April 30, 2009, 02:22 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 42
|
In defense of others
If this is a taboo topic or one that has run its course, I am sorry, but as a new CCW license holder, it is on my mind.
If you come across a violent felony in progress, involving a stranger, is it generally a better idea to try to intervene passively by calling 911 and never by drawing your weapon if it doesn't involve you or your family? I realize I am not a freelance LEO now but a few weeks ago the convenience store was held up at gunpoint and a customer drew his weapon and shot the robber. It was repeated in a similar situation a week later. Reading about it in the paper had me wondering what I would have done. I suppose it depends on the individual and my feeling is most would like to avoid the legal fees and time required to defend themselves in a civil suit, as well as the moral issues coming with a shooting, but I am not so sure I could walk away from a helpless person being assaulted and am not physically blessed to do it with my hands. |
April 30, 2009, 02:35 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2009
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 439
|
this can keep a person thinking.
my simple philosophy is 1)protect me/mine from threat 2)if a felony (assualt, rape, armed robbery, etc) is happening right near me but I'm still a little distance away, I probably will take some kind of cover first then assess what is going on. If I can be of significant help and stop someone or make someone run and then assist the victim. I'll do what I can. that doesn't mean I'm walking towards armed robber point weapon at them and giving LEO commands. That's not what I am. I know of two situations when people I know (one a friend, the other family) did step in and here are the situations... 1) my friend was driving home and slowed down at a light. He witnessed a women on her knees being kicked around (literally) by a man. She was screaming and bleeding. My friend got out of the car, got fairly close with his snub .357 and fired a shot into an empty muddy drainage ditch. The kicker stopped and turned around and my friend called 911 and the kicker complied and backed off the woman. The cops arrested the kicker, helped the woman, and just interviewed and released my friend. 2) my brother was at a home depot late one evening. walking to his truck he witnessed a man pushing a woman up against a car and choking her. My brother dropped his bag at his truck, and walked toward the couple. When about 20 feet away, he yelled at the man to stop. At that moment, both the man and the woman turned and began to walk towards my brother. They kept coming until he crouched down and pulled out his ccw when they were about 12 feet away and increasing their pace. They stopped moving and he briskly backed to his vehicle and left. He did not call anyone. Nor was he ever questioned or called. |
April 30, 2009, 03:00 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
When you pull & use a gun, you are gambling literally everything you own on getting it right and being legally justified. You are gambling your job, your home, and every penny you have in the bank. You are gambling your marriage and your ability to watch your children grow up in person instead of from jail. You are gambling every friendship you've ever made, every dollar you've ever earned or will earn, and your family's future happiness. You are risking sleep disturbances, flashbacks, nightmares, impotence, anorexia, alcoholism, drug reliance, and a long and bitter lifetime of regret if you get it wrong.
To take a gamble that big, it's a good idea to be overwhelmingly certain there's no other way out. Is the life of a stranger worth a gamble that size? Depending on your personal morals, maybe he is. But never ever ever in an ambiguous situation, especially when you didn't see the prelude and don't know the players. Personally, I'm not taking that gamble unless I am overwhelmingly sure of who the players are, who's the good guy, who's the bad guy, and what provoked the whole thing. A scene that I just stumbled on, where I don't know either one of the participants, simply cannot meet that standard. This might sound as if I don't believe in intervening at all, but that's not true: I'll intervene in unambiguous situations where I'm certain of my ground. In situations where I'm not overwhelmingly certain, I'll still intervene -- by calling the cops. Calling the cops IS acting. It's just not quite as macho as rushing in. pax |
April 30, 2009, 03:06 PM | #4 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
Gun or No Gun...
Right or wrong I am goin' in to help the underdog. I would prefer to peaceably end the situation verbally but will go to any and all means available to me to do so. I am not positive the person getting kicked/beaten/stabbed don't deserve punishment but I am going to try to break it up and let the official umpires of life LEO and Judges decide. Having owned bulldogs for hunting and pets for many years I know sometimes they just gonna scrap. I "choke" them apart and get down to the brass tacks of who wanted a piece of who and why. Just natural for me to intervene. Do I worry about my own well being? YESSS!!! I would be crazy not to... But I do not consider any legal ramifications for being involved. Seems if you try to do right for others and stay neutral, it works out in the end. Lucky so far to never have been in a bind since I was 17 and in a "Kettle's Restaurant" when a crazed boa wearin' individual sissy slurred expletives at the waitress, slung hot coffee at her and threw the coffee mug at her but missed. I sprayed him down with "Halt" mailman mace to slow his escape and found out the cops were called on ME... Burned rubber on the Moto Guzzi right on outta there too! Brent |
April 30, 2009, 03:08 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 42
|
Wow! That last one (Pax's post) got me overwhelmingly thinking. Very good food for thought, considering I am the sole breadwinner for my family and a stepfather of a girl who came from a broken past with very little future and also, I believe, the light in a 4 year old's life, my little girl.
Without me, I can't imagine what would become of them and I can't imagine my girl growing up without me. |
April 30, 2009, 03:25 PM | #6 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
Pink, I knew you didn't mean mine...
