The Firing Line Forums A Physics Lesson
 Forum Rules Firearms Safety Firearms Photos Links Library Lost Password Email Changes
 Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 24, 2017, 11:07 PM #1 '88Scrat Senior Member   Join Date: July 11, 2011 Location: Kansas Posts: 322 A Physics Lesson Ok I need someone to explain something to me. This could be perceived as a dumb question... Why when I take my SMLE No.4 MK1 and shoot with the 300 yard battle sight zero at 50 yards am I hitting a foot or more ABOVE the target? In my head I imagine this as two lines intersecting at a 45° angle at 300 yards (yeah I know thats an exaggerated example) with the top line representing the sight picture and the bottom line representing the travel of the bullet. Move the target forward and the top line, representing the sight picture, doesn't change but the point of impact should now be in the dirt right? I know bullets fly in a parabolic arc but could it really be that pronounced? Man, not knowing this makes me feel kinda stupid... __________________ BOOM
 October 24, 2017, 11:28 PM #2 tangolima Senior Member   Join Date: September 28, 2013 Posts: 1,841 You are sure the battle sight has really been zeroed at 300 yards? And the ammo you were shooting, was it milsurp or close to the military load? -TL Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
October 25, 2017, 02:22 AM   #4
JohnKSa
Staff

Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 21,028
It should be hitting high, but a foot at 50 yards seems too high. Are you sure it's actually zeroed at 300?
Quote:
 In my head I imagine this as two lines intersecting at a 45° angle at 300 yards (yeah I know thats an exaggerated example) with the top line representing the sight picture and the bottom line representing the travel of the bullet.
The sight line will be a straight line from your eye, through the sights to the target.

Because the bullet is going to be pulled down by gravity as soon as it leaves the bore, the sights are set to angle the barrel upwards slightly with respect to the sight line. That will lob the bullet upwards, above the sight line, on an arc that will allow gravity to bring it back down so that it coincides with the sightline at the zero distance.

So the bullet is going to start out a little below the sight line (since the bore is below the sights), rise above the sightline (probably somewhere around 25 yards from the muzzle) and keep arcing upwards until the point where it reaches the peak and starts to descend.

The peak of the trajectory will be more than halfway to the zero point. In a vacuum, the high point of the trajectory would be exactly halfway to the zero point--the trajectory would be a perfect parabola. But because of air resistance, the bullet is slowing as it goes downrange and the parabola gets skewed. The bullet has to be fired so that it will reach the high point after the halfway point to make everything work.

Anyway, after the trajectory peaks, from that point on, the bullet will be falling. It will fall until it comes back down to the sight line at the distance for which the sights have been zeroed. It will keep falling, faster and faster the farther it goes downrange since the acceleration of gravity is constant and constant acceleration means constantly increasing speed.

This website has a good picture showing the relationship of the sights and the bore.
http://www.mainviewtech.com/en/branded.php?pid=193
__________________
Did you know that there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?

 October 25, 2017, 01:22 PM #5 '88Scrat Senior Member   Join Date: July 11, 2011 Location: Kansas Posts: 322 So it is the arc of the bullet I wasn't taking into consideration... As far as the sights on my rifle, they are the standard battle sights found on the SMLE No.4 MK 1 and everything I have read says the BSZ should be 300. __________________ BOOM
 October 25, 2017, 02:58 PM #6 T. O'Heir Senior Member   Join Date: February 13, 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 8,542 A No.4 MK1 Lee-Enfield is not an SMLE. Only a No. 1 MK III is an SMLE. "...perceived as a dumb question..." No such thing. "...the 300 yard battle sight..." Is about Mk VIII ammo with its 174 grain bullet at 2440 FPS. Pretty much, only. It also has to do with the height of the front sight blade and where you're holding on the target. Anyway, at 50 yards the bullet is still rising on its trajectory arc. Read this. https://www.milsurps.com/enfield.php?pg=ti15.htm __________________ Spelling and grammar count!
 October 25, 2017, 03:49 PM #7 Jim Watson Senior Member   Join Date: October 25, 2001 Location: Alabama Posts: 14,215 Tim Mullin wrote that there are untold thousands of people born to soldiers whose enemies could not hit them at 50 yards with rifles that would not zero closer than 300. Applying mostly to the generation whose Fathers fought in WWI.
 October 25, 2017, 05:03 PM #8 mehavey Senior Member   Join Date: June 17, 2010 Location: Virginia Posts: 4,762
 October 25, 2017, 05:18 PM #9 JohnKSa Staff   Join Date: February 12, 2001 Location: DFW Area Posts: 21,028 .303 ballistics aren't as good as the .30-06, but the graph is still instructive. I can see being a foot high (maybe even a little more) for the .303 at midrange. But being a foot high at 50 yards seems wrong. I would expect something more like 6-7" high at 50 yards. __________________ Did you know that there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?
October 25, 2017, 09:30 PM   #10
jimbob86
Senior Member

Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,151
Quote:
 .303 ballistics aren't as good as the .30-06,

What bullet is that in the chart? Lyman Lead Somthin' What Gas Check? If it is this bullet-

http://www.westernbullet.com/ly3gr1.html

Looks to be as aerodymanic as a greyhound bus with all the windows open.....

