The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 31, 2019, 05:22 PM   #1
5pins
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 1998
Location: WV
Posts: 251
Fiocchi .380 ACP 90gr XTP in Clear Ballistics Gel.



Test Gun: Ruger LCP
Barrel length: 2.75 inches.
Ammunition: Fiocchi .380 ACP 90gr XTP
Test media: 10% Clear Ballistics Gel.
Distance: 10 feet.
Chronograph: Caldwell Ballistic Precision Chronograph G2.
Five shot velocity average: 808fps
Gel Temperature 70 degrees.

Shooting the bull on YouTube did an in-depth test on .380 ammo and concluded that the XTP bullet performed the best. I have been meaning to do my testing with this bullet and finally got around to it. I picked up some Fiocchi .380 ammo featuring Hornaday’s XTP bullet.

I got a five-shot average velocity of 808fps with a high of 828fps and a low of 790fps.


Five rounds offhand at 5 yards.

The first round shot in the clear gel had a velocity of 817fps and penetrated to 12.5 inches. The recovered diameter was .45 inches and weight was 89.9 grains. Round two’s velocity was 795fps and the bullet penetrated to 13 inches. The recovered diameter of the bullet was .44 inches and its weight was 90.5 grains.



When shot through the heavy clothing gel neither round expanded. The first round had a velocity of 784fps and penetrated to 17.5 inches. The recovered weight was 89.9 grains. The second round’s velocity was 792fps and it penetrated to a depth of 16.5 inches. It’s recovered weight was 90.4 grains. The second round showed signs of beginning to open up.

__________________
www.general-cartridge.com
5pins is offline  
Old December 31, 2019, 06:33 PM   #2
JERRYS.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,787
great work.
JERRYS. is offline  
Old December 31, 2019, 06:54 PM   #3
David R
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2015
Location: The swamps of WNY
Posts: 753
Thank you
David
David R is offline  
Old December 31, 2019, 07:45 PM   #4
TBM900
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2015
Posts: 672
Not nearly enough penetration IMO
I'll stick with FMJ in 380
__________________
Playboy billionaire
Retired Colonial Marine
1st to walk on the moon without a spacesuit
TBM900 is offline  
Old December 31, 2019, 08:07 PM   #5
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 23,199
Not too bad for .380ACP. I'm kind of surprised. I usually think of Fiocchi as good quality blasting ammo--not something that might be good for self-defense.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old January 1, 2020, 08:18 AM   #6
USNRet93
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 23, 2018
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 1,475
Test some .380 Lehigh Xtreme Defender or G9? Can ya?
__________________
PhormerPhantomPhlyer

"Tools not Trophies”
USNRet93 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.04952 seconds with 10 queries