The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 14, 2012, 01:02 AM   #1
three-fifty-seven
Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2012
Posts: 64
Am I properly crimping my rounds?

Howdy guys,

I am wondering if I am properly crimping my heavy .357 Magnum loads (158gr bullet + 17 grains of Lil'Gun around 1540fps). I am a fairly green reloader and I still am figuring out how much crimp I need to apply. Here are some pictures of my crimp jobs as I just want some validation that I am doing it right. Also I am using a Lee .357 crimper.

Now I know I am using two different bullets (Speer 158 plinker + 158 Hornady XTP) to find an answer but both these rounds have two different crimps.





Thanks.

Last edited by three-fifty-seven; August 14, 2012 at 01:08 AM.
three-fifty-seven is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 03:16 AM   #2
beex215
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 10, 2010
Posts: 317
the one on the left looks way bit much. the right looks better but i would notch it down just slightly from that.>>>
__________________
my youtube channel

http://www.youtube.com/user/beehasagun1?feature=mhee
beex215 is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 05:09 AM   #3
Salmoneye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
The one on the right is plenty of crimp...

Basically with heavy loads, you need enough crimp to keep the bullet from jumping under recoil, and not enough to deform the bullet or buckle the case...
Salmoneye is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 08:54 AM   #4
moxie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 513
Agree, too much on the left. The right one looks better but hard to tell.
__________________
If you want to shoot...shoot...don't talk! Tuco

USAF Munitions 1969-1992
RVN 1972-1973
moxie is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 04:30 PM   #5
snuffy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2001
Location: Oshkosh wi.
Posts: 3,055
Can't see them well enough to tell.

When the inside edge of the case mouth is against the bottom of the cannelure, it's enough. Less than that,n is too little, more may buckle the case and lead to early case failure, cracked mouths.
__________________
The more people I meet, the more I love my dog

They're going to get their butts kicked over there this election. How come people can't spell and use words correctly?
snuffy is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 07:30 PM   #6
three-fifty-seven
Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2012
Posts: 64
Okay thanks, I just wasn't sure.
three-fifty-seven is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 08:17 PM   #7
mrawesome22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779
The pics are tiny, blurry, and worthless.

sudo passwd root
mrawesome22 is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 09:18 PM   #8
moxie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 513
If you click on the pics, they should expand. They're not bad.
__________________
If you want to shoot...shoot...don't talk! Tuco

USAF Munitions 1969-1992
RVN 1972-1973
moxie is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 09:23 PM   #9
mrawesome22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779
Maybe a discrepancy between tapa and his pics then. It would be a great app if they fired the devs and put competent ones in their place.

sudo passwd root
mrawesome22 is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 10:22 PM   #10
mrawesome22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779




Fixed it for ya. Right looks about perfect.
mrawesome22 is offline  
Old August 14, 2012, 10:59 PM   #11
joneb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
As stated the round on the left maybe a bit heavy, the case mouth distortion from over crimping can hinder chambering. But adequate crimp maybe needed to provide enough start pressure for the powder to burn efficiently.
joneb is offline  
Old August 15, 2012, 10:33 AM   #12
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
I find it easier to get a good roll crimp than it is to photograph them
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old August 15, 2012, 11:53 AM   #13
SL1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
"Step-down" crimp

The crimp on the right seems about right for a jacketed bullet. As somebody has already written, the idea is to turn-in the case mouth until it touches the bottom of the cannelure, but no further.

HOWEVER, with the advent of some of the heavy-recoiling cartridges like the .500 and .460 S&Ws, there has been some rethinking of the crimp so as to keep these revolvers from walking the bullets out of the case mouths and tying up the cylinders. Speer calls these extra-heavy crimps "step-down" crimps, and makes SOME of their bullets with flat-bottomed cannelures to accomodate them. The case on the left has what looks like a step-down crimp.

For a step-down crimp, the idea is to make the case mouth start at the front of the cannelure and lie flat for a short distance in the bottom of the cannelure until it reaches the back, then expand back to the uncrimped case diameter soon enough that the bullet itself is not swaged/distorted by the crimp. That is definitely hard on the case mouths, and will reduce case life by leading to early splitting. And, with some dies that have sharp edges on the crimp ring, it will scratch brass and may scrape-off nickel plating.

So, it is not a good idea to use a step-down crimp unless it is needed to keep the bullets from moving under recoil.

In a .357 Magnum, I would not think that a step-down crimp would be needed, unless perhaps for ammo to be used in one of those new ultra-light guns that is designed for concealment.

SL1
SL1 is offline  
Old August 19, 2012, 02:35 PM   #14
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
SL1,

"Step-down crimp" and "step down crimp" searches just lead back to you.
Is there another name?



I have been doing the Lee 308 rifle factory crimp upside down on hard recoiling 32 S&W long cartridges.

I am about to do Lee 458WM rifle factory crimp upside down on hard recoiling 45 auto rim cartridges.

It allows me to make a high recoil crimp at any OAL I choose.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old August 20, 2012, 11:32 AM   #15
SL1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
Clark,

You got me thinking about the term "step-down crimp" so I pulled-out my copy of Speer Manual #14 and found their discussion on page 751. BUT, they called it a "neckdown crimp". So, maybe my mind messed-up the term, but I THINK that I have seen it called a "step-down crimp" elsewhere. The Speer write-up says
Quote:
"No special or extras equipment is required if you use Gold Dot bullets and RCBS dies. Rather than rolling the case mouth into the groove, neckdown crimping irons a step at the case mouth that nearly fills the cannelure. ..."
Anyway, try searching for "neckdown crimp" and see if something from Speer comes up.

SL1
SL1 is offline  
Old August 22, 2012, 11:10 PM   #16
joneb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
Wow did Image Shack go anti gun ?
The main reason I crimp revolver loads is to prevent bullet jump.
Take your calipers to the range, shoot all but the last round in the cylinder. Is the COL the same before and after ? If not you have a problem.
joneb is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07388 seconds with 10 queries