|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 18, 2017, 08:27 PM | #1 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,840
|
WW II British tanker's assessment of the Sten and .38 Webley
From the recently published book, Tank Action by David Render, we get troop leader Render's opinion of British small arms.
Quote:
Render's squadron commander, Capt. John Semken, gets into a close range duel against a Tiger I. Knowing that the AP round was ineffective against the frontal armor of a Tiger, he instructed his squadron to use only HE and to smother the Tiger with them. If nothing else, it could break the periscopes and vision blocks and disable the Tiger. His gunner does just that and when the Tiger's driver is injured, the commander orders his crew to abandon their tank. The book is a good read for anyone interested in WW II tank combat.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
|
September 18, 2017, 09:28 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2017
Posts: 351
|
It does seem odd that an army which fielded the sturdy and efficient Enfield would
saddle their tankers with such shoddy sidearms and subs. There probably can be no worse endorsement for a sidearm than to say "We replaced it with an enemy's pistol at the first opportunity." |
September 19, 2017, 01:36 AM | #3 | ||
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
Quote:
Small arms training, particularly handgun, during WWII was not extensive, in any army. I'm sure the author is honestly recounting his experience. as he remembers it. The British .38/200 round is the US .38 S&W, it is NOT as powerful as the .38 Special. Muzzle velocity is in the 600fps range. Yet the gun "kicked like a mule" but at the same time "lacked penetrating power" and you were lucky to hit a man at 20 paces... I think, like a lot of other young lads who went to war, he never got any kind of decent training with his issue weapons, and formed some opinions that while valid for him, shouldn't always be applied as a general rule. The trigger of the .38 Enfields are not great (DA is very heavy) and the sights are poor, making the gun difficult to shoot well, but not impossible for someone experienced.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
||
September 19, 2017, 02:02 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,826
|
A few things doesn't sound right.
The .38 webley shouldn't kick that bad. I don't get why it needed to be fired in "cowboy style". The sten was cheap. But 5 schillings is 1/4 of a pound or $1. The liberator in 45acp cost about $2 at the time . That makes no sense. A sten could fire when dropped? I have heard it was uncomfortable to shoot and the trigger was lousy. Haven't heard it was unsafe. It shouldn't be clumsier than any other sub-gun with magazine sticking out, sideway or not. A P-08 is nice to look at. In real battle, I would have a Browning hi power or even a Walter p38. Luger and mp40? They might be shot by other tommies thinking they were jerries in British uniforms. I would take the gentleman's words with a grain of salt. -TL Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk |
September 19, 2017, 03:00 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
|
Thanks for the book recommendation. Sounds very interesting.
There's been a couple of WWII books that have come out fairly recently that have been really good, first person accounts of what went on in WWII. Another is 'Thunder Below' a WWII submarine book by Eugene B. Fluckey who, among other things, sent some of his sailors ashore to set charges so a railroad train would be blown up. It was interesting to hear them discuss what to use for a triggering device. Thunder Below: https://www.amazon.com/Thunder-Below...=thunder+below Tank Action: https://www.amazon.com/Tank-Action-A...5807481&sr=1-1 |
September 19, 2017, 06:04 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,968
|
I have owned both weapons.
With the Sten SMG, I agree with him. It malfunctions regularly and the sights are basically just for looks. I sold mine: I was trying to compete in local club matches with it but it wasn't competitive. It wasn't reliable and was difficult to hit anything with. I had a goofy set-up on mine using a red dot that was basically attached to the receiver with a muffler clamp type of thing some local guy made that had two clamps with a piece of rail on it. IF you could get through a stage without having a malfunction, you had a chance to win. I never dropped mine, so I don't know about that. The pistol on the other hand, I still own and I really like it. Mine is quite accurate and has almost no recoil at all. As was mentioned, this round is not as potent as a .38 Special: recoil is not much more than a .22 LR.
