|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 11, 2020, 12:54 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
Quote:
Is a double barrel shotgun with two triggers that can be pulled at the same time a machinegun?
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! Last edited by Cheapshooter; January 11, 2020 at 01:03 PM. |
|
January 11, 2020, 01:37 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 2, 2018
Posts: 252
|
Shooting Illustrated reported, "the ATF does make an exception for "volley guns" and allows the manufacture and sale of firearms that fire more than one round with each pull of the trigger, provided that those rounds are fired from separate barrels."
It's not altogether different than a double-barrel shotgun or a derringer that fires both barrels. There are other volley guns like the nock-gun, duckfoot pistol, and organ guns, although most of those have only been produced prior to cartridges. |
January 11, 2020, 02:08 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2013
Posts: 112
|
Did this forum crash there're website?? The link is not responding.
|
January 11, 2020, 04:17 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 2019
Posts: 819
|
It's still working for me.
__________________
Conspiracy theorists are the greatest political spin-doctors of all time. Only they can make the absolute worst political blunders sound like spectacular feats of ingenuity. |
January 11, 2020, 08:26 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,883
|
It's a gun made for very close range self defense, nearly point blank ranges. It's not meant to be a target gun, it's not meant to be a plinking gun, it's not meant to be collectible or pretty or something you can't wait to show everyone at the range and feel superior because you own it, it's a gun that has the dirty job of putting bullets into somebody who is a threat to your life or liberty.
When using proper .22 Mag ammo meant for handguns, it is regarded as being as sufficient for self defnese as .38 is, but with less recoil. My issue with .22 Mag has been the consistent inconsistency of the ammunition to not have a failure to fire for one range session. Actually, now that I remember it, the first time I ever shot .22 Mag I had a FTF on the very first round. Talk about foreshadowing... This Standard Manufacturing revolver is unique in the 2 shots per trigger pull and what I like about that is if there were to come a time where it had to be used defensively, even if one of the rounds didn't go off, the other one would with a near 100% probability. To me that makes up for the .22 Mag's lack of reliability. The fact is that this gun is meant for people who are not experienced with guns and solely want something for protection. Something with low recoil, cheap ammo, and not full of safeties is a good choice. If you don't want one, don't get one, but don't project your opinions onto others telling them what is a good idea or a bad idea for them. It's this exact type of gun snobbery that gets all of us painted as a bunch of gun toting buttholes.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
January 11, 2020, 09:52 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
Quote:
Regardless what anybody thinks of the Thunderstruck it is good to see people finding loopholes in the unconstitutional restrictions put on firearms by government bureaucrats!
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! |
|
January 11, 2020, 10:21 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
23 lbs, we all probably know a few people who probably couldn't generate that much force to the trigger while remaining on-target.
I'm with the no-trigger guard / not interested crowd. My guess is this will be the subject in several years when one of these is dropped and fires incidentally with serious injury / death as a result as there was no guard.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
January 11, 2020, 11:48 PM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
Quote:
That 23 Lb trigger along with a blade style trigger safety is what makes the Thunderstruck both cary, and drop safe. If, and it's a big if, the gun would be dropped muzzle first, on some type of thin structure or object, that could possibly activate the trigger blade, it's still extremely unlikely the weight of the gun could exert enough force to fully depress the double trigger, and keep the safety blade depressed enough to fire. Using a free fall energy calculator a 1 1/2 lb object dropped from 5 feet creates 7.5 ft lb of energy. Or in other words less than half the force needed to fully depress the trigger while it lands perfectly on the trigger safety blade, and maintains that perfect alignment long enough for full trigger travel. Just can't happen!
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! Last edited by Cheapshooter; January 12, 2020 at 12:20 AM. |
|
January 12, 2020, 01:12 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 2, 2018
Posts: 252
|
The 23 pound trigger is twice as heavy as a double-action trigger that most people would regard as "heavy." Most people, if considering an 11-pound double-action trigger, are led to believe it will materially interfere with their ability to place shots on target and that they are better off with a 5 or 6 pound striker-action trigger which in their experience, "they shoot better."
A 23-pound trigger quite likely would be a strong deterrent against unintentional discharges. Since the rest of the "Thunderstruck" is rather "polarizing," perhaps more practically it calls to question whether a 5 or 6 pound trigger is really important for a defensive, personal-protection firearm. Maybe 11 pounds is a good thing, even if it doesn't flatter us with tight little groups on the bullseye. |
January 12, 2020, 04:13 AM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Location: Pensacola, Fl
Posts: 3,092
|
No trigger guard? Not interested. Basically, the only really viable role for it is as a snake gun. And then there is the 23 lb trigger pull. Nope. A cheapo .38 snub with snake shot is a better platform for snakes, and then you have 5 shots vs 4.
__________________
COME AND TAKE IT http://www.tamu.edu/ccbn/dewitt/batgon.htm Formerly lived in Ga, but now I'm back in Tx! Aaaand, now I'm off to Fla... |
January 12, 2020, 06:04 AM | #36 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
I kept thinking that it's got one trigger with a dingus in the middle, rather than 2 triggers. I guess not?
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
January 12, 2020, 06:06 AM | #37 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
January 12, 2020, 02:22 PM | #38 | |||
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
IF this is the case, then then gun only has one trigger (connected to the rest of the firing mechanism, and separate barrels puts in the ATF's "volley fire" exception group. If this is not the case, and that little "second trigger" can actually fire the gun, no matter how difficult it is to operate, then the gun has 2 triggers, and does not fall under the "more than one shot from a single trigger" rule. I applaud the ingenuity of the concept, but I don't care for the execution of the design.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|||
|
|