|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 8, 2019, 07:54 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
To discuss the reasoning behind these behaviors wanders into general politics and the psychology of partisanship, I'm afraid.
The Trump analysis of why semi auto rifles are owned for entertainment, ranks in there with DeVos wanting guns in schools for bear attacks There is a lack of real appreciation of RKBA issues among those who should know better. It's just a slogan for them to defend the RKBA but really not know about or consider the issues. We've discussed NRA motivations extensively from a marketing and financial demographic selection of their utterances.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
June 9, 2019, 03:35 AM | #27 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
I would remind everyone that Republican Trump was at one time Democrat Trump.
I said it before, and I'll say it again, I believe Trump will do what he believes is best for Trump. If that happens to be in line with our belief in RKBA, fine. If not, well, considering the other side's publicly stated platform and goals, we're considered pretty much a "captive audience".
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
June 9, 2019, 07:26 AM | #28 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,457
|
Quote:
Quote:
In the wake of such a high profile multiple murder, had BHO and a co-operative congress settled for merely a poorly reasoned administrative re-classification of just the bump-stock, we'd likely be celebrating that victory. BHO arguably benefitted from clashes with the NRA; DJT doesn't (at least currently). In light of 44 AMP's analysis, making it clear to DJT that making words in that interview into policy would not be in his interest, and that fighting that impulse earns support (a lesson he grasped with Leonard Leo) makes sense.
__________________
http://www.npboards.com/index.php |
||
June 9, 2019, 08:59 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2005
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 1,804
|
The Donald is a typical NYC moderate and a businessman of sorts.
He is only interested in how any policy shakes out to benefit him. |
June 9, 2019, 10:46 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
Come on now president Trump, you need to dance with those who brung you!
|
June 9, 2019, 11:26 AM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2018
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 1,475
|
Quote:
__________________
PhormerPhantomPhlyer "Tools not Trophies” |
|
June 9, 2019, 11:49 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
I think anyone but a cognitively blind true believer understands Trump's behavior by now. Is there more to say? We are saying the same thing, need we continue.
The problem is preventing another impulse ban or counterproductive blather session.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
June 9, 2019, 12:07 PM | #33 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
We are talking to each other here. I doubt Trump reads this forum at all, let alone on a regular basis. In the time you take to read this thread and make a post, you can submit a comment directly to the White House. Will President Trump himself read your message? Unlikely -- but his staff will read it, and they will count it, and they will inform him of the direction public opinion is trending.
So, to paraphrase what they say about Chicago politics, "Write early and write often." I posted the link previously. Here it is again: https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ "Just do it!" |
June 9, 2019, 12:18 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,457
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.npboards.com/index.php |
|
June 9, 2019, 12:49 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 1,739
|
Ya'll can tweet D.J.T.
I tweeted Trump one & only time after he'd won the presidential election. He tweeted back to me --- "I'm watching you!!!" --- along with a rubber stamp portrait of himself.
__________________
That rifle hanging on the wall of the working class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." --- George Orwell |
June 9, 2019, 02:29 PM | #36 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
In years past, politicians used to say that letters counted more than phone calls, because it's easier to pick up the phone than to sit down, write a letter, put it in an envelope, address the envelope, stamp it, and mail it. Staff kept track of numbers of letters and phone calls on each side of all issues. Letters counted for twice the importance of phone calls. Then we got e-mail, so now the staffers need to track letters, phone calls, and e-mails. And they do that, but I don't know if there's a hierarchy any more. If so, I would assume that the written letter still counts most heavily, followed by the phone call, followed by e-mail. Tweets? Who monitors Trump's Twitter account? Do we know that the White House staff actually read and tabulate all the tweets that go to the President's account? I'm not going to count on that when it's an issue on which I want my opinion to be known and counted. I'll use e-mail to the official address, and the site www.usa.gov has links to contact not only the President but also your own senators and congressman. You can compose a message in Notepad and copy and paste it into messages to all your elected representatives. I recommend that rather than relying on Twitter tweets to be counted. And I think we should not be reluctant to send multiple messages on issues about which we care. You can be sure the anti-gun side is flooding Washington with their messages. The NY Times has weighed in on the subject: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/u...gislators.html Quote:
|
||
June 9, 2019, 04:16 PM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
You all might want to read this thread: https://www.texaschlforum.com/viewto...p?f=94&t=96102
Charles Cotton is a higher up in the NRA and offers this somewhere in thread: Quote:
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
|
June 10, 2019, 08:52 AM | #38 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Posts have been deleted for delving into the President's personal history and for going too far into the weeds of electoral politics. Let's keep this related to firearms and the policies.
