August 21, 2011, 11:12 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2010
Posts: 364
|
Cut powder
I've been "listening" to the weigh vs volume powder charge (specifically for rifle) discussion on this forum (when it comes up) with regards to accuracy and the use of either technique.
I may have missed a thread on my specific question with regards to the debate.. My apologies if it's been asked and answered before: Using the volume charge method...when the charger cuts stick powder granules....does the cutting of granules of a portion of the charge have a (negligible/acceptable) effect? Sort of similar to a "tiny" difference in charge weight with the other method? |
August 21, 2011, 11:35 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: If you have to ask...
Posts: 2,860
|
That bothers me as well but apparently it doesn't bother the powder noticeably. If you were to somehow cut every stick of powder in a charge it may affect the burn rate somewhat. I think if you operate the measure in a deliberate manner so that you shear the offending sticks cleanly you should get a uniform charge.
OTOH I bought an RCBS ChargeMaster so I wouldn't have to worry about cutting sticks of powder.
__________________
Life Member NRA, TSRA Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call Lonesome Dove My favorite recipes start out with a handful of used wheelweights. |
August 22, 2011, 01:46 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: NEPA
Posts: 909
|
You should be calibrating your measure with a scale. You will be cutting some of the powder but not enough to make a difference. Most of the powder companies are now making short-cut mixtures to help eliminate this metering issue.
Last edited by PA-Joe; August 23, 2011 at 05:26 PM. |
August 22, 2011, 08:13 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2010
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
|
|
August 23, 2011, 02:35 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: I live in the foot of the Green Mountains of Vermont
Posts: 1,602
|
I'll bet PA-Joe doesn't know another way either !
|
August 23, 2011, 03:38 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Location: Sparks, Nevada, near Reno
Posts: 183
|
Some of the responders are thinking from the point of view that a cut kernal burns faster, but I believe the question is what is the end-effect.
When you cut a kernal, you need a little pressure, and get more vibration. The answer would depend on how the measure is mounted. Mine is mounted to a very heavy table with a 12" square piece of steel bolted to it. There are two 3/8" bolts thru the pedestal into the steel. There is almost no vibration, so there is almost no variation in powder charges. The best thing you can do, is to throw several charges and notice the charge weight in the charge AFTER the cut kernal. Depending on what cartridge, charge weight, and powder, as to if the variation is too much. The use of a measure causes some consistency issues, anyway, so it depends on what is acceptable. Have fun, Gene |
August 23, 2011, 07:41 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: I live in the foot of the Green Mountains of Vermont
Posts: 1,602
|
I always set my measure to dump a couple tenths light and trickle to target weight ! Never done it any other way !
|
August 23, 2011, 08:50 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2009
Location: Just off Route 66
Posts: 5,067
|
I also wondered what effect it would have, never seen a cut grain in 7 years of reloading. I was doing it the Oneoldsap way. Then went with a RCBS Chargemaster 1500 (no way for it to cut any powder). It does throw a tenth of a grain over now and then, but no big deal I just dump it back into the hopper.
Seems that that small of a variance would have little effect, but what do I know never having seen one. Jim
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum |
August 23, 2011, 09:04 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 25, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
|
I wonder if we're hearing grains being cut, or just the sound of them popping out of the way. The little buggers would be pretty hard to cut, being rather platic and all.
In any case, I quit worrying about that sound a long time ago. Doesn't seem to matter other than a weight variance if it messes with the smoothness of the throw.
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter. |
August 26, 2011, 10:59 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Location: Sparks, Nevada, near Reno
Posts: 183
|
My biggest concern is the difference of vibration, therefor changing the weight of the powder charge. I agree, throw the next charge back, or weigh it to see how much it varys.
Gene |
August 27, 2011, 10:23 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: If you have to ask...
Posts: 2,860
|
I avoided the issue by using a scoop & trickle method on an electronic scale. It's not a great method for large volumes but it's almost as fast as the ChargeMaster 1500 I'm using now. Big difference is that I can seat a bullet while the machine does the measuring. I use a powder measure for flake & ball powders, 1500 for the pesky sticks.
__________________
Life Member NRA, TSRA Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call Lonesome Dove My favorite recipes start out with a handful of used wheelweights. |
August 27, 2011, 01:19 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,730
|
Quote:
|
|
August 27, 2011, 01:57 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2011
Location: Southern Californis
Posts: 795
|
Deepcore:
I'm sort of old fashoned, I throw a charge of H4350 or H 4831 slightly under the charge wanted on to the sacle pan, then I use the tip of a table spoon to trickle up to the wanted charge. By using the same spoon you will soon learn how much powder to dip and need, in most cases, only two dips. Fast and efficient. Semper Fi. Gunnery sergeant Clifford L. Hughes USMC Retired |
|
|