The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 27, 2005, 10:08 PM   #151
desert-cat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2005
Location: Tucson
Posts: 10
Butch:

Are you familiar with Jack O'Connor's hunting experiences in Southern Arizona and Northern Sonora? Well, the Arizona-Sonora border is where I had the privilege to learn what hunting is from old timers: WWII and Korean War veterans, ranchers, cow-boys, miners, small-town guys who never saw a lightbulb before they were 14, etc. In these semi-desertic areas of uncertain rainfall and wide open spaces you soon learn to hunt the paths leading to the water: a windmill, a seasonal spring, a "tinaja" (a natural water reservoir in solid rock) and, in exceptional years, a running "arroyo" (a stream that may be anything between 2 and 200 feet wide and between 1 inch or 5 feet deep, carrying water between one hour and one week a year).

Do you what the conventional wisdom of the experienced hunters was/is?

"The deer always comes down to the water"

The older, wiser men would send us the young kids up to the hills "to find the nice ones" while they would rest under a mesquite or an oak, because some ailment would keep them from going up and down the thorny hillsides. While we were working up a sweat and straining our eyes to find a fresh track . . . BANG!THUD. When we returned to the camp we would see a beautiful deer that had - yes - come down to the water. I don't recall having seen a scope before the 1970s. Most of the shots were under 100 yards. Later, around the campfire, we would learn that we the kids had driven the deer to the lowest part, where it would have to go anyway, to drink the water they need for the day.

It was not a feeder with a timer, just the closest available water.

Was / is it ethical?
desert-cat is offline  
Old June 28, 2005, 03:08 AM   #152
LAK
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 14, 2002
Posts: 2,251
I think some people are missing Butch50's point; the difference between hunting animals and shooting animals. And I fully agree. Not that shooting animals over artificially placed food is inherently wrong; only that it is not hunting.

Lt. Col. C. H. Stockley in his work, "Stalking in the Himalayas and Northern India" (1936), opens with a chapter entitled, "What is Stalking?". He covers about all the bases and goes on ....

"What is "stalking"?
Stalking is getting on foot within shooting or photographing distance of an animal first discovered by eye, making use only of natural cover, and without artificial aid. "Shooting distance" meaning such distance that will almost certainly ensure a clean kill.

This, it will be seen, excludes the use of motor car, elephant, cart or boat, or dressing up in native clothes; the employment of such adventitious aids destroying a true conception of sport, as making the approach too easy by abusing the confidence of the game.

Herein lies the essence of sport, in the means employed to gain one's end. It must not be too easy and the game must have a fair chance. Equally, to gain real sport, the vigour, nerve and intelligence used must be one's own: by merely following at the heels of a hired ghillie or shikari no man can experience the joy of achievement which comes from defeating a wary old beast on his own ground. Not that a fair partnership with the ghillie or shikari is to be despised, far from it; for few can learn the lessons of the wild from books, and it is from such men that one aquires the knowledge which eventually leads to sole conquest of a worthy antagonist, by means worthy of the trophy."
[he then discusses "trophies"] ......

"I would place tracking on an equal plane of sport with stalking, but beating and sitting-up are not in the same category. To take the analogy of fishing; tracking and stalking may be graded with fair methods of rod and line, while beating is equivalent to netting, and sitting up to night-lining." [he then dissects "beating" or "driving" game] ....

"Sitting-up at night is hardly ever sport: only where a maneater is concerned, and even then it may be mere destruction."

I have used ferret and a shotgun to take rabbits - and I have actually stalked them even with a .22 pistol; but the former could not be accurately described as hunting.

I am also in agreement on the issue of game fenced in on private land. Unless it is a truly expansive piece of real estate. But a few hundred - or even thousand - acres of fenced in land with deer or other large game becomes a safari park and they can not be accurately described as unconfined.

