|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 10, 2017, 07:50 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Posts: 1,581
|
Is There Any Validity To The Claim That An Altered Defensive Weapon Can Cause Legal Problems?
It seems that anytime someone mentions doing a little custom work to a carry gun, someone else chimes in to issue caution stating that any alteration to a carry gun can cause legal issues if used in a defensive situation. My question is this....Has there been any cases that can be cited with specific examples of someone actually facing jail time or forced to pay in a civil suit for using a carry gun in a defensive situation that has had custom work done to it?
After shooting my Glocks today I can say I would like to put some Ghost trigger parts in them to help them out a bit, but am a bit leery if there is any truth to this.
__________________
Stay Groovy |
August 10, 2017, 08:01 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
There have been three threads on this topic within the last 13 months: One; Two; and Three.
This topic has been well covered, and I can't imagine that there's anything to add.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
|