The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 18, 2011, 06:12 PM   #1
chasep255
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 727
Bullet Button in NJ

I know that CA residents often use a bullet button to have all of the "evil" junk they want on their semi-autos. My question is would one of these devices make it so my gun would be NJ legal? Do could I have say and AR with the bayonet lug, threading, folding stock, and flash hider if I ave one of these bullet buttons?
chasep255 is offline  
Old March 18, 2011, 06:48 PM   #2
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,459
What is a bullet button?

Just a guess, but I suspect that California law is different from New Jersey law and that the short answer to your question is probably going to be "No."
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 18, 2011, 07:45 PM   #3
Frank Ettin
Staff
 
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguila Blanca
What is a bullet button?
It's a magazine release modified in such a way as to require some sort of tool to operate. Under the vagaries of California law, if the magazine release can not be operated simply with one's finger but requires a tool, the rifle will not be considered to have a detachable magazine. Don't ask me to explain or make sense of it, because I can't. That's just how it is.

BTW it's called a "bullet button" because the tool that can be used to operate the magazine release is most commonly the point of a bullet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguila Blanca
...Just a guess, but I suspect that California law is different from New Jersey law and that the short answer to your question is probably going to be "No."
I suspect that you're correct. I have no clue what New Jersey law is, and the details count here. The exact language of the law, and any administrative rulings or court decision applying it, matter.
Frank Ettin is offline  
Old March 19, 2011, 12:36 AM   #4
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,459
Interesting. I knew that California only allowed ARs with non-detachable magazines, but I thought they were an integral part of the receiver and had a trap door or something for loading.

From the NJ State Police web site:
Quote:
13:54-1.2 Definitions
The words and terms used in this chapter shall have the following meanings:

...

"Assault firearms" means:
1. The following firearms:
Algimec AGM1 type
Any shotgun with a revolving cylinder such as the "Street Sweeper" or "Striker 12"
Armalite AR-180 type
Australian Automatic Arms SAR
Avtomat Kalashnikov type semi-automatic firearms
Beretta AR-70 and BM59 semi-automatic firearms
Bushmaster Assault Rifle
Calico M-900 Assault carbine and M-900
CETME G3
Chartered Industries of Singapore SR-88 type
Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series
Daewoo K-1, K-2, Max 1 and Max 2, AR 100 types
Demro TAC-1 carbine type
Encom MP-9 and MP-45 carbine types
FAMAS MAS223 types
FN-FAL, FN-LAR, or FN-FNC type semi-automatic firearms
Franchi SPAS 12 and LAW 12 shotguns
G3SA type
Galil type
Heckler and Koch HK91, HK93, HK94, MP5, PSG-1
Intratec TEC 9 and 22 semi-automatic firearms
M1 carbine type
M14S type
MAC 10, MAC 11, MAC 11-9 mm carbine type firearms
PJK M-68 carbine type
Plainfield Machine Company Carbine
Ruger K-Mini-14/5 and Mini-14/5
SIG AMT, SIG 550SP, SIG 551SP, SIG PE-57 types
SKS with detachable magazine type
Spectre Auto carbine type
Springfield Armory BM59 and SAR-48 type
Sterling MK-6, MK-7 and SAR types
Steyr A.U.G. semi-automatic firearms
USAS 12 semi-automatic type shotgun
Uzi type semi-automatic firearms
Valmet M62, M71S, M76, or M78 type semi-automatic firearms
Weaver Arm Nighthawk

2. Any firearm manufactured under any designation which is substantially identical to any of the firearms listed in paragraph (1) above;

3. A semi-automatic shotgun with either a magazine capacity exceeding six rounds, a folding stock or a pistol grip; or a semi-automatic rifle with a fixed magazine capacity exceeding 15 rounds. For purposes of this paragraph, "semi-automatic" means a firearm which fires a single projectile for each pull of the trigger and is self-reloading or automatically chambers a round, cartridge or bullet. For purposes of this paragraph "pistol grip" means a well defined handle, similar to that found on a handgun, that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon, and which permits the shotgun to be held and fired with one hand;
So New Jersey is more restrictive than the former Federal AWB, in that if it has a fixed magazine exceeding 15 rounds, it's no good. However, the law does not appear to address detachable magazines at all. My guess is that's because there's an exhaustive list of "evil" weapons above, and the state would argue that near clones with detachable magazines of any capacity are "substantially identical" to one of the named firearms.