On the issue of ownership (and hence regulation) there are two cases in Texas that directly apply. According to Jones v. State, 45 SW2d 612, as long as indigenous wild animals remain wild and unconfined in their natural setting they are the property of the State. However, a legally captured wild animal becomes the private property of the individual, according to State v. Bartee, 894 SW2d 34, and it looks like that might at some time include those "captured" by fencing on private land.
LAK is offline  
Old June 28, 2005, 06:04 PM   #153
butch50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,403
Quote:
Are you familiar with Jack O'Connor's hunting experiences in Southern Arizona and Northern Sonora?
No, but it sounds like it was a great time and place to be at. I envy your memories and experiences, they sound great and you should write them up as short stories, I would love to read them. The brief description you provided shows that you have no small talent for story telling.

In my mind what you describe - hunting over a well traveled pathway is hunting. It is basically stand hunting that you describe.

Let me ask you this, did any of those gentlemen take a stand over a mechanized feeder and shoot deer that had become trained to come to it? If so then I would say that at that time and place they weren't hunting. Just my humble opinion.

Quote:
I am also in agreement on the issue of game fenced in on private land. Unless it is a truly expansive piece of real estate. But a few hundred - or even thousand - acres of fenced in land with deer or other large game becomes a safari park and they can not be accurately described as unconfined.
Lak: I think Stockley was dead spot on. I am going to buy and read that book, it sounds terrific.

I had not given much thought to high fencing until this thread. But it does occur to me that if you high fence an area that you are creating nothing more than an amusement park for the wealthy. I just don't see it as being anything more than that. I don't even think it should fall under the normal hunting regulations - since it is a commercial enterprise they should be able to set their own seasons and limits. Nothing that happens inside the high fence is going to affect the wild herd anyway.

In fact, maybe I should start up a business selling artifical trophy deer heads for the elite that just want a big rack on the wall. With todays technology a really fine artificial deer head could be made that would look 100% real.

Let me throw out this idea. In my mind a "Trophy" deer taken inside a high fence doesn't count. It should never be compared to a trophy wild deer. They are not the same animals and they are not taken under comparable conditions.
__________________
‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’ ~ Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446

‘‘The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.’’ ~ Patrick Henry
butch50 is offline  
Old June 29, 2005, 02:55 AM   #154
LAK
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 14, 2002
Posts: 2,251
Butch50,

Author: Stockley
Title: Stalking in the Himalayas and Northern India
on .....
http://www.bookfinder.com
... shows a number of copies from $75 to about $250 depending on condition. You might find a satisfactory copy cheaper using other book searches. I bought mine a couple of years ago for about £50 (A "very good" reading copy) from a seller in the U.K. I really like these early 20th century works; I'd have a whole library of them if I had the room and wallet!
Quote:
Let me throw out this idea. In my mind a "Trophy" deer taken inside a high fence doesn't count. It should never be compared to a trophy wild deer. They are not the same animals and they are not taken under comparable conditions.
I agree; depending on the size of the piece of land in question. It would be difficult however to establish just how extensive a tract of land should be to be considered equal to the "normal" free range of any particular species of big game animal, and that is probably fuel for a separate topic in itself.
LAK is offline  
Old June 29, 2005, 07:17 AM   #155
butch50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,403
I hadn't really thought about this before but a managed herd vs wild animals would seem be the deviding line. Comparing the take from a managed herd against the take from a wild herd doesn't seem to me to be apples to apples.
__________________
‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’ ~ Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446

‘‘The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.’’ ~ Patrick Henry
butch50 is offline  
Old June 29, 2005, 08:57 AM   #156
desert-cat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2005
Location: Tucson
Posts: 10
Butch-50,

Thanks. Whatever story-telling talent I may have is the result of sitting around ranch house tables and around campfires. I only wish that my children had the same opportunity.

In these corner of the world (Southern Arizona / Northern Sonora) we have two kinds of deer: "Coues" whitetail (max. 100 pounds, 3 1/2 ft. tall and O'Connor's favorite game) and mulies (max. 300 pounds, 4 1/2 ft tall). They are found in three different kinds of habitat: desert mule deer mostly in the plains not unlike those just around Van Horn, whitetails primarily in rolling hills areas like those around Alpine, and both, though in lower densities, in areas like those around Uvalde, Del Rio and Laredo.

