March 4, 2013, 02:27 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2012
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,217
|
MIM/Cast Part
I bought a Kimber and many mentioned all of the MIM parts and how horrible it is. Recently I ordered a new slide lock from Wilson. Guess how its made? If you said MIM you would be on the money. It does say on the package that it is from bar stock. So im sending it back, I feel rather cheated. Anyone else notice the same? Could also be cast, no diference in quality.
Parting line a little tough to see.
__________________
Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it. Milton Freidman "If you find yourself in a fair fight,,, Your tactics suck"- Unknown Last edited by BoogieMan; March 4, 2013 at 02:32 PM. |
March 4, 2013, 02:41 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 3,656
|
Thats no good!
__________________
E-Shock rounds are engineered to expend maximum energy into soft targets, turning the density mass into an expanding rotational cone of NyTrilium matrix particles, causing neurological collapse to the central nervous system.- Yeah I can do that. I guarantee you will know it if a bicyclist hits your house going 1000 mph. -Smaug |
March 4, 2013, 02:50 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Just to make sure I'm not missing something:
"Bar stock" and "cast/MIM" are mutually-exclusive, aren't they? So either WC put the wrong slide stop in the package, or they're fibbing on their packaging? |
March 4, 2013, 03:22 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Minden , Nebraska
Posts: 1,407
|
I think at one time that Wilson offered two grades of parts. the high grade was barstock and the lower grade was MIM. I don't know if tis is still the case. I have never had a problem with MIM parts so I don't worry about it. if you want to hear about the barstock part problems that I had in a colt that is another story
|
March 4, 2013, 03:40 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2012
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,217
|
This is the lower grade Wilson part. I dont think it will fail because of its construction, I also dont think that other MIM/Cast parts will fail because of there construction. I guess the main point is that the label is misleading. And what is arguably one of the top 5 manufacturers *(Wilson) uses the same parts as one (Kimber) who takes an extreme amount of flak here.
__________________
Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it. Milton Freidman "If you find yourself in a fair fight,,, Your tactics suck"- Unknown |
March 4, 2013, 04:35 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
You'd like to think that they just put the wrong part in the bag, and they'll be happy to give you the correct part in exchange.
|
March 5, 2013, 01:44 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Deerfield,New Hampshire
Posts: 512
|
Are there any documented failures with MIM parts?
|
March 5, 2013, 02:01 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
If I told you I'd had a failure, what sort of "documentation" would you want?
|
March 5, 2013, 02:15 PM | #9 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
|
Quote:
I'm bettin' there are thousands of documented cases of MIM parts failures.....just as there are thousands of documented cases of non-MIM part failures. Parts fail, that's why they make "replacement parts". After years of folks whinnin' about MIM parts there never has been any evidence that they have any higher or lower failure rate than non-MIM parts.......still folks whine. Quote:
|
||
March 5, 2013, 02:34 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2012
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,217
|
I should clarify. The only reason im sending it back is because its no diferent than the OEM Kimber lock. I dont really care either way if its MIM or not except I paid for a billet part. I was kind of curious how they made a slide lock billet/bar unless it was fabricated. The Kimber lock had become a bit rough on the edge that the plunger rides on. China stone, 5 mins and its good.
__________________
Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it. Milton Freidman "If you find yourself in a fair fight,,, Your tactics suck"- Unknown |
March 5, 2013, 02:45 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
March 5, 2013, 03:13 PM | #12 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,459
|
Wilson Combat has (or used to have) two product lines: They had their bar stock or tool steel parts, and then they had their "Value Line" parts, which are (or were) MIM. The Value Line parts typically sold for just about half the price of the comparable tool steel parts.
Boogieman, my guess is that someone at Wilson put a value Line part of the wrong package. If that's the case, even if it works, you didn't get what you paid for and it should be returned for that reason alone. Either that, or Wilson should refund half of what you paid. |
March 5, 2013, 04:22 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Deerfield,New Hampshire
Posts: 512
|
Nope,don't need a Police report but a pic would be nice.
I've never had a part fail that wasn't abused, that I can remember. Last edited by giaquir; March 5, 2013 at 05:12 PM. |
March 5, 2013, 05:03 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 963
|
Could it be Investment and not MIM??? Just ask'en because I find seams on
some of Rugers stuff. |
March 5, 2013, 06:51 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
|
I've been in this game for over a half century, this is just my opinion and I don't expect or care if any one else shares it or disagrees with it. Just a simple statement. I really believe all this talk about mim parts is nothing more that that. Much a do about nothing. Jet Fighters and transports use mim parts, in both critical and non critical parts , Nascar uses mim parts in their engines. I bet there isn't a gun manufacture in the work that doesn't use some mim parts ( other than a few custom makers, and that just for bragging rights}, I really don 't think you can find a peice of equipment made to day that doesn't use some mim parts.. Mim parts have no higher breakage records than any other type of manufactured part, be it machined or stamped. Of course that is just my opinion and every one has their own, some opinions are based on fact and experience , some on bath room rumors and some from so called gun rag pistoleros. But then again , this world would be a dull place if every one thought alike
__________________
Ron James |
March 5, 2013, 06:59 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
My opinion is that MIM parts are used instead of forged or barstock parts because they are cheaper, and some people don't want to buy a product, upon which their life may depend, that has parts chosen because they are cheaper.
