|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 20, 2019, 08:00 PM | #1 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
ATF Announces New Category of NFA Weapon for Franklin Reformation.
Witness the newly created, GCA/SBS - a short barrel shotgun subject to the Gun Control Act rather than the NFA.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/...-reclassified/ |
December 20, 2019, 09:58 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,469
|
Cool. A "shotgun" that ... doesn't ... chamber ... shotgun ... ammunition.
My head hurts.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO 1911 Certified Armorer Jeepaholic |
December 20, 2019, 10:00 PM | #3 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
A shotgun with a straight rifled barrel even.
|
December 20, 2019, 10:52 PM | #4 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,846
|
Gotta love legal definitions...sometimes...
Let's create a gun that splits hairs on legal definitions in various laws and see how many we can sell (at ~$1400) before the govt finally decides where in their framework it belongs. Oh, and the ATF says you can't sell any to a non-FFL, and if you already privately own one you cant take it across state lines UNTIL we come up with a process to fit it into our system. And what is it? I admit I'm not into the AR market, but it appears to be a short barrel, short stocked AR in 5.56mm with a grooved, not rifled barrel. Since the straight grooves do not impart spin, and imparting spin is the whole point of rifling, it isn't "rifled". And, if it isn't rifled, then by definition, it can't be a rifle. SO it skirts that legal definition. But , its also not chambered for shotgun ammunition, so its avoids the definition of shotgun in that direction. Is it a handgun? handguns have to be rifled, or they fall into the "sawed off shotgun" class. Is it an AOW? Is it an NFA item, or just a "regular" gun that falls under the other gun control laws (GCA 68 in particular)?? Seems to be the ATF is trying to make up its mind. I'm sure they will, eventually. They always do. Just their mind changes sometimes.... A .223 that doesn't spin the bullets....I don't have a use for one of those...nor do I have the $ to donate to the worthy cause of poking gun control law in the eye while following the letter of the law. Additionally, my state is one of the 11 states they listed as NOT selling to, so for me, its a moot point. perhaps some enterprising fellow or group will come up with .224 caliber fin stabilized projectile, but be sure it doesn't meet anyone's definition of armor piercing, or we won't be able to buy those, either...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
December 21, 2019, 12:04 AM | #5 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
It’s also damn near useless on a practical level. Unless the practice is to confound the ATF.
|
December 21, 2019, 03:26 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
|
In 5.56, yes and yes.
In a pistol caliber with a nose-heavy Foster slug style bullet? Not match grade, but perhaps workable. The GCA defines shotguns as firing shotgun shells and smoothbore. I'm thinking the ATF is just throwing spaghetti at the wall here. |
December 21, 2019, 05:45 AM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
To be honest, that looks a lot like the ATF is saying, "It's new. We don't like it. Let's try to ban it."
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
December 21, 2019, 06:26 PM | #8 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,846
|
Quote:
So not exactly a ban, as there is an implied "when we do, you can" but in practical terms at this moment, if you can't buy one, its a distinction without a difference.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
December 22, 2019, 02:51 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,888
|
Quote:
"Well, it's not a rifled barrel and it has a buttstock, thus it can only be a shotgun." "Yeah, but to be a shotgun the barrel has to be smooth." "It's not rifled and it's not smooth, but it's obviously going to be the next trend by gunmakers to make what would be a short barrel shotgun with a barrel under 18 inches and put these grooves in it so it doesn't have to be regulated like Short Barrel Shotguns are, so we have to come up with something otherwise there's going to be blood running in the streets." "Oh hell, let's just work some magic like we did with bump stocks and say it simulates a sawed off shotgun and that which simulates that which is regulated we'll just declare that the simulated gun IS what it simulates and thus must also be regulated." "EXCELLENT! That simulated gun being no different than the gun that's regulated would work wonders for those pesky pistol braces and the SBR regulations! We'll get to working on that when we get back in 2020. Excellent work people, we saved the day again! Merry Christmas to all!"
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
|
December 22, 2019, 03:50 AM | #10 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,993
|
This kind of thing is to be expected when you play the kind of game Franklin is playing. Eventually there's going to be pushback. In this case, it really only affects the Reformation, but in the past, companies have pushed the boundaries and affected the whole community when they finally drew attention from the BATF.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
December 22, 2019, 06:21 AM | #11 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
December 22, 2019, 06:22 AM | #12 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
December 22, 2019, 10:11 AM | #13 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
The thing is, the Reformation was impractical as a firearm anyway - particularly with pistol braces being a thing. I don’t think I’ve ever seen one in the wild.