Brent |
April 30, 2009, 03:29 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2009
Location: Yale MI
Posts: 163
|
All these situations you happen upon a scene and assume what is occurring. You have no idea of the specifics of the situation. The man with the tattoos and long beard choking the woman in the parking lot may be an undercover police officer struggling with a woman he is trying to arrest for gun possession. Your interference may cause him to loose control of a criminal and she may shoot him or you. If you are going to react to a situation you happen along you better be very sure of what is occurring. Your CCW is for the protection of yourself and the people who are with you. If you want to protect innocent crime victims, become a police officer. That being said, if that bearded, tattooed man is chasing a woman down the street in his underwear caring a butcher knife, he is probably not the police. If you can stop him without causing yourself undue harm, that may be OK. If you are in a party store that is getting robbed, give the bad guys the money and they will leave. Don't turn a robbery into a shootout or you may be the one suffering the negative unintended consequences.
|
April 30, 2009, 03:57 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 42
|
Actually, hogdog, your post DID get me thinking..
I got to thinking about whether or not the Kettle restaurant you mentioned was the same one on the way to Tampa, in Thonotosassa I think, that serves the best country fried steak i have ever had |
April 30, 2009, 04:10 PM | #9 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
This'n was Lafayette Louisiana in about 1985 or so...
And yes the country fried steak was GRAND as was the Biscuits and Gravy... Brent |
April 30, 2009, 04:21 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 42
|
Yumm, now I have forgotten about saving innocent people from felons and have to battle a growling stomach instead.
|
April 30, 2009, 05:18 PM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: April 19, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
Flapjack is right - It is extremely dangerous to get involved with lethal firepower unless you are 100% sure of what is going on. If you are not in danger yourself, you may be far more help to someone by calling the cops. Personally, if I am unarmed and engaged in some kind of struggle with a BG and a civilian pulls a gun on him, I will probably be glad for the chance to escape - but I could very easily get killed in the crossfire regardless, or end up getting dragged away to some unknown location in the BG's attempt to escape the threat. There are just too many variables, in my opinion, to jump into an unknown situation with a gun. My .02 - I know a lot of people will disagree with me, and I respect that. |
|
April 30, 2009, 05:22 PM | #12 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
wow one point where florida gives us more lee way than texas... Our castle doctrine stand your ground is extended to "anywhere I am legally allowed to be" and defense of others is granted the same protection from suits as if defending my self. The shoot just has to be deemed "justifiable"...
Brent |
April 30, 2009, 05:48 PM | #13 | |
Member
Join Date: April 19, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
Even before, however, the penal code only required retreat if a reasonable person in the actor's situation would have retreated. And reasonableness is a jury issue. And a jury of one's peers in Texas is likely to have more than a handful of individuals who think that not retreating in most instances is perfectly reasonable |
|
April 30, 2009, 05:55 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2008
Posts: 216
|
last I checked Texas is the same way... you do NOT have to retreat. As a matter of fact if I see a person raping a woman, I can shoot. If I see a man beating the heck out of a woman, I can shoot. Any crime that is considered felony aggrevated assault is basically justified. Read your CHL handbook, and I mean a current one. If I remember correctly alot of things have changed recently. In texas we can now use lethal force on trespassers. I personally would not, but you can. I have had to draw my weapon on a guy that was literally almost twice my size and charging me down, the reason is simple. If he punches me, or knocks me down, he now has access to my firearm. When I get time I will find the Chapter, and subsection on these things and post em up.
Clay |
April 30, 2009, 05:57 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2008
Posts: 216
|
you already corrected it by the time I got my response typed out. Texas is by far the best state to live in when it comes to backing the CHL holders and giving them the most leeway.
Clay |
April 30, 2009, 06:30 PM | #16 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
|
|
April 30, 2009, 06:38 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2009
Location: Shallowater, Texas
Posts: 444
|
I think a person is taking a big chance, trying to stop a crime in progress.
I guess if I faced a decision when I knew an innocent person was going to be killed, I would intervine, as long as I didnt have my kids with me. I would hate for my children to get in the crossfire of a gunfight. If they were with me I would go to a safe place and call police. I dont want to sound like a coward, but I would put my famlies saftey in front of a strangers anyday.
__________________
A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares about more than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. |
April 30, 2009, 07:07 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,417
|
Been there, done that.