In Sonora, the typical ranch is a cow-and-calf operation between 5,000 and 50,000 acres. In Arizona, the rancher more often than not only owns a few hundred acres and leases as much public land as available. In hundreds of square miles the "desert" the cover is a continuum of thorny plants of any kind (about 10 feet high), thick enough that not even from horseback you see farther than 50 yards. In more open areas the deer hide in the mezquite, paloverde and ironwood thickets along the washes. The ground is often so hard that tracks are hard to follow. If the rancher has put some salt blocks, deer will lick them too.

Here comes the issue: any livestock operation results in game herd management, and in these deserts, water is ranching, because it is WATER, not food what defines survival of both game and cattle. Whether it is a spring or a depression on the ground holding rainfall or a windmill, it is around the watering hole (the same that with cowboys, hunters and golfers) where eventually everyone gathers, mingles and fights.

Most of the hunters growing up through the depression years were incredible stalkers / drivers. They would locate a deer and, if the location was not an easy one to drag him out of, throw rocks, yell, etc., to make him move out to a more convenient location before shooting. The privileged ones would use a 30-30, a few a 30-06 and many a 22. One guy I hunted with through the 80s dropped even bighorn sheep with an open-sighted 25-20.

Old-timers, some of them who knew O'Connor and guided him through these deserts, would never use a scope but they instead waited around the rancher-made watering facility. They knew that the deer would never be far from the water.

Were they really hunting or just shooting a self-trained managed herd too?
desert-cat is offline  
Old June 29, 2005, 07:55 PM   #157
butch50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,403
That is a really really good question.

Partly it was hunting and partly it was taking advantage. If they were hunting for sport and not so much for subsistence then they were taking advantage of something that probably they shouldn't have taken advantage of - a man made source of water. I have heard of other hunters who hunt in similar circumstances (desert area water) who refuse to hunt within 1/4 mile radius of the water itself.

If they were hunting for subsistence then its all about eating and anything goes.

But perhaps the real distinction is - were they leasing hunting rights over the water hole? And even if they were, was the water dispensed only at certain times of the day?
__________________
‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’ ~ Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446

‘‘The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.’’ ~ Patrick Henry
butch50 is offline  
Old June 29, 2005, 10:52 PM   #158
desert-cat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2005
Location: Tucson
Posts: 10
Leasing a waterhole? This may sound like a WC :barf: answer, but both NO and YES.

NO: With exceptions, there was/is not an exchange of money

YES: The hunter(s) - myself included - depend(ed) on the landowners' goodwill to access the hunting areas; access could / can be gained by
a) marrying the rancher's daughter;
b) being the bank's loan officer;
c) having some skill / virtue / atribute that the rancher perceives as an advantage to his business (attorney, veterinarian, heavy machinery owner/operator, groceries warehouese owner, mechanic, family practice doctor, etc.);
d) being brought in by one of the above; and
e) sheer intimidation ("I have this government-issued hunting permit" and/or "I work for the xyz government agency and you better let me in or else")

It is not my intention bothering you or other participants with multiple examples of the above listed situations. When I began hunting in the mid 60s, many ranchers were thankful to my grandfather (a hunter, too) because he had given then credit for basic stuff (groceries, ranch supplies, etc.) in bad years. So, in a way, my grandfather bought his and my access to the same areas O'Connor liked so much to hunt, in a 50-mile radius around Nogales. Later on, I joined senior hunters from Central Sonora and I also dealt with many cattlemen in the course of my profession. The cattlemen would give me the keys to enter their ranches "but you only bring your buddy, Mr. X's son and nobody else". No money was involved, just the right relation. My buddy - an exrancher - and I had as a rule to give one roll of barbed wire to the rancher each time we went to hunt; that kept many others from joining our team. In Arizona, for several years the Arizona Game & Fish Department has fostered the Adopt-a-Ranch program, to alleviate antagonisms and create lasting relations between hunters and ranchers.

Do these non-monetary leases bother you?