The MIM trigger on my new S&W revolver cracked, visibly emanating from up inside the frame, after only some hundreds of rounds. I have a photocopy of the letter I sent to S&W, and the return shipping label that they sent as a result, if anyone wants that minimal level of documentation. It was repaired under warranty. I have more than a few MIM parts in various 1911s, and have never had any trouble with them. |
March 5, 2013, 09:06 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: November 22, 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 83
|
I have an old 1911 Llama I purchased in 1969. After 42 years the pin where the thumb safety pivots broke. I know the part was not MIM because MIM parts only started to be used in the 80’s. My point being that regardless if you have MIM, cast, forged or machined from bar stock you will always have the possibility of a flaw in the metal that will cause the part to break.
|
March 6, 2013, 08:31 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2011
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
As for the MIM arguments, they just supplant the old arguments for "cast v. forged". If it is done correctly, MIM is suitable for gun parts. Cobra even uses it for the barrel of their Shadow .38 Spec. revolver. I found that surprising. An earlier thread: http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=386344
__________________
QUANTITATIVE AMMUNITION SELECTION |
|
March 7, 2013, 01:16 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
|
Quote:
|
|
March 7, 2013, 01:49 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Exactly - some people don't realize that in many cases, hand-filing and fitting can increase the expense for a particular part without increasing its value.
If I were to show you two metal cubes, with each one being 1" on a side, plus or minus 0.001", and then told you that one cube came out of the mold in the exact condition it's in now, while the other was rough-cast and then lovingly filed into shape over the course of several hours by highly-paid master craftsman, does that make the second cube any more valuable? Of course not. |
March 7, 2013, 02:11 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
|
Quote:
A 1" MIM cube would be difficult to remove the binder from without internally damaging the part. As long as you're just making them for looks, you'll be fine. But if it's something you're going to bet your life on, the second cube would be MUCH more valuable assuming you used a documented casting process. Some basic guidelines for MIM parts here: http://www.ssisintered.com/metal-injection-molding.html |
|
March 7, 2013, 02:31 PM | #22 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
FWIW, the wording on the box sounds funny. It says that the part is "manufactured from bar stock steel." It does not say "made from bar stock" or "machined from bar stock", which would be the normal way of saying that it was made by milling from bar stock.
I suspect word play here and some intentional deception. "Bar stock steel" can be any kind of steel alloy that is available in round or square bars, which really means about any steel, say 1040 steel. 1040 steel can be available in bar stock, so it could be called "bar stock steel." But that steel can also be forged and machined, cast and machined, or formed by MIM. So, if 1040 is available as "bar stock steel" then an MIM part made from 1040 steel is "manufactured from bar stock steel." Jim |
March 7, 2013, 04:42 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
Quote:
$100+ barstock ambidextrous safeties are not more expensive than $30 MIM ambis? So, if the MIM parts are not cheaper to make, how can they be priced so much less than parts made via the other processes? |
|
March 7, 2013, 04:53 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
It depends on which steps you include in the "making" of the part. The materials and equipment for making MIM parts might not be any cheaper than for other processes, but when an MIM part comes out of the mold, quite often that's the end of the process - it's finished, and already within specs.
With other processes, there are additional labor-intensive steps, and that's what drives the price up. But the MIM part isn't necessarily "lower quality" just because of the fact that it doesn't require the additional steps. To use an analogy - let's say you have two types of automotive paint, and the cost-per-gallon and cost to apply them are the same for both. But with paint 'A', as soon as it dries, you're done - the finish is slick, glossy and perfect. With paint 'B', you have to do extensive wet-sanding and polishing to get the same slick finish. It's going to cost more to paint a car using paint 'B', but that doesn't mean that it's "better" than paint 'A'. It's also not incorrect to say that paint 'A' costs as much as paint 'B', if you're just talking about the materials and application cost, not the labor-intensive follow-on steps. |
March 7, 2013, 05:45 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
I didn't address "better", only cheaper, in my comments. A $15 hammer IS cheaper than a $50 hammer.
|
|
|