|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 21, 2017, 07:03 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,887
|
Had my first squib load today
I've had this idea of a .32 round ball load and I made some loads last month and shot them today. THe first three left the barrel and they had less recoil than a .22 Short, but the fourth one...
It went about 2 inches down the bore and got stuck. I don't know what grain charge I was using, but I know I was using Bullseye powder. I think going forward I'm going to use either black powder and load the case to nearly full or Trail Boss and load the case about half full. The fast Bullseye power didn't do me much good today. All my other .32 reloads shot fine.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
September 21, 2017, 07:52 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,965
|
I'd bet if you upped the charge of Bullseye some they would shoot fine.
I mostly use Red Dot for round balls and for fire lapping with low velocity rounds in rifles (cast lead bullets only). |
September 22, 2017, 12:48 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
|
There's a great U-Tube video on how to clear a bullet stuck in the bore. I think the guy is OKhick45 or something like that. The fellow that told me about it used it to clear his rifle...
I agree, you need more powder. I used to make loads like that for my .30-30 and 06 but I used 5 grains of Red Dot... Tony |
September 22, 2017, 06:28 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
|
.32" round ball fired in what cartridge?
For .30 Cal guns, I use a .310" ball... I use Red Dot for my round ball loads...As it is not a published load, I am unwilling to state what my smallest charge in .30-30 is, but suffice it to say it is really, really small... I have never stuck a ball in my 26" Marlin 1893... With a peep sight, I can keep my shots on a 9" skillet all day at 60 yards... |
September 22, 2017, 07:14 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 14, 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,918
|
Good thing you caught it before firing the next round. Were you just guessing on the amount of powder to use or did you use load data?
__________________
We know exactly where one cow with Mad-cow-disease is located, among the millions and millions of cows in America, but we haven't got a clue where thousands of illegal immigrants and terrorists are |
September 22, 2017, 07:48 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
Quote:
I love that guys YouTube channel
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek |
|
September 22, 2017, 09:54 AM | #7 | |
Junior member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Posts: 508
|
Quote:
|
|
September 22, 2017, 01:26 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
|
Quote:
FWIW I have a good "gallery load" for my .44 Magnum; a 123 gr. ball over 3.5 gr. Bullseye...
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast! I've learned how to stand on my own two knees... |
|
September 22, 2017, 02:49 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 22, 2017
Posts: 1,011
|
Quote:
Second, the description sounds like the case had no powder at all and the force of the primer launched the projectile out of the case and into the barrel. |
|
September 22, 2017, 02:52 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
Bullseye will work, but Trail Boss will probably be better. Why would you load the trail boss load half full? I thought Trail Boss was always loaded at 75% capacity or more.
Did you load the Bullseye rounds? How can you not know the load? |
September 22, 2017, 03:17 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,887
|
Quote:
Of note, I seated the ball in the case halfway and crimped it just past the hemisphere and I made a few other loads where I pushed the ball deeper into the case down to where no part of the ball was sticking out past the case mouth. I didn't get to shoot any of the deeper set ball loads, squib load came from the loads where the ball was crimped just past the hemisphere. Again, I can't remember how much powder was in the squid load as I made some 1.0 and 2.0 grain loads. I'm figuring in the future, if I decide to bother with round ball loads again, I"ll use 3 grains of Bullseye or more or just put a generous amount of Trail Boss in it. And the only reason I knew there was a squib was because I thought that was my last shot and I took the cylinder out to check the bore for leading. The sound between a shot that left the bore and one that didn't were identical.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
|
September 22, 2017, 03:20 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,887
|
If 75% is standard, I don't have a problem loading it to that capacity.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
September 22, 2017, 05:21 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
1 grain of bullseye would be real light even in plain old 32 S&W. I believe 1.3 or 1.5 grains of BE would be used behind a 85 grain bullet.
|
September 22, 2017, 11:51 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,876
|
You might want to consider keeping better track of what your loads are while you're at the range , here's something to consider .