As to the original question, to be conservative I would say that New Jersey does not appear to have defined "detachable." I hope fiddletown will concur that in court, if a term is not defined in a statute, it defers to a standard dictionary. To my layman's understanding, "detachable" would have to mean "capable of being detached." And if I can use a bullet to push a button and remove the magazine -- I think there's at least a reasonable supposition that (outside of California, of course) the magazine is "detachable."
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 19, 2011, 12:51 AM   #5
Frank Ettin
Staff
 
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
Several things --

[1] One issue would be the "substantially identical" language of paragraph 2. Is a rifle that differs from those listed only insofar as its magazine requires a simple tool to detach, different enough so that it's no longer "substantially identical"?

[2] I have no idea how a New Jersey court would rule on that question. Personally, unless there were a decision of the highest appellate court for New Jersey saying explicitly, in so many words, that a rifle with a bullet button was not substantially identical, I wouldn't chance it.

[3] And I agree that I wouldn't bet against a New Jersey court deciding the a magazine that could be removed by using a simple tool on the magazine release was detachable.
Frank Ettin is offline  
Old March 19, 2011, 05:26 PM   #6
silentargus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2010
Posts: 146
Not offering any deep commentary, but I hadn't ever heard of the bullet button phenomenon until I started posting on gun forums. If such a device could prevent a firearm from being classified as an "assault weapon" under NJ law then I strongly suspect they would be a lot more popular around here.
silentargus is offline  
Old June 3, 2011, 08:37 PM   #7
DrJohnMARoy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2010
Posts: 1
CA AG agrees that a Bullet Button has a fixed magazine

The CA attorney general in the response to a bullet button case said that a gun with a BB has a "fixed magazine". Here is the link to the response issued on June 6, 2011. Look at the top of page 12. http://ia600507.us.archive.org/10/it...25676.26.1.pdf

I am no lawyer but that seems to say quite clearly that a gun with a BB now has a fixed (not detachable) magazine. So it is not "substantiality identical", but the magazine used with the BB would need to be 15 rounds or less.

So a non-named gun (like say an FN SCAR 16) with a bullet button and a 10 round fixed magazine could have a threaded barrel and a collapsable stock and anything else.

But who the he'll knows in this crazy state.
DrJohnMARoy is offline  
Old June 3, 2011, 09:01 PM   #8
Frank Ettin
Staff
 
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJohnMARoy
The CA attorney general ...
That's fine in California. But the OP asked about New Jersey.

The California Attorney General and his opinions don't mean anything in New Jersey. Beside, you're looking at a Memorandum of Points and Authorities which really has no application outside the case in which it was filed.

So none of what you're pointing to has any application in New Jersey, nor does it help with the OP's question.

Last edited by Frank Ettin; June 3, 2011 at 11:05 PM.
Frank Ettin is offline  
Old June 3, 2011, 09:07 PM   #9
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJohnMARoy
The CA attorney general in the response to a bullet button case said that a gun with a BB has a "fixed magazine". Here is the link to the response issued on June 6, 2011. Look at the top of page 12. http://ia600507.us.archive.org/10/it...25676.26.1.pdf

I am no lawyer but that seems to say quite clearly that a gun with a BB now has a fixed (not detachable) magazine. So it is not "substantiality identical", but the magazine used with the BB would need to be 15 rounds or less.
But ... the question pertains to New Jersey. New Jersey is in no way constrained to accept the opinion (not codified in law, and certainly not in NJ law) of the CA Attorney General that a bullet button equates to "fixed."
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old June 4, 2011, 07:25 PM   #10
Dead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 5, 2000
Location: AoW Land, USA
Posts: 1,968
I am certain that NJ would consider a magazine that is designed to be REMOVED in normal operation of the firearm (even if a simple tool is required) to be a detachable magazine. When considering anything related to NJ simply throw logic out the window, and yes apples are oranges in NJ...
__________________
Dead [Black Ops]
www.therallypoint.org
Dead is offline  
Old June 19, 2011, 05:40 PM   #11
Ztek69
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2011
Location: Dandridge TN
Posts: 6
The best suggestion is

to get out of The Peoples Republic of NJ like I did.
Ztek69 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04432 seconds with 10 queries