|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 21, 2012, 05:18 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 627
|
gun shop employee shoots customer in the back
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/21...est=latestnews
I wasn't sure whether to put this one in law&civil rights or not. Clearly this is a negligent discharge in my opinion even though the article lists it as an accidental discharge. Either way, I am usually one to hope someone can avoid prosecution or arrest when accidents occur, but I was wondering how fellow TFL members felt about this instance? Should this gun store employee face charges. I don't think he should face severe, drastic charges here. I just feel in this instance he should maybe at least receive some kind of citation or misdemeanor summons. I was hoping for some more thoughts on the issue from fellow members.
__________________
NRA Distinguished Life Member "Abraham Lincoln freed all men, but Sam Colt made them all equal." (post Civil War slogan) |
November 21, 2012, 05:48 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 4, 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 149
|
I would think they would charge him something like they would charge a reckless driver who injured a person.
__________________
Guns don't kill people, fathers with pretty daughters do. Two wrongs don't make a right, but three comes pretty close. Proud NRA member |
November 21, 2012, 07:26 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
could go either way
Yeah RobertInIowa, it will be interesting to see how this one plays out.
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
November 21, 2012, 07:35 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2012
Location: Richmond, Va.
Posts: 353
|
This may hinge on whether it was his firearm, or if he was unloading one brought in by a customer for repair, trade, or whatever. Even then, it should have been pointed elsewhere. For all we know, it could have been a riccochet.
__________________
Frank-- Member, GoA, NRA-ILA, SAF, NRA Life Member |
November 21, 2012, 07:37 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: February 12, 2011
Posts: 67
|
Accident?
Let's see now. Handling a loaded weapon in the store, muzzle not pointed in a safe direction, finger on the trigger? Evidently didn't know what he was doing and proceeded anyway. Accident waiting to happen maybe but definitely not an accident. Negligent discharge and endangering the public in my opinion. Not to mention stupid! He needs to be fined, put on probation and find another line of work.
|
November 21, 2012, 07:51 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
throttleup
Quote:
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
|
November 21, 2012, 08:02 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2002
Location: Nunya
Posts: 113
|
Shot in the back at the age of 65 with a .45. That can't be good. I hope his prospects for full recovery are good though.
__________________
I know who I am. I'm the dude playing the dude disguised as another dude. |
November 21, 2012, 08:20 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,731
|
Way too many variables left out of the news report to render any kind of valid opinion.
-what operation was the employee performing? -what kind of firearm? -where was the victim? -was the employee alone? That's a good start. |
November 21, 2012, 08:53 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 164
|
No variables required...fact: employee handling loaded firearm...fact: firearm is discharged = negligence...fact: innocent bystander is harmed = responsibility.
No pass...he has to take responsibility.
__________________
IDPA Member A00640 Founding Charter Member - Middle Tennessee Shooter's Club |
November 21, 2012, 12:38 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I've been at my LGS when customers have brought in intended "trade-in" weapons that turned out to be loaded.
Should the employees treat all weapons as loaded? Yes. Would such a case be a potentially mitigating factor? Yes, at least in my opinion. What the employee was doing at the time should definitely be a factor for criminal charges, but may not be as much of a factor for civil suits, again in my opinion. |
November 21, 2012, 12:53 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
that is a good point
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
November 21, 2012, 01:43 PM | #12 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Yes, the employee should be charged with a crime. Yes, he should be open to a civil suit. I don't care if he's "one of ours" or not; his negligence caused grievous harm to another person. Had I been the victim, I'd be pursuing both options, same as I would if the employee hit me with his car or injured me with an errant power tool.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
November 21, 2012, 02:57 PM | #13 |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
Why was the gun loaded to begin with and why was he pointing it towards the customer and the street. That man is toast.
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- |
November 21, 2012, 03:05 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 4, 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 149
|
Well, the employee is "supposed to be" a professional. Anyone going into that store has a right to expect them to at least know how NOT to shoot the customers. Besides all the other reasons, it has to be bad for business when someone is air lifted from your store. Hopefully the customer comes out of this as good as posssible.
__________________
Guns don't kill people, fathers with pretty daughters do. Two wrongs don't make a right, but three comes pretty close. Proud NRA member |
November 21, 2012, 03:12 PM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
Broke one or more of the four rules. Could have been avoided. Civil liability six figures plus.
|
November 21, 2012, 05:11 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
|
I suppose that is one way to keep the customer from leaving without a sale.
So many things wrong with that situation. I consider it complete negligence
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question. What is stupid is not asking it. |
November 21, 2012, 05:13 PM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 5, 2012
Posts: 89
|
Looks like the store is going to have a new owner.
|
November 21, 2012, 05:15 PM | #18 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
RULE I: ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED RULE II: NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO DESTROY Rule III: KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR SIGHTS ARE ON THE TARGET AND YOU ARE READY TO FIRE RULE IV: BE SURE OF YOUR TARGET AND WHAT LIES BEYOND IT Check. IMHO he got 'em all. |
|
November 21, 2012, 05:18 PM | #19 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
Seemingly, yes all four
|
November 21, 2012, 05:22 PM | #20 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
November 21, 2012, 05:47 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
Criminal charges or not, I'd be willing to bet there will be a new minority owner at Copper County Sporting Arms after the civil trials over.
Any takers?
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
November 21, 2012, 10:44 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2007
Posts: 165
|
Get a lawyer. Sue them for everything. Enjoy a workfree life afterwards.
|
November 21, 2012, 11:23 PM | #23 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
Quote:
|
|
November 22, 2012, 12:12 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2011
Posts: 990
|
Didn't read posts (on mobile device)
Anyone think the gun shop may be held liable for not training employees and having safe weapons handling practices in place. Premises liability.... |
November 22, 2012, 04:44 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,805
|
Some people don't understand the definition of negligence. To meet legal requirements for negligence the store employee had to be doing something that he knew was dangerous, or should have known would be dangerous and did not take precautions. The fact that he was trying to unload the gun is evidence that he was taking precautions to prevent an accident.
Does not say how the accident happened, but there are enough facts present to probably rule out negligence. Had the person handling the gun been under the influence of drugs or alcohol, had he been dry firing the gun without checking the chamber, had he given the gun to a 9 year old kid to unload, had he knowingly pointed what he thought was an unloaded gun at someone it would be negligence. To have a gun fire unintentionally while trying to make it safe is simply an accident. There is almost never a criminal charge in an accident, but that does not mean the person who causes one is not responsible in a civil trial, and there probably will be one here. Too many on the internet gun forums throw the negligence word around much too freely. |
Tags |
accidental discharge , gun shops , gun stores , negligent discharge , shooting |
|
|