|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 27, 2012, 09:02 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 12, 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 346
|
Cimarron quality issues
I have always been impressed with Cimarron (Uberti). But recently a group of us ordered four Man with No Name conversion revolvers. The screw that secures the loading gate would back out easily and allow the gate to come in contact with the cyclinder, in turn seizing the cylinder. One of the four pistols had gouges all over the outside of the engraved cylinder.
I contacted Cimarron and they told me the loading gate screw is a known issue and sent me four oversized screws. Why would they ship out firearms with known issues? And why don't they inspect what they sell? Not really looking for answers to those questions from you guys, just venting. |
September 27, 2012, 09:09 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: June 24, 2012
Location: WA
Posts: 36
|
Spring of this year I purchased a brand new Cimarron 1897 Pump Shotgun for $600 (from a good seller on GB.com. it never worked right and always jammed. Instead of sending it back and risking getting another defective shotgun, I handed it over to a "cowboy gunsmith". He told me it was assembled incorrect, and a "T-Block" was not manufactured correct. It is now working just OK to good.
I would place Cimarron quality right down there with Taurus. |
September 27, 2012, 09:24 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 2012
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 2,989
|
I have only had experience with one Cimarron revolver, the Model P .44 Special I recently bought. However, I've got two other Uberti revolvers, from Stoeger. All three of these have been excellent quality and well made and finished guns.
I don't know where the final inspection is made, here in the US, or at the factory in Italy. But certainly any problems need to be brought to the attention of the importer. They have a reputation to protect, and most are willing to take steps to correct problems. Bob Wright |
September 27, 2012, 10:55 PM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 10, 2009
Posts: 974
|
havent anyone else here worked in a factory? the motto is , functional but slightly "off" product is good when it leaves the factory, it means PROFIT to the company even if a month later an angry customer demands a 12 cent replacement screw to fix the problem
|
September 28, 2012, 03:47 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2012
Location: NV
Posts: 743
|
#2
Zekest Crowe Quote:
Now, you come on line, and you dog a company that might want to make thing's right for you, and to there products. I think a reaction like that is kind of childish. I feel people like that doesn't do anybody any favor's. QC should be addressed to the company direct instead of trying to destroy a company and directly compare them to Taurus. Point? One bad apple can spoil the whole batch. Who's the bad apple now? |
|
September 29, 2012, 08:08 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 953
|
Quote:
Stu |
|
September 29, 2012, 11:01 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
|
|
October 1, 2012, 03:40 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 12, 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 346
|
Update
Update:
The dealer took back both of the problem pistols an ordered two more. Cimarron sent me four larger loading gate screws for each of the four revolvers ordered just in case any of them turned out to have the same loading gate issue. I get my new one the end of October (that's when I see my favorite gun dealer back in my home town at our local gun show). |
October 1, 2012, 04:09 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
Of all the things that can go wrong with a gun, that doesn't sound like enough to cause a bad reputation.
It shouldn't put anyone off the maker.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
October 1, 2012, 07:40 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
I have twelve Uberti revolvers, five of them Cimarron imported. I haven't had a problem with any of them. I also have two Uberti rifles. Love them as well. I don't just target shoot with them. I use them as everyday "farm" guns.
|
October 2, 2012, 03:40 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Location: NC Piedmont/Foothills
Posts: 666
|
Screwy Screwy
Experience with the 1873 SAA and its faithful clones has led me to take a screwdriver along on range trips whenever I plan to shoot more than about 50 rounds so I can go over the gun and cinch the screws down. Most often, it's the ejector rod housing screw that loosens, but any of them can back up from their moorings sooner or later. Just part of the charm of the single-action revolver, and not really a major issue for me.
__________________
If your front porch collapses and kills more than three dogs...You just might be a redneck |
October 2, 2012, 08:55 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 12, 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 346
|
I was spoiled by my Navy Arms replica of the Remington 1875 New Army revolver in .45 Colt I bought nearly thirty five years ago. It still runs like a top and has had thousands of rounds through it. All my other cowboy guns are modern and most Ruger. Of my fifty or so rifles my Uberti Henry rifle (also in .45 Colt) is by far my favorite.
I'm a professional project manager and we have to test for quality in something every day. I'm used to ensuring we deliver projects and products exactly per the requirements. I was kind of suprised that a known issue was in the market for sale. Especially from someone as good as Uberti. It probably would have surprised me even more if it had been Ruger. Not the first time poor quality has slipped past a manufactuer. I bought one of the first Smith and Wesson built Walther PPK/S in .380. It had a hammer block recall that was not well published. My pistol went off in my house when I was preparing it for carry. I was in my gun room, put a round into battery, and dropped the decocker to put the pistol into a "safe" mode. The hammer block is supposed to prevent any contact between the hammer and firing pin. The pistol discharged and shot a hole clean through a Smith & Wesson aluminum performance center case. Needless to say, Smith & Wesson traded me any gun I wanted for that one. |
October 2, 2012, 09:40 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2012
Location: Richmond, Va.
Posts: 353
|
"Smith and Wesson built Walther PPK/S in .380. It had a hammer block recall that was not well published. My pistol went off in my house when I was preparing it for carry. I was in my gun room, put a round into battery, and dropped the decocker to put the pistol into a "safe" mode. The hammer block is supposed to prevent any contact between the hammer and firing pin. The pistol discharged and..........."
That's something that has always worried me. Ones that I could put in 'safe' before putting a round into battery, I did, so that that hammer would just follow the bolt home instead of just snapping down.
__________________
Frank-- Member, GoA, NRA-ILA, SAF, NRA Life Member |
October 19, 2012, 01:18 PM | #14 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2005
Location: North central Ohio
Posts: 7,486
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
ONLY AN ARMED PEOPLE CAN BE TRULY FREE ; ONLY AN UNARMED PEOPLE CAN EVER BE ENSLAVED ...Aristotle NRA Benefactor Life Member |
||
October 20, 2012, 03:38 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 18, 2010
Posts: 208
|
I bought a cimmaron 1873 Model P 7 1/2 inch 45 LC used 2 years ago..I put about 300 rounds through it since then without a hitch..I love the piece.
Z |
|
|