The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 26, 2014, 06:38 PM   #1
Junior member
Join Date: September 8, 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 2,119
Remington 870 shell size question/concern

As we all know, there are a variety of Remington 870 models (Wingmaster, Express, Express Magnum, Police, or simple "870").

There are a variety of sizes shells these take, which seem arbitrary too:
2.75, 3, and 3.5 inch shells.

The danger comes when the shell size is listed only on the barrel, and not on the receiver.

Can a larger capacity barrel be placed on a lower capacity receiver, and if so, is there a danger is the receiver failing as a result?

For instance, let's say a factory 870 is limited to 2.75" shells. But the barrel with that stamp is replaced with a barrel which accepts up to 3" shells, and 3" shells are used. Will it feed, and will the receiver be at risk of failing?
leadcounsel is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 08:11 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: February 3, 2013
Posts: 1,235
Yes. If you look at a barrel chambered for 3.5" shells, most, if not all, tell you not to use 3.5" unless the barrel is on a supermag receiver. Otherwise you may encounter extraction and ejection issues with the longer shells.
Dreaming100Straight is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 08:19 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 8,544
The 3.5" receiver is different. You cannot make 3.5" shells work on any other gun.

If you have a receiver made for 2 3/4" shells it is possible to still use 3" shells as long as the barrel is made for 3" shells. The only real difference is the ejector which needs to be replaced. It wouldn't be dangerous, but ejection might not be reliable until modified.

The real danger is using 3" shells in a 2 3/4" chamber or 3.5" shells in a 3" chamber. They will fit. The marked length of shotgun shells is the length after they are fired. The unfired length is 1/4-1/2" shorter than marked. There has to be room for the crimp to unfold.
jmr40 is offline  
Old March 26, 2014, 08:23 PM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2012
Location: Williamsburg, Va.
Posts: 1,287
The 3" and standard 2-3/4" guns are identical except for the ejector, ejector spring, and of course chamber length. Some standard guns actually left the factory with 3" ejector components anyway. If the barrel fits, you can safely shoot a shell the length of the chamber, but it may not eject properly. I do not think a fired 3-1/2" shell can be pried out of the smaller ejection port, but I can't say as I haven't tried it. Some people will say a 3-1/2" shell is not safe because of the higher SAAMI pressure levels, but I say the bolt locks into the barrel extension, and the receiver profile is the same, and it would be safe to fire, but as noted it won't eject properly. I also think if it wasn't safe Remington would have made it so a 3-1/2" barrel wouldn't physically fit, because they have to know someone is going to try it.
What could have happened... did.

I do not trust Remington's dating service accuracy. If they were, you could end up with Nancy Pelosi.
Virginian is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2017 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08156 seconds with 9 queries