The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 3, 2018, 05:35 AM   #76
B.L.E.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Somewhere on the Southern shore of Lake Travis, TX
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
(But I'd still rather be in a collision with a 40 ton truck with 1000 ft-lbs of energy than hit by 1000 ft-lbs of electrons.)
A 40 ton projectile would have to be traveling 0.61 mph in order to have 1000 ft-lb of KE. It would likely just harmlessly push you out of its way.
__________________
Hanlon's Razor
"Do not invoke conspiracy as explanation when ignorance and incompetence will suffice, as conspiracy implies intelligence and organization."
B.L.E. is offline  
Old July 3, 2018, 05:40 AM   #77
Kirosha
Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2018
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleA View Post
I think this claim has been debunked. At least this guy thinks so and I'm inclined to agree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrHpe5Z93wM&t=317s
I'd argue that a drone and plastic don't compare to soft tissue and all but I don't shoot .50 BMG, don't kill deer when I miss, or go for head shots on deer. If it is fake, it is only a representation of what I mean by energy on target.

I guess I will have to instead go with ballistics gel. The round enters target and creates a permanent wound cavity. The larger temporary wound cavity made is my justification of energy over mass.

I've also never shot ballistics gel. My opinion is in no ways fact.

I think we are getting to beating a dead horse with this. There is no definitive proof stated in this thread for either mass or energy, just opinions.
__________________
"People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people."

"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it."
Kirosha is offline  
Old July 3, 2018, 10:57 AM   #78
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
.50 BMG & shockwave
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleA View Post
Not to nitpick too much but post #64 has a link to a Youtube video that claims a near miss with a .50 BMG killed a deer.

"Unbelievable .50 BMG Whitetail Deer Hunt at Legends Ranch"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P3u...youtu.be&t=170

I think this claim has been debunked. At least this guy thinks so and I'm inclined to agree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrHpe5Z93wM&t=317s
It has been totally debunked. The bullet went through the eye which was the spray in the video.

I shoot a lot of .50 BMG, and seen someone get (almost) too close to the muzzle on firing.
Other than some very unpleasant hot gas getting very close (and an ear problem), their arm didn't come off and skin remained intact.
I'll post a picture of the gas if that helps.

Here's a link to the pic:
https://i.imgur.com/p0EBbQy.mp4
There's a shockwave, on a really good monitor you can see it, but look at the shaking of the shooting mat. If a .50 BMG had enough energy in the shock wave to take off an arm or kill by (non contact) concussion, it would easily tear off the front of the shooting pad. (But the gas does a great job of clearing weeds)
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes

Last edited by TXAZ; July 3, 2018 at 11:50 AM. Reason: Adding pic of .50 BMG gas / shockwave
TXAZ is offline  
Old July 3, 2018, 03:42 PM   #79
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,832
I have been blown off the turret of an M60 tank by the blast from a 105mm main gun, (and, the sob was firing Sabot!!)

compared to that, a .50BMG isn't so much.

Some years ago, there was a rifle called the Desert Rhino. .50 BMG and a 16" barrel with a HUGE muzzle brake. The writer said that while recoil was ..tolerable..what bothered him most was the 3rd shot cracked his shooting glasses from the blast.

kill a deer with a .50 BMG slug without hitting the deer? No.

kill a squirrel with a "near miss", possible. My grandfather taught me how to "bark" squirrels with a 12ga. It does work, kill's 'em DRT.

Shot at a ground squirrel once with a .45ACP. Missed him, hit the rock he was on, he flew about a dozen yards in the air, landed dead. Small animals can be killed from a near (enough) miss. Larger ones, no, ain't happening.

There was a GI in WWII (battle of the bulge if I remember right) was grazed on the neck by an 88mm round from a Tiger tank. Messed him up, but he survived.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03606 seconds with 8 queries