The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 19, 2009, 01:20 AM   #1
glockopop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 922
Pinned flash hider--status while building?

I've seen uppers, barrels, and rifles before that are 14.5" with a pinned 1.5" flash hider that are considered 16" barrels because the flash hider is permanently attached for a total length of 16". My question is, if I were to do this myself, would the gun technically be illegal after it's been cut but before the flash hider's been pinned? If so, would I have to send it somewhere and get that done?
__________________
I've only got two hands, but I've been known to carry three Glocks.
RZA
glockopop is offline  
Old November 19, 2009, 11:08 AM   #2
Willie Lowman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 3,006
If the barrel is not on the rifle, it is just a barrel.

However possessing a short barrel and a gun that it could go on with no NFA paperwork is constructive possession (illegal).

While I think you could do what you are talking about legally, it seems you are treading on dangerous ground.

I would just buy a upper that has the 14.5" barrel and hider pinned on and sell the old 16" upper you are looking to cut.
__________________
"9mm has a very long history of being a pointy little bullet moving quickly" --Sevens
Willie Lowman is offline  
Old November 19, 2009, 01:00 PM   #3
espnazi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Posts: 256
Wait isn't the legal length 18 inches?
espnazi is offline  
Old November 19, 2009, 01:10 PM   #4
robfromga
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2009
Location: Augusta, Ga
Posts: 240
^^^

Not on a rifle, 16"
robfromga is offline  
Old November 22, 2009, 07:32 AM   #5
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,274
If you do it yourself1)realize "blind pin" has a whole other definition to the BATF than it does to a machinist. found that out by calling the BATF office of firearms technology.

After you lock it on with a blind pin,you must weld over the end of the pin,then dress it off so the weld can't be seen,to prevent "drilling it out"

I'm not suggesting it makes sense,I'm just reporting.

Don't forget to stack all the parts on the barrel,like the gas block/sight,or anything else that won't go over the muzzle device.

Just me,but I cannot comprehend the advantage of a 14 in bbl if you have to stick a pickle on it and make it 16
HiBC is offline  
Old November 27, 2009, 04:01 PM   #6
Chipperman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2000
Location: Live Free or Die, Baby!
Posts: 1,550
Quote:
Wait isn't the legal length 18 inches?
That's for Shotgun
Chipperman is offline  
Old November 27, 2009, 08:08 PM   #7
LukeA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2009
Posts: 542
Quote:
Wait isn't the legal length 18 inches?
It used to be (for rifles), but then the powers that be decided a few million M1 carbines with 16 in. barrels were worth more to the government as cash after being sold to the public, and that that would be much easier if they weren't NFA items, so they changed the law.
LukeA is offline  
Old November 28, 2009, 09:20 AM   #8
RAnb
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2008
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 447
Quote:
However possessing a short barrel and a gun that it could go on with no NFA paperwork is constructive possession (illegal).
Not always. I have never read about anyone being convicted for merely owning Thompson Center pistol and rifle barrels without a registered SBR.

Ranb
RAnb is offline  
Old November 28, 2009, 03:03 PM   #9
Willie Lowman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 3,006
If you own a Thompson/Center rifle and have some pistol barrels but no pistol you are guilty of this thought crime.

I don't think they have gone after anyone with a T/C on this issue but that doesn't change the fact that people have been arrested for having a stock or vertical grip that could go on a SP 89 or AR15 pistol.

The feds are not kicking in doors to measure barrels. However, every once in a while someone gets popped for this BS

It is a retarded law. I am not going to argue about it in this tread.
Willie Lowman is offline  
Old November 28, 2009, 05:15 PM   #10
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,967
"It used to be (for rifles), but then the powers that be decided a few million M1 carbines with 16 in. barrels were worth more to the government as cash after being sold to the public, and that that would be much easier if they weren't NFA items, so they changed the law."

I have heard this for 35 years, but I have never seen GI carbine with less than a 16" barrel. LukeA, can you shed any light?
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old November 28, 2009, 07:38 PM   #11
LukeA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2009
Posts: 542
The way I understand it is that the NFA originally had jurisdiction over both rifle and shotgun barrels of less than 18 inches. M1 carbines have 16 in barrels, and would have been NFA items, and as such would have been very difficult to sell as surplus, so the NFA was amended so M1 carbines were removed from NFA jurisdiction. I don't really know more than that, and I can't easily verify it either.
LukeA is offline  
Old December 7, 2009, 02:27 PM   #12
Technosavant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 4,040
Quote:
Just me,but I cannot comprehend the advantage of a 14 in bbl if you have to stick a pickle on it and make it 16
Because usually a 16" bbl isn't naked- there's a flash suppressor or compensator on there anyway, so overall length is closer to 17-18". With a 14.5" bbl and a pinned muzzle device, it takes the overall length down an inch and a half, giving slightly better maneuverability in short quarters. On the AR-15 it also eases things for the carbine length gas system, as the 16" bbl and the short gas system tends to result in rather strong ejection.
Technosavant is offline  
Old December 7, 2009, 02:57 PM   #13
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
I'm just currious - other than "looks", is there any real reason to have a 14" barrel over a 16" barrel?
Skans is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06714 seconds with 10 queries