|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 9, 2017, 11:04 AM | #1 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,832
|
First experience with Inline
OK, I didn't shoot it, but a student brought one to the muzzle loading class. He fired a few round but after the third round, his Rem 209 primer didn't ignite his Pyrodex powder. We pulled the plug, cleaned it and it still wouldn't fire. We then sprinkled some 2F powder down the chamber and then it went boom!
Everytime he used only Pyrodex, he had trouble. When he went with holy black, no problem. We suggested he get hotter 209 primers and try finding holy black.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
October 9, 2017, 11:17 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 280
|
|
October 9, 2017, 11:22 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2009
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 651
|
probably needs to clean the breech plugs flash channel out with the proper sized drill bit. If a 209 primer doesnt set of pyrodex, that sucker is clogged!
__________________
https://buckskinsbp.blogspot.com/ |
October 9, 2017, 11:28 AM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 13, 2017
Posts: 429
|
Was it the loose powder or 50 gr pellets?
|
October 9, 2017, 01:07 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
|
Something like that won't make any difference as to which powder is used. Standard percussion caps set off Pyrodex just fine. The only ignition problem I've had with Pyrodex was with my 63 Sharps with it's two turns in the firing channel. It still fired every time but it was like shooting a badly timed flintlock.
|
October 9, 2017, 05:00 PM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Posts: 508
|
and they say an inline using 209 is more reliable than an old fashion sidelock..
|
October 9, 2017, 05:57 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: Auburn, AL.
Posts: 2,332
|
The fire ain't gettin' to the Pyrodex. A 209 will light it every time.
__________________
. . . Have a Colt and a smile. |
October 9, 2017, 06:32 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
|
Rem #10's never had an issue lighting P or RS for me in my ROA or my Lyman rifle through about 2 1/2 lbs of it. Certainly even a weak 209 has much more oomph.
|
October 10, 2017, 06:23 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
i can't imagine a 209 primer not firing a well maintained inline gun loaded with Pyrodex. It's a breech plug problem. Three of my inline guns use #11 caps. They fire Pyrodex every time.
|
October 10, 2017, 07:01 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Rather than using normal 209 primers, I always had good luck using 777 Primers. They seem to be a little hotter.
|
October 10, 2017, 10:27 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2009
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 651
|
777 primers are actually the coldest primers you can get. They are a "specialty" primer thats cooler and helps reduce crud ring with t7/pyrodex.
__________________
https://buckskinsbp.blogspot.com/ |
October 10, 2017, 02:25 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Really? I always thought the opposite. Well, they sure worked for me.
|
|
|