Quote:
Quote:
The claim they're playing 4D chess in a secret room somewhere isn't enough.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
June 10, 2019, 09:07 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
If suppressors were to be banned, does anyone have any idea of what such a ban would look like? Would it be confiscatory or simply a ban on making and selling any new suppressors. Or, has this not even been discussed yet?
|
June 10, 2019, 11:13 AM | #40 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
He doesn't have to ban them. He can just reduce staff at the NFA branch or instruct them to impose a moratorium on reviewing new applications. Either would please the gun-control lobby.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
June 10, 2019, 11:29 AM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
Quote:
And there you go, a classic bureaucratic solution that makes some left leaning constituants very happy yet provides cover from RKBA'ers being able to say 'they didn't ban anything'. Or they could go the opposite way and issue a regulation there will be a review of every Class III item, and your time to show up at XXXXX location with the item and paperwork is ________. It's not in the interest of the executive branch or centric and conservative members of congress' to allow an outright ban. But they can make ownership very painful. But we'll see.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
|
June 10, 2019, 11:46 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
SCOTUS just turned down a silencer case without comment or dissent. Someone can find the details. CNN said Trump administration is ok with that.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
June 10, 2019, 12:45 PM | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Quote:
|
|
June 10, 2019, 01:10 PM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,238
|
Hope no one uses a scope, sling, flashlight or BUIS during a high profile crime or they may want to ban those too... after all they are only accessories.
Since the receivers are considered to be what constitutes a “firearm” they could ban everything except the receiver and say your right to keep and bear receivers have not been infringed. The proverbial slippery slope, but appears that this will go away as other issues have. |
June 10, 2019, 01:32 PM | #45 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
At first I was aghast at Cotton's words there. Reading the actual conversation and responses, i.e. "context," of how he wrote them tempered my feelings a little bit. That being said, Tom Servo hit is with this... Quote:
Quote:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/10/polit...aid/index.html
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018 https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946 |
|||
June 10, 2019, 02:19 PM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,457
|
Quote:
Anygunanywhere accuses the NRA of selling out (throwing their owners "under the bus") on the bumpstock issue. Cotton offers an explanation about why they did that, but doesn't contest that they did.
__________________
http://www.npboards.com/index.php |
|
June 10, 2019, 02:25 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 15, 2011
Location: N Ireland. UK.
Posts: 1,809
|
Ironically there is no problem for gun owners in the UK getting suppressors, for hearing protection.
|
June 10, 2019, 06:28 PM | #48 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
sorry for the sarcasm...couldn't resist.. Still, easy to get a suppressor for guns that are kept in an approved shooting club's safe(s) or at a police station? Isn't that the rule over there, now?? But I do see your point, in some places suppressors are actually required (for hunting), from what I've heard. There are a number of US laws that, to me, make less than no sense at all. Gun control is in that group.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
June 10, 2019, 08:33 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 358
|
In a common sense world, we would be upset that the gov't is making shooters put suppressors on every gun they shoot.
They would use the same playbook used on smokers by demonizing those who not just harm themselves but also are inconsiderate of their neighbors by shooting guns without one. In the real world, this makes as much sense as outlawing mufflers on a car. Admittedly, I am out of touch.
__________________
L2R |
June 10, 2019, 09:39 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
The implication of Cotton's post is that the supposed gun supporting GOP members of the House and Senate and the President would have supported an AWB in a moral panic. Or if Trump didn't, there was enough GOP support for that ban to override a veto. The Democrats couldn't have passed such a ban on their own.
That's not a good thing. Cotton's post of secret processes doesn't inspire confidence that the next rampage wouldn't lead to another moral panic that this time would ban MSSAs. Throw silencers on the alter. Eventually, the priests of secret knowledge will run out of sacred goats.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
|
|