The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 27, 2013, 02:52 PM   #26
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 8,542
I have both, never had a single issue with either. The McCormicks are cheaper, so I have more of them.
jmr40 is offline  
Old October 27, 2013, 09:47 PM   #27
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 1999
Location: Wyo-Tana
Posts: 1,287
Started out buying the Wilson 47D mags, for no particular reason. Heard too many good things about the CMC not to try them. I now buy CMC; cheaper and work perfectly. And they help me shoot straighter. OK, not really.
Remember, many times what we view as a curse in the present turns out to be a blessing in the future. Don't worry about it a lot. Things have a way of working out. Trust me on this one. - - Uncle Bill Martino
Sodbuster is offline  
Old October 29, 2013, 04:53 PM   #28
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: The shores of Lake Huron
Posts: 4,783
Have only McCormick mag, since they are available at gun shows, but not Wilson. Mcs are great. Would try Wilson if I didn't have to order it. But I really wish Pachmayr were still available. Hands down the best.
Join the NRA/ILA
I am the weapon; my gun is a tool. It's regrettable that with some people those descriptors are reversed.
Stevie-Ray is offline  
Old October 29, 2013, 05:05 PM   #29
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,935
I haven't had the more expensive Chip McCormick mags. I've only had Shooting Star 7 round mags. Most of them worked fine, but I had a couple of them that wouldn't feed well.
wayneinFL is offline  
Old October 29, 2013, 06:05 PM   #30
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2009
Posts: 341
Nthing wrong with Mc Cormicks mags. But I've got best results with Wilson's standard 47 mags in all my 1911's. Try both. Which ever works best in your gun is the right answer. Both equally as well? Which is cheaper and/or easier to get?
sigxder is offline  
Old October 30, 2013, 09:41 PM   #31
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,317
I chose Wilson Combat 47D magazines several years ago. So far they have been 100% reliable. I've never tried McCormick magazines buy I believe they have a similar reputation for quality.
Vietnam Veteran ('69-'70)
NRA Life Member
RMEF Life Member
lefteye is offline  
Old November 2, 2013, 01:01 AM   #32
Junior member
Join Date: October 27, 2013
Posts: 1,139
The Shooting Stars that I had were amazing in their ability to feed both ball and semi-wadcutter lead handloads perfectly. It is hard to imagine that a mag could be markedly better than that, especially for the price.
RX-79G is offline  
Old November 9, 2013, 07:03 AM   #33
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2001
Location: Boston, People's Republic of MA
Posts: 1,532
Had both. My mags see hard use. Right now my current favorites are the Chip McCormicks. They seem to hold up better. The mag housing is definitely sturdier than the WCs.

Note, I am referring to the PowerMags or PowerMag Plus, not the traditional, welded-base Shooting Star versions. These seem to come with a weaker spring that wears faster than the other versions.
Proud to have served.
Brian48 is offline  
Old November 9, 2013, 10:34 AM   #34
Senior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2011
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,044
I have about 18 CMC magazines including 8 and ten rounders and five 1911 pistols. The CMCs function perfectly in all five pistols, which are Colts and Dan Wessons.

Can't say enough good things about the CMC magazines. I am a fan. They work, look good, and hold a lot of rounds. I especially like the ten-rounders and no, I don't mind the thing sticking out of the grip.
The difference between a citizen and a civilian is that the citizen makes the safety of the body politic his personal responsibility, protecting it with his life. The civilian does not.
Rogervzv is offline  
Old November 11, 2013, 12:42 PM   #35
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Western WA
Posts: 7,181
I did have an issue with CMC followers "collapsing", the angle of the "v" between the upper and lower elements narrowing considerably. They were the cheaper 10-rounders, and CMC gave me a 50% trade-in value on new Power 10s.
I've not had any such issues with the Power 10s, Power 8s, or earlier Shooting Star 8s.
I suspect the defective followers were not properly tempered, and it was an isolated incident.
RickB is offline  
Old November 13, 2013, 09:55 AM   #36
Don P
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,656
For me price,CM shooting stars will cost half of the Wilson's so its 2 for the price of one and as stated I have had great luck with the CM mags so for now I'll stick with them
NRA Life Member, NRA Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA NROI Range Officer,
ICORE Range Officer, ICORE Match Director
,MAG 40 Graduate
As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be.
Don P is offline  
Old November 15, 2013, 08:35 AM   #37
Join Date: August 7, 2011
Posts: 19
Wilson Combat magazines are one the finest, and smoothest functioning, in my opinion.
I purchased three for my Kimber Ultra Raptor 1911, and left the Kimber factory mags in the box ....

They may cost a little more, but are completely worth it.

NRA Lifetime Member
1911Colt is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2016 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.14915 seconds with 9 queries