There isn’t really any logical point to reclassifying the Fostech ABV and Reformation and then doing nothing about pistol braces. If I had to guess, I’d say that ride may be coming to an end after 2020. |
December 22, 2019, 02:17 PM | #14 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,846
|
What's impractical about a short barrel, short stock AR pattern 5.56mm that isn't rifled, so will likely be minute of man accurate clear out to across the room distance, maybe?? and that can fire when you pull the trigger and when you let it trigger go??
{sarcasm} I seriously doubt any good will come of this, beyond a temporary profit for the manufacturer. Likely it will result in harm, in the form of enhanced regulation, and new "interpretation" of regulations applied to other things,. At least the maker isn't publicly sticking out their tongue and going "neener,neener" the way some kids have done over 3D printing and "ghost guns"... so far, anyway...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
December 22, 2019, 02:33 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
I was ecstatic about the idea of a non-NFA shotgun like the Mossberg Raptor, even though I have not purchased one. It has a particular use for a limited number of circumstances. I was never crazy about bump stocks, though I could see the fun in shooting one. But the Reformation? I don't see a need, a use, or any particular fun in owning or shooting one --- unless it's by those who just like to poke the bear. But, sometimes, the bear pokes back.
|
December 22, 2019, 03:19 PM | #16 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,993
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
December 23, 2019, 10:22 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2008
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
|
|
December 23, 2019, 01:58 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,679
|
With pistol braces avail, i dont see the need for this type of firearm.
I can have a rifled barrel of whatever length i want and keep the accuracy that a rifled barrel gives me. |
December 23, 2019, 02:05 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2008
Posts: 240
|
Yeah, but the Reformation was/is legal in more places than the pistols due to its classification.
|
December 23, 2019, 03:35 PM | #20 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,993
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
December 23, 2019, 03:49 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2008
Posts: 240
|
They did...just like the bump stock.
As mentioned too many people wrote letters, although that is not what happened with the bump stocks and I haven't heard much as far as letter writing goes with the braces. My opinion...the ATF didn't really like the idea of the bump stock, but didn't "really" have a way of "saying this isn't legal" after giving it the go...then along comes that ASSHAT in Vegas and they had their "out". I'm not say the two are related, I'm saying they (ATF) saw an opportunity and took it. In the end...don't write letters to the ATF. |
December 24, 2019, 11:40 PM | #22 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,846
|
Quote:
and, seldom for the good. Right now, "pistol braces" are legal. Will they always be? I wouldn't bet the farm on it. At one time, stocked pistol were an NFA item. Then certain curio & relic guns were ok, with a repro stock. Then, later they weren't, and were only ok if the stock was original, too. ALWAYS remember that when you poke the bear and wake him up, he's going to want to EAT SOMETHING! Apparently Franklin Armory either doesn't know this, or doesn't care....
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
December 25, 2019, 08:09 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
December 25, 2019, 11:43 AM | #24 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,090
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
FA though they would make a "firearm" with straight lands and grooves, believing that would make the firearm not a rifle, not a handgun because both require rifling. And as ATF had told them "rifling must impart spin to the projectile". ATF initially told them "its just a firearm". Since it wasn't a rifle, or handgun it could not be a Short Barreled Rifle under the NFA. And not being smoothbore.......it obviously couldn't be a shotgun either. and if not a shotgun, SBS wasn't in the picture either. FA had stated a year or so back that they planned on producing ammunition specifically designed to fire through this Frankengun. If ATF would have determined it to have been a "rifle" day one, no one would have been uttering a peep. Rifling is not defined in federal law or ATF regs, so whether its spiral or straight, imparts a spin or not, lands/grooves vs polygonal, etc.......ATF will find this determination a little difficult to defend. Versus the ATF redefining of "machine gun" to include bump stocks. That wasn't a determination or ruling, but a redefining via their rulemaking authority under federal law.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
|||
December 25, 2019, 11:46 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,090
|
Quote:
It was gunhype of the worst kind by a company struggling to make sales.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
|
|
|