I see two completely different scenario types: 1) I >>know<< what's going on. In other words, I'm dead certain as to who the bad guy is. I'm in a grocery store, guy comes in wearing a ski mask, shoots the register clerk in the leg. No hesitation, I'm going to draw and fire on anybody who is a lethal threat to myself or others. 2) I don't. And that's one hell of a lot more likely. I've actually been in one of each of these - except the "type 1" involved two dogs as the assailants, which means the potential legal problems are far less. (Armed with only a knife, I got between the two dogs and their human victim - the dogs ran off.) In the "type 2", I walked onto a subway car (BART in Oakland Cali) to find four lunatics trying to kick a guy to death. I thought the nutcases were women. I pushed them off of their down-on-his-belly victim while yelling "it's over" repeatedly, rocked 'em a few steps back, the downed party ran to the next car back, I retreated to cover his exit. Which was a damned good thing - at about 18 paces out I get two nasty surprises: two of the loonies had claw hammers (one dripping blood) and then one of the bystanders said "hey, those are guys!". So I ended up staring down four homicidal transvestites with my hand on a belt knife ready to draw it at their first approach. Backed into a corridor it would have been ugly but possible to do 4:1 odds. They backed off, got caught, prosecuted, the innocent (it turned out) victim shook my hand at the DA's office, charges dropped to misdemeanors(!), nine months later one of these jackarses tried to kill an Oakland cop with a knife, a year later the deputy DA blew his brains out. I faced no legal problems whatever other than testifying as a witness. What I did RIGHT was to act immediately yet not go to lethal force until it was absolutely no-other-choice. And it never got there. What I did wrong was not watching their hands. I focused on the boots they were stomping him with, but it's the hands that kill a lot quicker. I survived that blooper because I was in, did the rescue and broke close contact all within a second or two tops. They didn't have time to "nail" me (pardon the pun). Classic case of "stupid but FAST response still worked". Had I seen the hammers (again, one dripping blood), I'd have pulled that knife but held off and given a verbal challenge first. I might have also pulled the 4-shot 22Magnum minirevolver in my front right pocket and faced an illegal CCW bust...as it was nobody ever found out I had a wee little backup plan on me . Remember: for all I knew, the downed party had at least some of it coming for purse snatching or whatever. Turns out not, but I had no idea. He recovered just fine by the way...passed out with a concussion on scene but he was fine by the time we met at the DA's office. I also decided on a new rule after this event and doing more study: never get between two parties who still want a piece of each other. Only when a fight is totally one-sided is it at all smart (not very but what the hell) to intervene.
__________________
Jim March |
April 30, 2009, 07:08 PM | #19 | |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
ar15, Please understand this is not a jab at your post. I just have to use this line as it fits so well with much of the situation... On both sides of the spectrum...
Quote:
Two things I live by are... "If you don't stand for something you will fall for anything." In this case I stand for the right to live in happiness without the threat of being preyed upon by human vultures and hyenas. Second one is... "If you aren't living on the edge, you are just taking up space." This one is a little out there for typical day to day business but witnessing violent crime is not business as usual for the most part either. Brent |
|
April 30, 2009, 07:30 PM | #20 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
I think Pax nailed it. You'd better understand what's at risk, which is EV-A-REE-THING and you'd better be certain that you're right.
So far as the moral question, I don't think it can ever be morally wrong to help someone who needs help.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
April 30, 2009, 09:11 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,014
|
I just had a off-duty situation that is analogous to this subject. I was coming home on the subway and the train was delayed in the station. I observed the security guard running to the engineer, when he came back I flashed the tin and asked what's the problem. He said a passenger stated he had a gun. I had him point him out. I drew down and had him put his hands up. However, I couldn't cover him and cuff him at the same time. I proffered my cuffs to the guard and he said he didn't know how to cuff. So I reholstered (refannypacked ) and cuffed, searched him and proceeded to wait fifteen minutes for backup.
The point is you have to weigh the risk and the benefits of action. I could've just stayed out of it but what if he really had a gun and started shooting. |
April 30, 2009, 09:41 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
|
Advice to "always" do something is generally as poor as advise to "never" do something.
As to what to do: Weigh each situation and act accordingly. I'm in the camp that leans more toward intervention, as it turns out, but not always or even most of the time.
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective |
April 30, 2009, 10:16 PM | #23 | |
Member
Join Date: February 13, 2007
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
Especially when more than likely the stranger had the same options as yourself to procure a CCW , firearm and necessary training to protect oneself........If they felt their life wasn't worth the time or energy , why should I risk all for them? I don't have a team of lawyers or insurance paid for by taxpayer's money to cover my ass....... Defense of a child, will be the only third party I will ever defend. |
|
April 30, 2009, 11:11 PM | #24 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
I find this subject no different than jumping into the St.Johns river to save a toddler who slipped off the shallow bar and went under. Or swimming across the same river to save the STUPID chocolate lab that couldn't find the thrown stick but wouldn't quit looking until he about drowned and needed a full 50-70 yard river rescue... a few others come to mind but rendering aid is all equal to me...
Not for everyone, but for me it is as easy as pie to go after it. I think I draw the line at jumping into a shark attack to save someone though Brent |
April 30, 2009, 11:46 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,210
|
I think its all circumstantial. If I am walking by a bar and two drunks are whopping up on one, I'll just call the cops. If I'm in a place thats being held up, I'm complying unless I die otherwise. Then there are some situations where you couldn't help but intervene. Imagine you get off a bus and you see a man trying to force a woman at gun point to let him in the car that contains a child. How bout a mass shooting type situation? I remember reading an account from one of the heroic journalist who was trapped in the Mumbai attacks. He took some of the photos we all saw splashed across the news and Internet. One thing he said really stuck with me...
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|