|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 1, 2015, 12:13 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
which serial number for 4473 on Win pump take down?
I bought 1.5 Win 97 basket cases and built a single gun. That FFL is passed away. I sold the extra rear receiver to an ffl. THAT FFL is passed away too.
I know with FALs it is the upper and with ARs it is the lower. Is there an official list that shows this for all guns? TIA
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
June 1, 2015, 12:48 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Nope.
You can contact the ATF for guidance, but they may not be much help. The receiver is what matters. The takedown extension serial number was just there, as I'm sure you know, so the proper front half would be mated with the receiver.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
June 1, 2015, 05:24 AM | #3 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
If you started out with one-and-a-half firearms, apparently you had two serial numbers. You sold one receiver -- with a serial number -- to an FFL. It would seem to me that if you start with two serial numbers and you sell one serial number, the one you have left is your serial number.
|
June 1, 2015, 05:29 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
|
The one on the receiver...
|
June 1, 2015, 09:06 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
A couple of posters have already stated that the serial number that matters is the one on the receiver. FYI, here's what federal law says about the topic, my emphasis underlined:
Quote:
Serial numbers on other parts of a gun – whether applied for assembly purposes, to comply with military contract requirements, to comply with foreign law, or whatever – are superfluous and meaningless under U.S. federal law.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
June 1, 2015, 12:30 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
If the firearm has an upper and a lower receiver, what do you do when they both have serial numbers and not matching?
Where are the FAL and the AR shown to be different on an ATF list?
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
June 1, 2015, 02:25 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Quote:
The AR series its the trigger mechanism that's legally defined as semi or full auto so its the lower. No, it doesn't make sense, but it is the rule.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
|
June 1, 2015, 03:34 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
An example that came to mind immediately, for me, was older Marlin lever action rifles. Most of the time, Marlin put the serial number on the receiver. Sometimes, they put the serial number on the 'trigger plate' (lower tang and the bottom of the receiver). Once in a while, they put the serial number on both parts. Several guys have gotten determinations from the ATF, in regards to proposed modifications, stating that removing the lower tang serial number from a rifle with dual serial numbers would be considered 'obliteration' and, therefore, would be illegal. Other guys have gotten determinations from the ATF stating that removing a non-matching serial number from the lower tang is perfectly fine. And then there are the guys that want to assemble a rifle from a combination of parts, that would end up as a rifle that has no serial number. In at least one case that was documented on the MarlinOwners forums a few years back, the ATF told the guy that he'd have to file a Form 1, because he would be manufacturing a "new" firearm. They told him that transcribing the serial number from the original lower tang onto the upper tang would not be acceptable. ...It's the ATF. They don't want to tell you what you should do. They just want you to do it, and then tell you it's illegal after the fact.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
June 1, 2015, 03:48 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
I wrote the ATF 20 years ago and asked what was the legal difference between a flash hider and a recoil compensator.
They wrote back and said they did not have time to answer such questions. I wrote my senator republican Slade Gorton. Slade's assistant wrote back and said they have requested the ATF respond to me. I then got a letter from the ATF that said that flash hiders were designed to reduce flash and recoil compensators were designed to reduce recoil.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
June 1, 2015, 04:10 PM | #10 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
|
|
June 2, 2015, 11:35 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Quote:
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
|
|
|