July 3, 2018, 05:35 AM | #76 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Somewhere on the Southern shore of Lake Travis, TX
Posts: 2,603
|
Quote:
__________________
Hanlon's Razor "Do not invoke conspiracy as explanation when ignorance and incompetence will suffice, as conspiracy implies intelligence and organization." |
|
July 3, 2018, 05:40 AM | #77 | |
Member
Join Date: June 20, 2018
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
I guess I will have to instead go with ballistics gel. The round enters target and creates a permanent wound cavity. The larger temporary wound cavity made is my justification of energy over mass. I've also never shot ballistics gel. My opinion is in no ways fact. I think we are getting to beating a dead horse with this. There is no definitive proof stated in this thread for either mass or energy, just opinions.
__________________
"People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people." "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." |
|
July 3, 2018, 10:57 AM | #78 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
.50 BMG & shockwave
Quote:
I shoot a lot of .50 BMG, and seen someone get (almost) too close to the muzzle on firing. Other than some very unpleasant hot gas getting very close (and an ear problem), their arm didn't come off and skin remained intact. I'll post a picture of the gas if that helps. Here's a link to the pic: https://i.imgur.com/p0EBbQy.mp4 There's a shockwave, on a really good monitor you can see it, but look at the shaking of the shooting mat. If a .50 BMG had enough energy in the shock wave to take off an arm or kill by (non contact) concussion, it would easily tear off the front of the shooting pad. (But the gas does a great job of clearing weeds)
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes Last edited by TXAZ; July 3, 2018 at 11:50 AM. Reason: Adding pic of .50 BMG gas / shockwave |
|
July 3, 2018, 03:42 PM | #79 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,832
|
I have been blown off the turret of an M60 tank by the blast from a 105mm main gun, (and, the sob was firing Sabot!!)
compared to that, a .50BMG isn't so much. Some years ago, there was a rifle called the Desert Rhino. .50 BMG and a 16" barrel with a HUGE muzzle brake. The writer said that while recoil was ..tolerable..what bothered him most was the 3rd shot cracked his shooting glasses from the blast. kill a deer with a .50 BMG slug without hitting the deer? No. kill a squirrel with a "near miss", possible. My grandfather taught me how to "bark" squirrels with a 12ga. It does work, kill's 'em DRT. Shot at a ground squirrel once with a .45ACP. Missed him, hit the rock he was on, he flew about a dozen yards in the air, landed dead. Small animals can be killed from a near (enough) miss. Larger ones, no, ain't happening. There was a GI in WWII (battle of the bulge if I remember right) was grazed on the neck by an 88mm round from a Tiger tank. Messed him up, but he survived.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
|