|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 8, 2022, 10:41 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 2008
Location: The mini-hill country of Texas
Posts: 254
|
S&W Model 29-2 Nickel - yeah or nay?
6" bbl - no box - very good condition $1500
At first I was going to jump on this but after surfing around a little on the internet, I'm not sure it's that good of a deal. What say you? |
October 8, 2022, 11:12 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
|
Friend of mine bought one of those back in 76 for $450.
It was a hyper inflated price, then...still is, in my opinion...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
October 8, 2022, 11:20 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,598
|
It would be a fair price if the gun was in mint condition with no flaws and then original grips.
__________________
Say when..... |
October 8, 2022, 12:48 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 10, 2014
Posts: 1,378
|
Yes, Gun only is about $300 out of line. That’s considering gun is it 95% with original grips.
$1200 is average price for 29-2 hi condition, Gun only. I find Nickel S&Ws unless NIB or like NiB are hard to get rid of. I got 57 83/8” Nickle for close to a year ago. Haven’t had any luck trading for a 29-2. 6.5”. If it was blue would have been gone in heart beat. |
October 8, 2022, 12:53 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 2008
Location: The mini-hill country of Texas
Posts: 254
|
Think I'll pass on this one. Thanks guys!
|
October 8, 2022, 05:45 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2020
Posts: 497
|
Quote:
Not to mention, S&W’s old-school Nickel-finished revolvers are waaay over-valued in comparison to their same-condition blued counterparts. As someone else said, if it was in near-mint/LNIB condition, that would be different.
__________________
I use the Jake Brake every chance I get. Don't care if it annoys you. Hear me now?! |
|
October 8, 2022, 09:26 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Posts: 226
|
My 2 nickel 29-2's from the early 70's have held way better than my blue guns. I prefer nickel.
|
November 15, 2022, 04:37 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 3,210
|
I'll leave the value decision to others, but will tell you that my old 29 would shoot loose pretty easily with magnum ammo. Collector's value aside, they're not great shooters. So I wouldn't buy it, as I'm not into safe queens.
You COULD offer him $1200 though, right?
__________________
-Jeremy "Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength." - Eric Hoffer |
November 16, 2022, 08:51 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 890
|
29-2s don't have the strengthening package which came about in 1989, so they don't make the best shooters, unless you keep pressures down. My 29-2 is a Mag-na-ported 4" and as a defensive pistol I keep velocity down to under 1100 fps. Faster follow up shots and less wear on the revolver.
|
November 17, 2022, 09:51 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 1999
Location: California
Posts: 2,716
|
I had a nickel one. Swapped for blue very quickly.
Finally just quit 44 mag. |
November 17, 2022, 02:29 PM | #11 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
|
Quote:
I've got one, and shoot it with loads in the 1100fps range, not because I'm concerned about wear or stress on the gun, but because full house magnum loads in that gun hurt a bit, even with pachmayr grips. Just not fun. I have other .44mags with different grip shapes for shooting full house magnum loads that don't hurt, and I use them for that rather than the S&W.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
|
|