Sorry about that first picture size . That was the first time I ever did it from my phone and could not size it down . I got home and checked the thread on my computer . Only to find out the picture was so big I had to run to the other side of the house to view it all Quote:
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . Last edited by Metal god; September 23, 2017 at 01:55 AM. |
|
September 23, 2017, 01:34 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
|
Quote:
In my case the bullet (fmj 158 grain) didn't exit the barrel and all the gases behind it seemed to come out of the barrel/cylinder gap. The result was quite noticeable at the indoor range where I was shooting. No damage to the revolver or me (except for my pride) but the sound was definitely odd and like I said the cloud of gun smoke enveloping me was a clear indication something had gone wrong. I'm guessing your loads were so light you didn't get the tell tale cloud. |
|
September 23, 2017, 03:34 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
As I mentioned in your previous thread on the subject...
I've been down this road before. If you want super-light loads with a round ball, use a rifle primer, ONLY. Light charges of powder, with the small bearing surface and low friction of a round ball result in very poor powder burn. The powder is effectively acting as a 'buffer' and absorbing the impulse of the primer, without igniting much. A rifle primer, alone, was better than a very light powder charge in my testing (3" and 5.5" barrels with all of the .32 cases short of .327 Federal). I haven't tried TB in the 'pop gun' loads, from what I can remember. But I don't think it would be much better. Either ignore conventional wisdom and go powderless, or bump the powder charge closer to 3 gr.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
September 24, 2017, 01:09 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,887
|
Quote:
Which is something I'm not fond of. I think after I blow through the pound of BE I have, I'm running to Titegroup.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
|
September 24, 2017, 01:11 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,887
|
Quote:
And for the record, I'm looking at using this ball load more in a rifle and not a revolver. So, the extra 12 to 16 inches of barrel in mind, should I use even more powder than 3 grains?
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
|
September 25, 2017, 05:02 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,887
|
I went back to the range today and brought my H&R top break .32 S&W Long with me. I decided I'd shoot through the rest of my round ball handloads until I got another squib and... I didn't get another squib.
I noticed though that the reloads I made where I crimped just past the equator of the ball didn't feel as powerful and they were sooty, so they didn't seal against the chambers. But the loads where I pushed the ball deep into the case, to where no part of the ball was past the case mouth, they felt stronger and didn't soot up the cases as much. They mostly hit about 2 inches low at 7 yards. So, going forward, I think I'm going to use 3 grains of Bullseye, seat the ball fully in the case, and use them as my go to plinking load in my top break. The extra powder should help seal the chamber and up velocity and bring the POI closer to POA. They were a lot of fun to shoot today too.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
September 25, 2017, 11:27 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
|
If you're casting your own. Take a look at the Lee mold for .32 caliber revolvers. I cast those for use in my .300 blackout and squirrel loads for my hunting rifles.
Sometime back in the American Rifleman there was a wilderness survival article and one of the things they talked about was low powered cast bullet loads for small game. The idea was if you got lost and needed to shoot small game, you'd have a load that wouldn't destroy it... Tony |
September 26, 2017, 09:42 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,887
|
This is the first I'm hearing about articles in magazines talking about a low power small game load for survival and I tell you what, that's exactly the reason I got into the .32 caliber handguns and soon the .327 Henry Big Boy.
I find .22 LR guns to be too picky with ammo while even with the .32 top break H&R that has horrible sights and a heavy trigger and a pitted bore, it was outshooting my .22 pistol at the range yesterday. The .32 and .327 has all but killed any interest I have in .22 LR. I can load .327 guns with .32 Long as light as .22 for small game and load the .327 to max and it's nearly as powerful as .357, has little less recoil, and flatter trajectory.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
October 18, 2017, 09:55 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Gwinnett County Georgia
Posts: 1,136
|
I recently bought a Kel-Tec P32, I am thinking about getting some dies for .32acp. Where can you buy brass for .32acp
__________________
Do not follow where the path may lead, go, instead where there is no path and leave a trail - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
October 18, 2017, 10:19 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
|
Quote:
F. Guffey |
|
October 18, 2017, 12:08 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2016
Location: NE Atlanta
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
|
|
October 19, 2017, 10:33 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
At least your squib was from tinkering with a unique load. All THREE of mine were from no powder. Projectile didn't exit the chamber far enough to load another round and I had NO blast or smoke. I literally heard nothing but "click." I have instituted a number of QC checks in my reloading process.
|
|
|