The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 15, 2017, 12:26 PM   #51
mikld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,284
After reading a bunch of the posts and trying to really figger out what the OP wants, I'd say get a Lee turret and remove the auto index feature. (I got a lee turret 17 years ago and disabled the auto index 16.99 years ago. Hand indexing works quite well). Use it as a single stage and hand index. If the OP is looking to mount a powder measure on the press "in the future" why not just mount one on a turret and use it as such? K.I.S.S.!!!
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast!
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...
mikld is offline  
Old August 15, 2017, 05:19 PM   #52
TruthTellers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 838
The only reason I'm hesitant to buy the stand and the turret press is it'll cost me $200 more than the C press will and it will take up a lot more space, but it is a press I want and will get eventually, so maybe just getting it now and stop pussyfooting isn't a bad idea.
__________________
Any good revolver > Any good semi auto
TruthTellers is offline  
Old August 15, 2017, 05:46 PM   #53
kmw1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 327
If funds are not an issue then I'd say buy what you truly want the 1st time. Don't settle for something less because down the road you will only question yourself as to why you did it.

If it is truly a matter of space then I suggest you visit some of the other forums, most have a thread somewhere on the topic of benches. You truly will be surprised by how little some are getting away with using. Or just do a web search for reloading benches.
kmw1954 is offline  
Old August 15, 2017, 10:23 PM   #54
Prof Young
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2007
Posts: 1,214
I had that press for years and did hundreds of loads with it. Worked fine as a single stage press . . . until the day that I literally broke the back off the mounting flange. Still worked fine, but I moved up to a better Lee press and just recently up to a Lee turret press which I am liking very much.

Life is good.
Prof Young
Prof Young is offline  
Old August 16, 2017, 11:40 AM   #55
ShootistPRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2017
Posts: 1,295
It is no secret that Lee is the "low bidder" in the reloading game. For a new press you are unlikely to find a cheaper price than Lee offers. Some of their presses are better than others they offer but they are made of less expensive materials and materials that are not as strong as the more expensive presses offered by others. I prefer to buy one press that lasts a lifetime. I prefer to remember the quality i bought and feeling satisfied with what I paid. I am not a Lee "hater" because their products serve a portion of the market and allow people to start reloading on a budget. They are typically cheap presses that flex and break under what I consider to be "normal" use. My Rock Chucker and Lyman turret presses have lasted for more than 40 years and show no signs of wear. They are made of steel and cast iron and will last several lifetimes. You should always use the best quality that you can afford. If that is a product made by Lee and it does the job you ask of it then that is what you should use.
ShootistPRS is offline  
Old August 16, 2017, 12:44 PM   #56
mikld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,284
OK, K.I.S.S. Get the "C" press and load with it. If you have any problems (which I never had) you can get an "O" press later. And you are not locked into one press for the rest of your life (I've had mebbe 8 or 10 presses, still have 4, from gigantic cast iron "O" to lightweight aluminum "C" presses. All made good, safe accurate ammo, from start to finish, when I did my part.). Don't overthink this. You can load safely and accurately with the Lee "C" press. I have never experienced press "flexing" and prolly wouldn't recognize it if it did occur.
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast!
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...

Last edited by mikld; August 17, 2017 at 11:25 AM.
mikld is offline  
Old August 16, 2017, 01:11 PM   #57
hdwhit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 22, 2017
Posts: 209
Quote:
TruthTellers wrote:
What's your opinion on this Lee press?
Worth every penny you pay for it.

But then you're not paying a lot for it.

In a C style press, the die is cantilevered over the ram and will move more than it would in a similar press with an O configuration. The fact the press is aluminum and not iron will increase that movement.

I was looking at one to keep at the farm to deprime cases and hold seating dies to allow me to adjust the seating depth of cartridges I had brought with me. If that's the kind of thing you are looking to do, the Lee C style press will work fine.

In my case, I found a used RCBS Reloader Special cast iron O press on E-bay for about the same money, so I bought that instead since I already have one and am familiar with it.
hdwhit is online now  
Old August 16, 2017, 01:19 PM   #58
hdwhit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 22, 2017
Posts: 209
Quote:
TruthTellers wrote:
Would this "O" frame press be more robust and hold up better over time with more intense loading operations like full length re-sizing?
It will be more robust than a C style press, but a press can (and in my opinion should) be a once-in-a-lifetime investment and you will be happiest if you spend the few extra dollars now that it will cost to get a press with a cast iron frame.

We could go into all sorts of technical reasons why cast iron might be preferred over aluminum (i.e. lower modulus of elasticity, lower thermal expansion, shock resistance, etc.) but at the end of the day you are more likely to have a better reloading experience with a cast iron press than an aluminum one - particularly if you are going to get into high stress applications like case forming.
hdwhit is online now  
Old August 17, 2017, 07:26 AM   #59
jmorris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 2,656
For me aluminum isn't a deal breaker. I have spent lots of hours flying around, floating in and driving things that have engines, transmissions and structures made from the stuff.

That said I am not against cast iron either, although if it breaks, it's a bit more difficult to repair.
jmorris is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 08:13 AM   #60
kmw1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 327
Both cast aluminum and cast iron can and do break and both are a pain to repair.

Also just like a forged steel crankshaft it can break and when it does it's because it was stretched beyond it's designed working point. So I too do not follow your correlation.

