March 26, 2009, 07:26 PM | #51 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
Everyone knows that AKs are gods gift to third world robustness, whopee-do. When our GI's are allowed to use their rifles as stools in front of the fire after a hard day of pangaing women and children, then we can switch to AKs WildhowdidaksgetinvolvedhereAlaska ™ |
|
March 26, 2009, 08:51 PM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 938
|
your post did not specify such a parameters.
If that is truely what you meant, it has some merit. ---------- The origional post was actualy about HK MR556 Vs. a Colt AR...that then degraded to a direct vs. piston action... and then your post came about how a gas psiton is just another part to break...yada yada yada.. post drift My Ak bullies your Honor student AK |
March 26, 2009, 10:36 PM | #53 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
WilddriftinglikebrownianmotionAlaska TM |
|
March 26, 2009, 11:09 PM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Quote:
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
|
March 27, 2009, 09:22 AM | #55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 28, 2004
Posts: 1,784
|
Bah! Direct Impingement was a bad idea from the get go. Yes, you get less mass but that's about it. Well, the rcoil impulse is slightly less than a gas piston design.
For a COMBAT RIFLE gas-piston is the de rigeur all around the world. Yet, the ergos of the AR-15 is second to none. MATE THE TWO AND YOU HAVE A BETTER RIFLE/CARBINE. End of story. Playing with statistics can be very misleading and the "1.1% more reliable" claim is an example of same. Adding a short stroke or long stroke piston to an AR-15/M16 and the result is... an M16/AR15 but with a gas piston. Whether or not HK does a better job at engineering than Colt is another matter. I think in many areas they do. It's ze German vay, nein? Yet in other areas maybe not. They are more thorough and perhaps THE most thorough of all small arms manufacturers today. This tends to make one very stubborn and resistant to change - an area where we tend to shine a bit more. This argument is like arguing about my favorite car manufacturer - Porsche. The GT3 is the "perfect" car FOR ME but.... as an auto engineer and race car engineer enthusiast there's no way in Hell given a clean sheet of paper I'd hang the engine behind the rear axles. And neither, apparently, would Porsche. Witness the Boxter/Caiman and Carrera GT. Progress never stops. Get over it.
__________________
"Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants, it is the creed of slaves." ~ William Pitt, 1783 |
March 27, 2009, 10:28 AM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 21, 2009
Posts: 494
|
You know I understand blind stubborn adherence to a design, I myself think the M14 is the cat's ass, but I think if the AR guys take off the fanboy hats for second they have to see that the next long term battle rifle (if it is a gas gun) will almost certainly have a piston instead of DI that is just the way things are headed. Will it be the H&K? Probably not. I myself like the SCAR but Colt will come out with something and we will see who wins the game that is the selection process for a fatty thing like that whenever the military gets the gum-shin.
|
March 27, 2009, 11:41 AM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 938
|
Quote:
A) you are a better shot B) the conditions were not what we are discussing, that is insainly "adverse" (this would show up any differances) C) The scoring method ( this is just a guess) but do all Center mass hits count the same? D) the Ak was NEVER intended to be a target/D.M. rifle. That was left to the Druganov. |
|
March 27, 2009, 11:47 AM | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 668
|
Quote:
We should also not accept the reality of the conflicts in Iraq and Astan, where the enemy essential hides and uses roadside IEDs because actually firing on our guys with their magnificient AK and AKS rifles results in rapid death for the insurgents. Last edited by Kmar40; March 27, 2009 at 11:57 AM. |
|
March 27, 2009, 11:48 AM | #59 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 668
|
Quote:
|
|
March 27, 2009, 11:50 AM | #60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 668
|
Quote:
PS I carry HK at work. I'd trade it for several pistols that cost half as much in a heartbeat. Our were recalled shortly after we got them. We also have USCs. Also being phased out. No advantage over our M4s. We also purchased a ton of those HK Ar mags. They are training only now. Please don't tell me about HK being perfect. |
|
March 27, 2009, 11:53 AM | #61 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 668
|
Quote:
And frankly, we won't. Beoyotch all you want but the M16 has already served as the standard issue rifle longer than the M1 and M14 combined (approximately 30 years). It's not going anywhere until something substantially better comes along. 1% increased reliability isn't substantial. Moreover accuracy is not even a tradeoff that many of us want to make. Quote:
Last edited by Kmar40; March 27, 2009 at 12:11 PM. |
||
Tags |
ar-15 , colt , h&k , hekcler and koch , targgus |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|