The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 7, 2006, 07:59 AM   #1
PinnedAndRecessed
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2004
Posts: 449
Check my math.

Is this math correct?

Powder conversion factor:
1 gram = 15.4 grains
1 pound = 453.6 grams
6985.44 grains in a pound

If I load a 9mm with 4.3 Unique, then:
6985.44/4.3 = 1624.5 cartridges per pound.

Therefore I get 16 boxes of 100 out of every pound.

If powder is $15/pound, then the cost per box of 100 = $.94.
PinnedAndRecessed is offline  
Old March 7, 2006, 08:32 AM   #2
Sport45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 25, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
Close enough for what you're doing. The direct conversion from pounds to grains is 1# = 7000 grains (exact).
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter.
Sport45 is offline  
Old March 7, 2006, 08:32 AM   #3
HSMITH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 21, 2002
Posts: 2,019
I came up with 3.5 more rounds per pound than you, and $.92 per box of 100.....

For all intents and purposes our math is the same.
HSMITH is offline  
Old March 9, 2006, 01:28 AM   #4
Smokey Joe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2001
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 2,106
You're all forgetting something!

Pinned and Recessed--and others--Yr math is impeccable but you're forgetting one factor that plagues every reloader I know: Spillage. It is next to impossible to reload 1624.5 cartridges without spilling a bit of powder here and there. Which will throw off yr calculations.

With my target loads of Win 231, I get 2058 rounds per pound. Yeah, right! Due to the occasional spill, I don't believe anyone can be that precise in their calculations.

BTW, P 'n' R--What does the .5 cartridge look like??
__________________
God Bless America

--Smokey Joe
Smokey Joe is offline  
Old March 9, 2006, 11:41 AM   #5
cdoc42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 13, 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,687
Your math is correct, but there's a difference of opinion regarding the actual values for the conversion tables.

The use of "grains" is really a pharmaceutical term and dates back to when Apothecaries filled prescriptions. Today, things are rounded off so loosely it is hard to get accurate numbers.

It used to be that 64.8mg = 1 grain, so that 1 Gram (1000mg) would be 15.43grains. Today's Remington's Practice of Pharmacy says there's 60mg in a grain!

It has always been generally accepted that there are 454Gm in a pound, or 28.38 Gm in a ounce. But I was taught there are 28.35 Gm in an ounce, so that means we have 453.6 Gm in a pound!

So if we accept that, 453.6 x 15.43 = 6999.05 gr in a pound.

As such, I have always used 7000 grains as my reference.

The only concern I would have with your numbers is when the cost goes from under a buck to over a buck.
cdoc42 is offline  
Old March 9, 2006, 12:21 PM   #6
Leftoverdj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 934
You must be buying kegs to get Unique for $15 a pound.

Y'all might recall a hubbub a few years back about "slippery math". That's the concept that reasonable approximations are often as useful as exact calculation.

The slippery math approach would be 7000 grains to the pound, 2000 3.5 grain charges, about a 3/4 that many 4.7 grain charges or 1500 to the pound so about a buck a hundred.

Easy to do in your head, allows a little for spillage, and plenty close for our purposes.
Leftoverdj is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10264 seconds with 8 queries