May 1, 2013, 09:47 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2012
Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
Posts: 186
|
What an INSULT!
Now, I don't have my CCW, but I do live fire exercises, holster drills, and dry fires. I hate mainstream media trying to make it seem that people with their CCWs are delusional. Out of all the people that applied for the experiment THEY chose the six that would best fit their propaganda.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QjZY3WiO9s |
May 1, 2013, 09:53 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
This is an old story, BTW. I'll let this run a bit for those who might have missed it. However, can we do more than just complain?
Glenn
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
May 1, 2013, 10:05 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
The video is a good reminder that if someone is going to carry a gun, he/she needs training and practice, and that the training needs to cover more than being able to stand in place and hit a stationary target.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
May 1, 2013, 10:14 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2012
Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
Posts: 186
|
I agree, that to the people that do carry, this will put a thing or two in perspective. But this was not done to motivate Sheepdogs to keep training.
|
May 1, 2013, 10:29 AM | #5 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,819
|
I can't get to youtube right now. Is this the one that Diane Sawyer (I think it was) did on CCWs in a lecture hall with an active shooter?
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
May 1, 2013, 10:30 AM | #6 |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
Rigged test where the gun man knew where the student was and the student deliberately given a shirt purposely designed to make a good draw impossible. This video proves nothing except the liberal media has no scruples and will never give a fair and balanced report on this topic. We beat this video to death when it first came out but it should be discussed again for the new crowd on this forum.
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- |
May 1, 2013, 10:32 AM | #7 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,819
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
May 1, 2013, 10:41 AM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2013
Posts: 4
|
conceled carry
I do have a CCW. I am 65 years old and female -- gasp! I made the decision to carry a long time ago. I was raised in a hunting house hold and was a member of the junior NRA as soon as I was old enough. I try to educate people to the fact that a gun is just a tool. Like a shovel or an axe. Once you are trained to use it that is all it is, a tool. It is sad that the main stream media has forgotten how they got the freedom to blab the way they do. Several of my ancestors died so they could tell me I am a paranoid delusional because I know how to defend myself. I guess controversy sell air time.
|
May 1, 2013, 12:38 PM | #9 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
It's a prime example of a politically-motivated piece, using a cherry-picked experimental group who are pretty much set up to fail. Most gun folks saw through it at the time, and most non-gun folks largely ignored it.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
May 1, 2013, 02:43 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: April 10, 2013
Posts: 64
|
My my my. Lies and deception on the part of the Media about firearms and CCW holders? Say it ain't so! Sorry, no offense to any here but, this is rather like saying a dog barked at me.
Face it. As a dear friend of mine who happens to be homosexual and a gun owner, put it to me... "I can leave the closet for being Gay but have to go back in for being a gun owner." We gun folks are one of the groups fully approved for outbursts of steady bigotry. |
May 2, 2013, 01:06 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,292
|
Quote:
IMhO we share the burden with smokers and fat folk. However I take comfort in knowing us fat folk are a SIZABLE majority in this country. |
|
May 2, 2013, 01:30 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 449
|
Quote:
|
|
May 2, 2013, 10:17 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
|
Quote:
Yeah that clip is a bit old. It's also a bit made up, aka "a controlled experiment." Only 5 or 6 people know I carry. I'll take my chances that the AS has xray vision and makes me the first target. Conversely, just by unlucky chance, I need to consider that I could be the first target of any AS scenario. Soo, I take this as a hint that training is always a must.
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time. |
|
May 2, 2013, 11:01 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2010
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 1,863
|
Furthermore, there is no law that says as a fellow with a CCW I have to be the first one to stand up an engage.
To quote my old platoon sergeant "Before you go off trying to win fire superiority, make sure you got cover and concealment down first."
__________________
NRA Life Member Read my blog! "The answer to any caliber debate is going to be .38 Super, 10mm, .357 Sig or .41 Magnum!" |
May 2, 2013, 12:26 PM | #15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: August 26, 2012
Posts: 11
|
What an INSULT!
