|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Which one do you like best? | |||
.36 Cal | 12 | 30.00% | |
.44 Cal | 28 | 70.00% | |
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 9, 2008, 01:45 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2007
Posts: 334
|
.36 or .44 Which is more popular?
I just bought an 1858 New Army.36 cal from Cabelas that should be here in a week or so. I'm excited to get back to shooting BP, I have a 20+ year old 1851 Navy that I haven't shot for years due to problems with cylinder rotation. My first BP revolver was an Uberti 1860 .44 that was a lot of fun. I went back and forth between .44 and .36 cal and opted for the .36 because I still have balls for it. I was wondering which is more popular with the good folks on TFL. Also if anybody cares to post their favorite loads for their .36 Remi I'd love to hear it.
Thanks! |
April 9, 2008, 01:55 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 719
|
I would think that the .44 caliber Cap & ball revolvers would be more popular because of the more offerings available in that caliber than .36.
|
April 9, 2008, 03:04 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Raider2000 + 1
|
April 9, 2008, 03:11 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2007
Posts: 334
|
You're probably right, in fact I could only find 1 .36 1858 on Cabelas, Midway, or cheaper than dirt, and it doesn't even come in the original bbl length.
|
April 9, 2008, 03:20 PM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Location: South-Western North Carolina
Posts: 1,124
|
IMO the .44 is, but I do see some .36 Colt '51's.
|
April 9, 2008, 03:36 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 78
|
Well I'm gonna agree that the .44 is more popular but I really love my .36s. I find it to be more accurate too, either in my colt repros or my remington repro. Smaller bore, more pressure, less recoil, flatter trajectory maybe? Can't say for sure but if I had to shoot in a competition I would take my '51 or '61 Navy or even my Remington Navy over my bigger .44s everytime.
Don't get me wrong, I love the .44s too, especially the Horse Pistols (I own a Walker, Dragoon 2nd Model, couple of '60 Armies and a Remington '58 NMA) with more smoke, bigger boom and bigger holes. But like I said, in my humble opinion you can't beat the "little" .36. I think you are gonna be really impressed with that Cabelas Remington NMN .36. I have one and it's quite a shooter. All my .36s (3 Uberti Colts and 1 Pietta Remington) are really happy with 20-25 grains 3f Goex BP, wad over powder and .375 balls I cast myself!
__________________
49th Indiana Volunteer Infantry, Co. F |
April 9, 2008, 03:42 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 46
|
I'm rather odd, I guess, since I like the medium calibers - .38, .357, 9mm - in modern guns, but prefer the larger ones - .44, .45 - in BP guns.
Still, even for that, I really need a .36 Remington to match my .44. J.C.
__________________
The irrational can't be made rational any more than one can find reason in the unreasonable. |
April 9, 2008, 04:36 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2007
Posts: 334
|
Thanks for the load Captain!
So does anyone know if the Cabelas 1858 New Army is an Uberti or a Pietta? |
April 9, 2008, 05:18 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 78
|
The Cabelas 1858 New Model Navy .36 is a Pietta.
Here's mine, same as yours: Stainless Steel Uberti 1858 New Model Army .44 and Pietta 1858 New Model Navy .36 (Cabelas)
__________________
49th Indiana Volunteer Infantry, Co. F |
April 9, 2008, 06:53 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
|
I'd say that the .44 is more popular only cause there are more models made for that caliber. As far a looks, feel, accuracy, and economy goes; IMNSHO, nothing can beat an 1851 or 1861 Navy in .36 cal. Maybe that's why I have more than a dozen of em.
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce |
April 9, 2008, 07:17 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,190
|
I've got three .44's but no .36's. I really need a .36 51 Navy.
|
April 9, 2008, 07:23 PM | #12 | |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 78
|
Hawg Haggen said:
Quote:
__________________
49th Indiana Volunteer Infantry, Co. F |
|
April 9, 2008, 07:28 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,190
|
I almost bought one instead of my 60 Army but I was already set up to cast 44 balls. A .36 means yet another bullet mold.
|
April 9, 2008, 07:41 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: In the oak studded hills near Napa
Posts: 2,203
|
Couldn't you people wait 'til I gather all the .44s I need, before you go hypin' up the .36s?
__________________
grym |
April 9, 2008, 09:34 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2008
Posts: 669
|
Well i mouthed of about me geting my 36 cal remmy,
now i am not sure i did the right thing, i was in two minds to get me another 44 remmy?. like i have said before i like the look of a open top but remmys got them beat by a long shot, thats just my OPINON.
__________________
Sod Buster Tried To Pull On Willson. |
April 10, 2008, 04:01 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,190
|
I like Remington and have had one for many years. Got another one last year and a 60 Colt. The Colt feels better and points better and I find myself shooting it more.
|
April 10, 2008, 08:44 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 78
|
Yep,
I have a total of two Remington repros and seven Colts. Guess which I like better?? Always been a Colt man, there's just something about them. They are definitely easier to clean too. Aesthetically, nothing compares to the Colts. In my opinion anyone and EVERYONE into cap and ball revolvers needs a '51 or a '61 Navy or two in .36. It was the most popular and prolific pistol in it's time.
__________________
49th Indiana Volunteer Infantry, Co. F |
April 10, 2008, 11:22 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2008
Posts: 669
|
I dont know how you can say that the colt is easier
to clean than the remmy? for a start there is less parts to strip down and the remmy has a one peace frame which is less liable to work lose, but haveing said that my next pistol will be the 1860 in 44 cal. Maybe i should have got me one insted of the 36 remmy.
__________________
Sod Buster Tried To Pull On Willson. |
April 10, 2008, 03:03 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2008
Posts: 214
|
44 guilty i have 4 of them
|
April 10, 2008, 10:10 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Grand Prairie, Texas
Posts: 46
|
I got a .36 Remmy from Cabelas last week and it's a nice shooter.. Had both it and the 44s in my hands .. All felt great.. Ended up goin with the 36 since it's cheaper to shoot... Components sure arent getting any cheaper..
|
April 11, 2008, 11:01 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: January 15, 2008
Posts: 38
|
A Ruger Old In .36
I would love to see a kit to convert a ROA to .36 caliber.I love my big Ruger;but my .36 1858 Remington goes to the range every time.Still I'm very fond of my 1858 .44.The cost would be out of this world.
|
April 18, 2008, 12:27 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2007
Posts: 334
|
Here's a photo of my two .36s. The 1858 arrived a few days ago, my son and I will take it out this weekend to shoot. The fit and finish on this gun is very good, and the grips have some nice grain. As soon as I took it out of the box and started wiping it down I thought, "now I'm gonna have to get the pocket .31[IMG][/IMG]
|
April 18, 2008, 01:14 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 78
|
Very nice Mark B,
A friend of mine just picked up an original (I believe the production date on it was mid 1860's) pocket Navy .31 in a box with the powder flask and mold for $1000. . I really really liked it. Felt really nice in the hand. There truly is something special about the original Colts. Was in really good shape too, nipples were fine, action was pretty good and some of the engraving was still slightly visible on the cylinder. If only those old guns could tell their stories. He's gonna shoot it too! Now it's got me looking at a repro pocket Navy too, lol, just what I need!
__________________
49th Indiana Volunteer Infantry, Co. F |
April 18, 2008, 03:03 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 719
|
Quote:
Why? When he can get one that is a cheap reproduction for loads less & preserve the old beaute. |
|
April 18, 2008, 03:07 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,190
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|