__________________
You know the rest. In the books you have read How the British Regulars fired and fled, How the farmers gave them ball for ball, From behind each fence and farmyard wall, Chasing the redcoats down the lane, Then crossing the fields to emerge again Under the trees at the turn of the road, And only pausing to fire and load. |
September 19, 2017, 06:06 AM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,840
|
I personally don't think the 38 Webley needs to be fired "cowboy" style (not sure what "cowboy style" is despite his description of left hand over the top). Rather it's rather the lack of proper firearms instructions with revolvers at Sandhurst.
As for the Sten, it's fired from an open bolt. The early Uzis that didn't have the grip safety were also know to discharge when dropped. Re: Thunder Below, I have an autographed copy from Adm. Flunkey.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
September 19, 2017, 06:46 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2013
Posts: 117
|
I let a British friend shoot my handguns on one of his visits over. Just regular old .38s and .45s. He had exactly the same response. I believe seeing all the cowboy movies and having never actually fired a weapon distorted his perception of recoil. He was surprised to say the least.
|
September 19, 2017, 09:11 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,826
|
Quote:
-TL |
|
September 19, 2017, 09:56 AM | #10 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
"A sten could fire when dropped? I have heard it was uncomfortable to shoot and the trigger was lousy. Haven't heard it was unsafe. It shouldn't be clumsier than any other sub-gun with magazine sticking out, sideway or not."
Yes, it could. If the bolt was closed on an empty chamber, and it was dropped on the butt, inertia could cause the bolt to compress just enough to strip a round from the magazine and fire it. That was a trait that was a problem with a number of submachine gun designs, mostly those that "slam" fired from an open bolt and which had a fixed firing pin. The MK IV and later versions corrected this problem by allowing the cocking handle to be locked into a slot when the bolt was down on an empty chamber. The Sten might not have been the best weapon, but it was what Britain needed. After Dunkirk, the British had to replace huge amounts of weapons for its standing army and also had to equip new troops. Production of the Lee Enfield wasn't enough to cover it all, and supplies of the Thompson from the United States also couldn't be counted on to fill the need. Copying the MP-40 magazine also brought known problems to the Sten. The location of the magazine on the side was an issue for armor troops, as it made the gun a lot more difficult to handle. But, it was still better than nothing. Regarding the revolver, remember that armor troops were issued double-action only versions of the Enfield, the No 2 Mk I*, due to complaints about the hammer spur catching on things inside the tank. I agree that the author's complaints about inaccuracy are more of a training issue. All of the DAO Enfields I've fired over the years have had relatively light double action pulls, certainly better than the Nagant, or even the DA first shot pull on the Walther P38.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
September 19, 2017, 10:53 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2017
Posts: 351
|
"like the number of guys in Vietnam, who "replaced" their M16 with an AK47 when they got a chance ?"
There ya go. Just like that. |
September 19, 2017, 11:31 AM | #12 | |||
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Another good read about tanks & tankers is "Death Traps" by Belton Cooper. Cooper worked tank recovery, and is brutally honest about the way our command created high losses. After the unexpectedly high losses fighting our way out of Normandy, replacing / repairing a knocked out tank was easier than finding TRAINED replacement crewmen. Literally, if a replacement recruit had seen a tank in basic training, he got put into a tank in France. Sometimes, green crews got a chance to fire a few shots, before going into combat, but not always, by any means.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|||
September 19, 2017, 12:03 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2000
Posts: 4,193
|
Quote:
I wish I had an MP-40.
__________________
Pilot |
|
September 19, 2017, 12:17 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,826
|
Quote:
-TL |
|
September 19, 2017, 12:34 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,826
|
Quote:
Does the mp-40 have the same feature? It is also an open bolt design. -TL Edit: Holding down a revolver with left hand? That hand would hurt pretty bad. Last edited by tangolima; September 19, 2017 at 12:40 PM. |
|
September 19, 2017, 01:44 PM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
Early production MP-38s would fire if dropped on the butt with the bolt down on an empty chamber.
