|
October 19, 2015, 06:38 PM
|
#26 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
|
TMD #19
Quote:
 Wish I would have thought of that! It would have saved me some time and aggravation. Can't see any reason it wouldn't work just fine. Anybody got a discouraging word on this idea? |
|
|
|
October 19, 2015, 09:23 PM
|
#27 |
|
Member
Join Date: August 30, 2015
Posts: 64
|
See Seven's post above, post #16.
Great idea. |
|
|
|
October 20, 2015, 08:02 AM
|
#28 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
|
Quote:
If I had thought of that I would have included a plan, the plan would include a way to verify. In the thought process I would have thought: Why waste time with all the methods and techniques if I am going to verify the adjustment, then I would have thought going straight to verifying would eliminate all the wild guestimates. F. Guffey |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