Or how about the massive B52 Bomber. It's wings would flex 22' from the at rest position to in flight position and these things have been in service for 50+ years. So again I do not follow your line if you want to discuss "High Stress".
kmw1954 is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 08:46 AM   #61
guitarmike
Junior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2017
Posts: 1
Truth,

If money is tight look at a used press. Check this one out:
http://m.ebay.com/itm/RCBS-JR2-SINGL...%257Ciid%253A4

I think you'd be happier in the long term getting something like this one.


Mike
guitarmike is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 11:50 AM   #62
ShootistPRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2017
Posts: 1,295
Quote:
Or how about the massive B52 Bomber. It's wings would flex 22' from the at rest position to in flight position and these things have been in service for 50+ years. So again I do not follow your line if you want to discuss "High Stress".
The full story on the B52 is that every part has been replaced many times. The wing spars and skin, the fuselage frame and skin, the landing gear and supports, the interior supports and even the seats. The current engines are much more reliable than the originals and they are routinely replaced.Aircraft are maintained on the basis of how many cycles the part has under gone. Aluminum parts can only be made to withstand just so many cycles before it fails whether it has been overstressed or not. Over stressing an aluminum part can cause immediate and total damage even though it was not stressed to the point of failure. Aluminum is a necessary "evil" in aircraft design and construction. It is the only material that is light enough and cost effective to use.

For presses you can use cast iron and steel engineered to last well beyond the life span in even hard use. There really is no comparison between a cast iron press and an aluminum press.

The aluminum bases on the Dillon presses fail after a period of use.
ShootistPRS is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 12:52 PM   #63
jmorris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 2,656
Quote:
Both cast aluminum and cast iron can and do break and both are a pain to repair.
I can repair an aluminum casting and in some cases is better than it was originally, much, much harder to do on cast iron. As long as it's clean, cast aluminum is as easy to weld as a billet of the same mass.

It's nothing to TIG up an aluminum cylinder head with the appropriate rod and remachine it. Some damage to cast iron can be repaired with silicon bronze rod but it's not going to be like it was originally. Cast steel is a different animal though and is much more weldable than cast iron.

In any case aluminum presses have been around for a long time. I have several that I have owned for more than 30 years and still load match winning ammunition.
jmorris is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 12:58 PM   #64
jmorris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 2,656
To say aluminum or even a C style press can't load ammunition capable of benchrest levels of accuracy would be a false statement.

That said, the best ones are a bit different than the little Lee.

http://www.sinclairintl.com/reloadin...prod33635.aspx
jmorris is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 01:20 PM   #65
kmw1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 327
ShootistPRS, in 1974 I went thru US Air Force Tech school at Chanute AFB for aircraft maintenance training on the lovely B52 and then went on to serve with C141 Starlifters and C5 Galaxy's. Know all about them and their history. The stress loads they face will never be matched by a reloading press.
kmw1954 is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 02:09 PM   #66
rob-c
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2013
Posts: 128
No one has asked you, what are you loading handgun or rifle ammo ? I have a C press that has a universal decaper and I have decapped several thousands rounds of handgun and rifle rounds with no problems . If money is tight and your loading plinker rounds for handguns or smaller rifle calibers then buy it. Then later when you get the space buy a turret press and use the C press to decap.
rob-c is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 02:18 PM   #67
TruthTellers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 838
^ Loading handgun ammo, all with straight walls. Specifically .32, .45 Colt, and possibly in the future .38, 10mm, and .45 ACP.
__________________
Any good revolver > Any good semi auto
TruthTellers is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 02:48 PM   #68
rob-c
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2013
Posts: 128
I would buy it then if your just loading hand gun ammo.your not going to over stress that press enough or ever to have it fail.
rob-c is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 04:11 PM   #69
TruthTellers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 838
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob-c View Post
I would buy it then if your just loading hand gun ammo.your not going to over stress that press enough or ever to have it fail.
And like I said, I'm likely only going to use it for mouth flaring and case charging, universal depriming, and possibly, but not likely, for Lee lube and sizing kits.
__________________
Any good revolver > Any good semi auto
TruthTellers is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 04:26 PM   #70
TwoSeventy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 25, 2016
Posts: 1
LEE Press

I bought the whole package on sale and I will not say where.
I then purchased the complete 4 die set for reloading for my .270 and to me
the press system works fantastic.
TwoSeventy is offline  
Old August 17, 2017, 05:18 PM   #71
mack59
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2004
Posts: 422
My opinion, which is worth what you paid for it, is that if it will work for what you want to do and you are happy with the price - then get it. From what you describe wanting to do, it should work fine.

I have a single stage of another design by another manufacturer - but I wanted a heavy duty do all single stage that could do just about everything and do it in perpetuity. There wasn't only one press for me to choose from in that category and I got the cheaper press - RCBS RockChucker Supreme than the Foster Co-Ax.

Lee makes very usable and affordable products - I love their carbide 45 ACP 4 die set. I don't think you can beat them for the price.

If I personally were getting a Lee press I think I would get the Lee Classic Turret - I don't own one but talking to people that do and reading all the reviews - I find it difficult not to agree that it is the best overall value in a press today.

I ended up with a Dillon 550 - but I paid a lot more.

My decision making on buying a press and reloading equipment is to wait and save for what I want rather than feel like I settle - and to buy something that I will continue to use and not have to replace later. But that's not the only or even the right way to decide. Plenty of people get what they can afford now and upgrade later. Not a thing wrong with that either.

Have fun and enjoy whatever you decide - there really isn't a wrong decision in your choices.
mack59 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2016 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08863 seconds with 10 queries