I think a major issue that has not been mentioned, and was twisted in the video, is that although the handling and reaction wasn't perfect, and the gun carrier/good Samaritans would have been shot/killed in most instances [in the video], they shot the perpetrator. They might have saved many lives. If in the process of saving the lives of my family, I shoot and kill an armed intruder, and through my adrenaline surged mistakes, manage to get myself killed as well, I'll take that as win. Still better than my family joining me in death and the intruder surviving.
|
May 2, 2013, 01:35 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2013
Location: Near Heart of Texas
Posts: 870
|
First time I have seen this YouTube
Yes, for sure, pure propaganda. The intruder had no confusion & was well prepared on who to shoot. Thanks for posting.
I have a CHL, & I'll admit that I don't always carry. I don't practice my CC draw much either. Now I'm wide open for criticism. But I have a number of issue I haven't overcome yet, like best CC holster, best clothing the right handgun itself. These are all good topics for other threads. The way I see it, the point about CC is that the intruder doesn't know what to expect either. Even if I carried a gun in an ankle holster & it took me a few seconds to get behind something to get it out, isn't that better than nothing? If I was a bad guy & somebody was shooting back at me, I would definitely be distracted & confused a bit. As a matter of fact, there are a few stories about mass shooters getting startled just seeing someone else with a gun & quickly decide it's time for their own suicide shot. Good deal. Having an elite handgun combat fighter around would be great, but sometimes, just the presence of a gun in good hands is enough to stop a crime. But that is hardly ever reported or popularized. JIMHO... ...bug |
May 3, 2013, 08:22 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 2,018
|
The good news is that by looking that the 35000+ thumbs down votes that its a big propaganda fail.
Even anti gun folks can see how these people are set-up to fail with the long shirt and wearing gloves. |
May 3, 2013, 05:47 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: June 15, 2011
Location: North Central Texas
Posts: 15
|
What an INSLUT
Let's try another scenario. Have all the students dressed as they usually dress on campus and arm one (or more) with the handgun BUT do not tell the perp who is armed. Then let the perp enter the classroom and figure out who is armed before he is taken out.
__________________
Gstone |
May 3, 2013, 05:55 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 5, 2011
Posts: 350
|
Of all the things to complain about in that video you chose the people they used in the scenario? I don't think that anyone would be successful with the odds stacked that highly against them.
|
May 3, 2013, 06:10 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 5, 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 474
|
the media would have a point of view in mind, and then go build a story to fit that point of view, and call it news?
don't even watch them anymore. |
May 3, 2013, 09:16 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
|
What a crock . All the ccw guys were in the same place ,front row center and the shooter new it and went straight for them . As for the claim you need to train , I think thats spot on .
I'm not really sure what the reporter was trying to get across in the story . Was she saying , even if you have a gun that does not mean you will be able to fight off an attack ? It sounded like she was saying . It would be hard to win in that situation so why bother . If the point was the former I would agree but that does not mean you don't even try . I say just ask Susan Gratia-Hupp how she would feel about this .http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgrIsuO5PLc She watched people die all around her And could do nothing about it cus she was not aloud to have her gun with her . Just because you are in the area of a shooting does not mean you will be the first to get shot as the report seems to imply . It appears she would have been able to take the guy out . Last edited by Metal god; May 4, 2013 at 03:56 AM. |
May 4, 2013, 02:18 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
The experiment may have been flawed, but it did expose problems with lack of training.
One thing to remember is that the student was the second target of the gunman not the first. There was time to draw and fire for the last couple of students. The point remains, just having a gun is not enough. |
May 4, 2013, 04:12 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
|
I believe the video shows the experiment's flaws when that last guy takes cover never moves and yet the gunman goes right at him even though there are plenty of other targets . It was clear the gunman got his intended target the teacher then turned his attention to his next "intended" target the ccw guy . I don't care who you are if your the intended target of a surprise attack your odds of surviving it will go down quite a bit .
I'd like to see that exact same experiment and the only difference being the gunman does not know who has the ccw or where they are seated . Oh lets also not have the gunman be a professional firearms instructor or cop and just your average bad guy like the average god guy they are putting him up against . If they did that I would bet the ccw guy would not look so inept . They say real world it would be different . well then lets see a real world scenario |
May 4, 2013, 12:32 PM | #24 | |||
Member
Join Date: April 19, 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
From the online Merriam-Webster Dictionary: (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/propaganda) Quote:
ETA: Quote:
BP Last edited by Beepy; May 4, 2013 at 12:47 PM. |
|||
May 7, 2013, 12:33 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 449
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|