Later production MP-38s, and all MP-40s, had notches that the bolt handle could be pushed into to serve as a safety. The forward notch served to hold the bolt closed and prevent drop fires. This replica (scroll through the pictures) shows the notches. http://www.jbmilitaryantiques.com.au...-gun-by-denix/
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
September 19, 2017, 03:10 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
|
Quote:
I should have mentioned that among Adm. Flunkey's many decorations is the Medal of Honor. I also should have mentioned that it was very interesting to see how a submarine crew were able to arm and outfit the shore party, made up of the sailors on the submarine, that blew up the train. It wasn't their primary mission but was a target of opportunity. They also launched rockets off the deck of the submarine to bombard the shore IIRC. |
|
September 19, 2017, 10:59 PM | #18 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
You can get certain SMG bolts to "bounce" without dropping them. You can swing an M3 (cover open bolt forward), and give it a sudden stop, and the bolt WILL move, maybe enough to strip a round and fire it. I've done it with EMPTY guns, I know it can happen.
Again, cover open. With the cover closed, the bolt is going nowhere, unless the tab holding it breaks. Jumping down from a truck, tank, apc, with the cover open, bolt forward COULD be enough to cause a discharge. DOING it with your finger on the trigger could dump part of the mag, or all of it, if you don't react fast enough.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
September 20, 2017, 06:34 AM | #19 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
"The recoil spring is also the main spring to ignite the cartridge, so it must be rather stout."
Actually, not really. Most submachine guns in this class have a relatively heavy bolt. It's the bolt's inertia that helps keep the action closed until pressure in the barrel drops enough for the action to open safely. By comparison, the main spring on most of these guns is relatively light. It really only needs to be heavy enough to arrest rearward motion of the bolt and push it forward again. It's the bolt's inertia that does the lion's share of actually firing the cartridge, not spring pressure. Of course, you do need a certain level of spring pressure to ensure that the bolt is arrested in its rearward movement and it moves quickly enough on the forward stroke, but it's not as much as you'd really think.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
September 20, 2017, 06:41 AM | #20 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
"In real battle, I would have a Browning hi power or even a Walter p38."
I'd rather have a Hi Power just for the magazine capacity. But remember, the Luger saw the German military through two world wars and through their period of Colonial expansion. It was well regarded as being reliable and accurate, even in very adverse conditions in the trenches.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
September 20, 2017, 10:10 AM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,826
|
Quote:
Not that it makes things any better, the discharge is most probably only one round. Hard for any one to keep the trigger pulled, while letting the bolt go rearward this far. I could be under estimating the creativity of certain kind. Thanks for info. -TL Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk |
|
September 20, 2017, 10:39 AM | #22 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
A lighter spring with longer bolt travel also gives a relatively softer feel to recoil and also makes the gun easier to cock, but it also makes the gun relatively harder to shoot accurately because the length of bolt travel tends to "walk" the gun.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
September 20, 2017, 10:47 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,826
|
Quote:
-TL Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk |
|
September 20, 2017, 10:58 AM | #24 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
They're only more accessible if you're either issued one or if you manage to capture one. Obviously, he wasn't issued one, as he talks about the .380 revolver, and almost all of the Hi Powers available to the British military were going to specialized troops, so capture is it.
Once you've captured a pistol to replace the gun you don't like, it's a lot less likely that you're going to search for a different one to replace the one you've got, especially given that the Luger was iconic and was considered to be quite the trophy. We're looking at it from the point of view of gun guys. He's obviously looking at it from the point of someone who has to fight, and wants better weapons, even if that means using captured weapons.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
September 20, 2017, 02:00 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
|
I suspect soldiers always complain about "lack of stopping power" to make up for inadequate training and poor marksmanship-cf. all the stories from Korea of M1 Carbine rounds failing to penetrate the Chinese padded uniforms. Though again, at 0200 in ten degrees below zero weather, howling winds, and a groggy and exhausted and sleep deprived GI or Marine. Likewise people have a "greatly exaggerated" view of fully automatic weapons, think all one has to do is "spray and pray".
|
|
|