|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 27, 2016, 09:37 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 549
|
Noise Cancelling Earmuffs
Wondering if anyone could suggest a good pair of ear muffs that allow any noise under a certain db to be heard but cancel out any noise over that threshold. Say a pair that cancels any noise over 70 db but allows anything >69 db through to be heard.
I'm afraid I'm not doing a very job of describing what I'm looking for... Any ideas?
__________________
BOOM |
July 27, 2016, 09:58 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
|
Not sure what the decibel canceling level is for them but there are a lot of electronic muffs that should work for you. Look them up and the specifications should tell you if they will do what you want.
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time. No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it. |
July 27, 2016, 10:32 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 9, 2014
Posts: 645
|
I'm not sure of the decibel levels but I have several pair of the electric muffs and all are about the same. You can hear everything around you and even distant noises. A mid level clap of the hands will trigger the muffs to work. I make my kids wear them and I love them.
|
July 27, 2016, 11:29 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
I have a couple pair of these: Walker's Razor Slim ... muffs
They work reasonably well. I haven't had them long enough to find out whether or not they're a "good" option - particularly in the longevity/durability category. With or without earplugs underneath, they work well enough for me to hear other people approaching the range (out in the boonies and I'm usually there alone in the morning); and they're nice to have when shooting with or instructing a child*. That model also has a 'line-in' jack, so I can listen to music or the radio when I'm at the range alone by hooking up my phone, but I can still hear what's going on around me if I balance the volume correctly (phone output volume vs earmuff volume). *If you use them with a child young enough to not really understand how to operate the volume and set a comfortable level, be sure to adjust the volume with your own ears before putting them on the kid's head.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
July 27, 2016, 11:36 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
|
First, understand that "noise cancelling earmuffs" are not what you get in shooting ear protection. You get a circuit that cuts off electronic transmission of sound at the upper limit, usually 85 dB which is a number they get from OSHA. The hearing protection is entirely due to the insulation.
A good muff at 30 dB NRR is the same protection whether it is passive or electronic. The electronics are good if you need to hear chit chat between shots. Like if you are a range officer or competition RO/SO. |
July 28, 2016, 01:46 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 27, 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 329
|
They're nice if you have lost most of your hearing, as I have. I have Walker's Alpha and Peltors......I prefer the Peltors.
|
July 28, 2016, 01:36 PM | #7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2016
Posts: 10
|
I bought some electronic peltors at walmart a few months ago. I showed them the amazon price on my phone and got them for about 15 or 20 bux cheaper than what walmart had them priced at.
|
July 28, 2016, 02:16 PM | #9 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,457
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
http://www.npboards.com/index.php Last edited by zukiphile; August 1, 2016 at 08:42 AM. |
||
July 28, 2016, 03:18 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
Walker and Peltor make some of the best at the higher cost end. The db reduction rating really doesn't give you the true story, but at least it lets you compare models to some degree.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
July 28, 2016, 03:40 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,896
|
Let's put it this way, My Peltor-7s actually improve my hi-freq hearing.
(But don't tell my wife) |
July 29, 2016, 04:01 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Location: Fort Pierce, Florida
Posts: 381
|
I am very happy with my Peltors-
1 set is 16 years old, my wife liked them so much I had to get her a set they amplify sound below 85db ( range commands and conversation ) and shut off noise above that threshold You can also purchase new padding for them ( a health kit ? ) They are comfortable enough that I have found myself still wearing them on a cold range changing targets, I forgot I was wearing them |
July 30, 2016, 09:29 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2016
Posts: 101
|
I out thought myself w/ the pair I have. It has separate battery and volume control on each muff. Figured if one ear lost volume, I'd still have the other side. I think I would prefer one volume control w/ two batterys in parallel. The volume control on mine turn in opposite directions. Not a big deal, just a reminder when I use them to balance them out. I tried one ear and save the other side, works, but just another reminder to me. They have become like my old truck. I wished it would just quit so I can rationalize another truck, but it keeps running after 21 years.
|
|
|