Water: Save for those with sun-powered pumps, I have never been to a ranch where water is turned on/off per a schedule, not the springs, not the windmills, not the water tanks. When no rain is falling, cattle and deer come down to the only available water at about the same time everyday. Actually, in the areas where I have hunted, since mid-October to late February, you'll seldom see a wild animal coming to drink after 9 A.M. or before 4 P.M. Depending on the temperature, cattle tend to come to water later and they return to their current grazing and sleeping spot just before sunset.

Come and see by yourself!
desert-cat is offline  
Old June 30, 2005, 07:40 PM   #159
butch50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,403
Sounds like great country. Right now it is hot enough here to not want to visit a desert. Maybe in the winter though it would be a great experience.

I think I agree with those that will not hunt next to a water hole in the desert. I would want to stay some reasonable distance away from it. When the water source is rare and a requirement for the animals survival - in other words they have not choice but to come to it - then sitting right next to it "sounds" like shooting fish in a barrel. OK for subsistence hunting but not much in the way of "sport".

Or am I missing something?
__________________
‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’ ~ Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446

‘‘The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.’’ ~ Patrick Henry
butch50 is offline  
Old July 3, 2005, 04:36 PM   #160
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
I guess that as far as the high-fence stuff, there's no "one size fits all" in judging. Some of that south Texas brush country, a high fence around very few acres will hold deer that you'll never see. Some of it's just way too thick. Moving east, with the trees and undergrowth in the river bottom behind my wife's house in Georgia, a deer would have to rear up on his hind legs and wave before you could see him. Sit in a stand or else go hungry.

Sorta in the same vein, I know country where a high fence around a couple of thousand acres is a "pen"--little brush, gently rolling, no real concealment for anything bigger than a rabbit. But, add in some brush and have a bit steeper slopes and such and it's hard hunting to stalk, high fence or no.

My legs are about gone for my favorite style: Head out across my desert mule deer country, working ridges. Bucky lays up on the downwind military crest near a saddle, so you go kick him out of bed and if his horns stick out well past his ears, bust him. Or, work a long draw, making lots of racket while staying as best you can where you can see out ahead.

Nowadays, I'm more prone to hang out where I can watch a likely route to water. I gotta admit I'm getting to that stage where I'll see Bucky, think, "Gotcha!" and go on home. I can't really eat a whole deer...

, Art
Art Eatman is offline  
Old July 3, 2005, 05:06 PM   #161
butch50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,403
I think there are phases that hunters go through as they mature.

Stage 1. Young hunter - kill anything and everything that moves or sits still - quantity over quality.

Stage 2. Middle age hunter - quality over quantity - hunts for trophies mostly, and hunts for only two or three different game animals based on the type of hunting he enjoys most. Enjoys teaching the younger hunters.

Stage 3. Older hunters - killed so much game that killing more is no longer very interesting, enjoys the process of hunting, and will take very few animals and trophies aren't necessarily the goal either. Enjoys the company and the camping more than the actual hunting.

Of course these are generalizations, some hunters never mature and some mature a lot younger than others.
__________________
‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’ ~ Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446

‘‘The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.’’ ~ Patrick Henry
butch50 is offline  
Old July 10, 2005, 03:45 PM   #162
butch50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,403
Quote:
FAIR CHASE STATEMENT as defined by the Boone and Crockett Club, is the ethical, sportsmanlike, and lawful pursuit and taking of any free-ranging wild, native North American big game animal in a manner that does not give the hunter an improper advantage over such animals.
Copied directly from the Boone and Crocket Club: Couldn't have said it better myself.
__________________
‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’ ~ Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446

‘‘The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.’’ ~ Patrick Henry
butch50 is offline  
Old July 18, 2005, 03:45 AM   #163
KKirk
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2005
Location: Covington, GA
Posts: 10
Seen this and it reminded me of this thread.

Yes, it's in Texas.
KKirk is offline  
Old July 18, 2005, 07:51 PM   #164
butch50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,403
Certainly does seem to be a "Texas Toy".
__________________
‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’ ~ Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446

‘‘The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.’’ ~ Patrick Henry
butch50 is offline  
Old July 18, 2005, 10:24 PM   #165
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
Yeah, a brush-country special...

Some south Texas rancher built a hunting car from a Caddy convertible. Rifle scabbards built into the back of the front fenders, among other doo-dads. All-leather interior, built-in bar for the back seat. Dunno how much actual hunting got done.

