couldn't figure out why they weren't hitting a 25 yd sighting in target so I moved closer to discover the problem. I guess the twist rate & much higher velocity were just more than the bullet was designed for.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
August 1, 2013, 02:52 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 188
|
roughedge, I always wanted more toys because I thought it was the, "man who dies with the most toys, wins".
__________________
Richard L. |
August 1, 2013, 03:31 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: May 11, 2013
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 39
|
30-40, 30-30, 30-06 interchangeable?
Dear Old Ugly...I believe in the KISS Principle. "Keep it Simple Stupid"
Honestly, your question really concerned me...For your safety... If the caliber is not stamped on the barrel, do not use the ammo... Rifles, and pistols can be fixed or replaced, but fingers, or hands blown off, eyes put out, even death, due to ignorance, or negligence, cannot. Daddy said the only stupid question is the one you did not ask! Your question tells me you want to know the "right" answer, and your question, might possibly save a newby from a horrible accident! Thanks for asking..DD |
August 1, 2013, 09:22 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
|
|
August 3, 2013, 06:08 AM | #14 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 19, 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 578
|
you can but there are rules.
1. a bullet for a 30-30 will have a different location for the cannelure. SO i fyou simply go by that line, you will have cartridge length issues. 2. lenghth to weight to diamemeter ratio will be off. but careful work can make that dissapear. |
August 3, 2013, 06:38 AM | #15 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
August 3, 2013, 08:25 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
|
30/40 and 30-06 bullets will interchange. You can also interchange 30/30 to 30/40 or 30-06, but do not interchange 30/40 and 30-06 to 30/30. 30/30 requires a flat tipped bullet because of tubular magazine to prevent the chance of the bullet from setting off the primer of the cartridge in front of it.
As far as I know, the only .308 diameter bullet that the manufacturers list as cartridge specific are for the 30/30.
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question. What is stupid is not asking it. |
August 3, 2013, 09:12 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2012
Posts: 527
|
I have the ruger GSR (.308) and decided to try all bullets weights from 100gr up to 168gr. I may go heavier but the lighter ones are easier on me and cost less. One of the reasons I decided on getting the gsr is because of the wide variety of bullets available.
Does anyone have experience loading the lighter weights in the gsr? |
August 3, 2013, 09:33 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
|
To throw a wrench into the works, not all .30-30's are tube feed. I have one with a box mag...
Tony |
August 3, 2013, 09:42 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
|
|
August 3, 2013, 09:43 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
|
|
August 3, 2013, 12:28 PM | #21 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 19, 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 578
|
sectional density can be an issue for some guns.
|
August 3, 2013, 04:05 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Posts: 641
|
Quote:
All the sectional density issues disappear out the end of the barrel. |
|
August 3, 2013, 04:41 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
There are tube-fed .30-06s, .30-40s, and .308s; box-magazine-fed .30-30s; and rotary-mag-fed .30-40s and .308s (plus any other combination you can think of). Bullet shape should not be dictated by the cartridge it's going in, as much as the rifle it's being fired in (type of magazine, and chamber dimensions). Even then... you can use anything you want (of appropriate diameter), so long as the reloader and shooter understand any potential limitations, and/or safety precautions, inherent to the combination. I shoot 60 gr XTPs (.312") and 125 gr Ballistic Tips in a tube-fed .30-30. I have also used 220 gr RN bullets in that .30-30. And, I have used 165 gr Swift Sciroccos and Remington Core-Lokts in a .30-40. None of them are recommended combinations, but did just fine, when used with an understanding of their limitations.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
August 6, 2013, 10:47 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
I have shot a .355" bullet through a .308 groove barrel.
The lead core went through, but the jacket stayed behind in the chamber. Ackley shot .323" bullets through a .308 groove barrel, with no increase in pressure. But he had to open the chamber neck, so the bullet could get going before it swaged down to the bore size. This phenomena of large bullets working in a small bore without pressure spikes is documented in P.O. Ackley 1966 "Handbook for Shooters and Reloaders Vol 2" chapter 7 "additional pressure tests": "..30 cal barrel pressure barrel was fitted to the test gun, but the neck and throat was enlarged to accept the 8mm bullet, with the bore remaining the standard 30 caliber. A Remington factory 30-06 cartridge with the 150 gr bullet had been tested and previously gave 57,300 psi, for a velocity of 3030 fps. The the bullets were pulled from two more Remington 150 grain cartridges and were replaced with 8mm 150 grain bullets. To everyone's surprise, although the velocity was rather erratic, these loads averaged 2901 fps, with a pressure of 40,700 psi."
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
|
|