...... I'd imagine a 174gr .303" spitzer or spitzer boat tail would be flatter, even if only pushed to 2540 ft/ sec....... that was the WWII loadings (Mk VII and Mk VIII).

Somebody with a ballistics calculator run the numbers, please......
__________________
TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T."

http://nefirearm.com/

Last edited by jimbob86; October 25, 2017 at 09:52 PM.

 October 25, 2017, 09:39 PM #11 mehavey Senior Member   Join Date: June 17, 2010 Location: Virginia Posts: 4,762 Actually, when I went back and re-did the calcs for the standard Mark-VII loading (above), the 303 very closely approached the 175 SMK 7.62 NATO sniper/match round... about ±8" all the way out to 350. Really doggone good in fact. That post somehow "disappeared"
 October 25, 2017, 10:02 PM #12 jimbob86 Senior Member   Join Date: October 4, 2007 Location: All the way to NEBRASKA Posts: 8,151 Mehavey, the closest Lyman bullet I could find with a listed BC was LYM LFN GC 311441 .... sounds close ..... BC listed was .143 ..... no wonder the graph seemed so steep (that and I am used to figuring flight paths for .270WIN ..... __________________ TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T." http://nefirearm.com/
 October 25, 2017, 10:13 PM #13 mehavey Senior Member   Join Date: June 17, 2010 Location: Virginia Posts: 4,762 so it was... (see lower left corner of chart) (it has a nose only Victor McLaglen could love)
 October 25, 2017, 10:20 PM #14 jimbob86 Senior Member   Join Date: October 4, 2007 Location: All the way to NEBRASKA Posts: 8,151 LFN was Lead Flat Nose ..... LBN? Lead Blunt Nose? __________________ TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T." http://nefirearm.com/
 October 25, 2017, 10:26 PM #15 mehavey Senior Member   Join Date: June 17, 2010 Location: Virginia Posts: 4,762
 October 25, 2017, 10:55 PM #16 Jim Watson Senior Member   Join Date: October 25, 2001 Location: Alabama Posts: 14,215 We don't know that the OP's 300 yard sight setting is actually on target at 300, do we?
October 25, 2017, 11:06 PM   #17
JohnKSa
Staff

Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 21,028
Quote:
 What bullet is that in the chart? Lyman Lead Somthin' What Gas Check?
Yup, I should have paid more attention. You never know when someone's going to post a trajectory for a gas-checked lead bullet in a thread about the .303.

At any rate, that makes a foot high at 50 yards even more improbable. Sounds like the sights aren't really zeroed for 300.
__________________
Did you know that there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?

 October 26, 2017, 12:02 AM #18 mehavey Senior Member   Join Date: June 17, 2010 Location: Virginia Posts: 4,762 Heck, I'm running GCs in my own 303, 30-40, 308, 30-06, 375H&H ... aaaaaand at numbers starting with "2".... (hence the leftover bullet in QuickTarget) Looked quite normal in passing glance.
 October 26, 2017, 07:21 AM #19 '88Scrat Senior Member   Join Date: July 11, 2011 Location: Kansas Posts: 322 I'll take another look at the sights. There don't appear to be any obvious modifications to them. Anything in particular I should look for? __________________ BOOM
 October 26, 2017, 08:40 AM #20 jimbob86 Senior Member   Join Date: October 4, 2007 Location: All the way to NEBRASKA Posts: 8,151 If the rear sight looks unmodified/ undamaged ....check the front sight. __________________ TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T." http://nefirearm.com/
 October 26, 2017, 02:19 PM #21 TRX Senior Member   Join Date: September 24, 2008 Posts: 265 Unless you know *which* .303 British ammunition your sight graduations are for, you're out of luck. Over the years the Brits changed the bullet weight and velocity of the .303 several times. The trajectories varied quite a bit. As for SAAMI or CIP spec hunting ammo... who knows.
 November 17, 2017, 11:23 PM #22 James K Staff   Join Date: March 17, 1999 Posts: 24,193 It should be recognized that for long range shooting the bullet will cross the line of sight twice, once on the way up and again on the way down. At the latter point, if the rifle is sighted in properly, the bullet may impact the target and stop or continue past/through the target. This is taken advantage of in military training where it allows rifles to be sighted in at short range and retain the same sight setting at hundreds of yards. Jim __________________ Jim K

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Hogan's Alley     Tactics and Training     Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum     Handguns: The Revolver Forum     Handguns: General Handgun Forum The Hide     The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action     The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics     The Art of the Rifle: General     The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum     NFA Guns and Gear     The Hunt The North Corral     Lock and Load: Live Fire Exercises     Competition Shooting     Curios and Relics     Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting The Skunkworks     Gear and Accessories     The Smithy     Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting         Bullet Casting     The Harley Nolden Memorial Institute for Firearms Research The Conference Center     General Discussion Forum         TFL Photo Contest     Law and Civil Rights         Legal and Political The Firing Line Gun Show     Retail Deals and Feedback Forum Support     Site Questions and Tech Support (NO FIREARMS QUESTIONS)     Software and Function Testing

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 AM.

 -- vBulletin 3 ---- vBulletin 3 - variable fonts ---- Low profile (unsupported) Forum Home Page - Archive - Top