Anybody ever see LBJ's "hunt cabin"? I haven't, but have heard stories. It was an elevated large room with all the creature comforts. It overlooked a small oat patch which was surrounded with a high fence and a powered gate. The gate would get closed around sunup, and the Mighty Hunters would ascend to the "deer stand", open a window, and Blast Bambi. :barf:

Art
Art Eatman is offline  
Old August 17, 2005, 07:36 PM   #166
JustinNC
Member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Posts: 36
Havent read the whole post but how many of you tree hugging anti baiting yuppies have tried to draw a bow with 30 does feeding below you and been successful multiple times?....Case Closed
JustinNC is offline  
Old August 17, 2005, 08:02 PM   #167
Hamhawk96R
Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 2005
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 39
I get in my truck, wearing jeans & a T-shirt, with my coffee, drive to about 1/4 miles away, get into one of my blinds about 75 yards away, pull out a book or my lap-top and start doing my homework as I wait for Bambi to come strolling out. When he comes out, I have an easy shot on a stationary target and they never usually make it more than a few yards after being shot. While this may not be overly sporting, it is still hunting and I see no ethical problems with it.
U T Air Assault

I agree...I don't think using a feeder and a stand is immoral. If you use what you kill and do it leagally, you're fine in my book. I am going on my FIRST deer hunt this October in the Southern Sierra's of California...I have to scout it first...hump my ass up a moutain and into a forest, find a site with traces of deer (recent tracks droppings, etc) and wait. Now, i probably won't get anything. But that, at least in my novice experience, is hunting. I think maybe we're dealing with an issue of symantics here. Let's call things what they are. HUNTING deer as opposed to HARVESTING deer. Both are fine if done leagally and humanely.
Hamhawk96R is offline  
Old August 17, 2005, 11:25 PM   #168
22-rimfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,323
Treednc: "Havent read the whole post but how many of you tree hugging anti baiting yuppies have tried to draw a bow with 30 does feeding below you and been successful multiple times?....Case Closed"

I have no earthly idea what in the heck you are talking about?? What is your point or are you just trying to be insulting? Great post for No. 2.
22-rimfire is offline  
Old August 20, 2005, 09:10 PM   #169
JustinNC
Member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Posts: 36
Not trying to be insulting. Actually my first two posts were within the first hour I that I found this sight. I just hate hearing how easy hunting is with baiting. If you are relatively consistant in bow hunting under an automatic feeder in Texas or anywhere else for that matter when you may have 30 sets of eyes under you at once feeding at that feeder, then I appologize with the upmost respect for your opinion of baiting.
JustinNC is offline  
Old August 21, 2005, 07:57 AM   #170
butch50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,403
If you are having that much difficulty "hunting" deer over an automatic bait feeder, and getting a good shot off with 30 deer under you - then apparently "the baiting and shooting method" is acceptable for your level of skill, and perhaps the skilled bow-hunters out there will enjoy better hunting since you have decided to stay in one place.

Not trying to be insulting or anything.
__________________
‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’ ~ Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446

‘‘The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.’’ ~ Patrick Henry

Last edited by butch50; August 21, 2005 at 10:51 AM.
butch50 is offline  
Old August 22, 2005, 12:59 PM   #171
2rugers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2005
Location: texas
Posts: 762
although getting "A" deer over your bait station may not be that hard, try and get "THE" deer and let's see if there is a difference. we feed protein year round on our small place here in texas and i thought getting that big buck i had been seeing at the feeder during the summer was a given. not so. opening morning of bow season i was on a branch in a tree 40 yds from the feeder. no big buck. it was almost like he had read about the opener in the paper. i took one shot at him two weeks into the season, but nowhwhere near the feeder. watching through my spotting scope i finally recognized him coming to the feeder one night well after dark. the last morning on the last day i finally scored him, but only after watching him continuously change his pattern, if you can call it that, all month. here in texas they learn to be wary of feeders during season quick and you will only find the really young or old there once the season opens.
2rugers is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.13567 seconds with 10 queries