The Firing Line Forums recoil question
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Forum Rules Firearms Safety Firearms Photos Links Library Lost Password Email Changes
 Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Thread Tools Search this Thread
 June 30, 2013, 06:34 PM #1 NHSHOOTER Senior Member   Join Date: November 26, 2012 Location: Concord NH Posts: 673 recoil question I want to teach a young lady to shoot so she can hunt in this falls youth hunt, I have a model seven in 7-08 and load my own, my question is, is it better to load a light bullet light or a heavy bullet light to get the best lessened recoil results? Thanks in advance for you help..
 June 30, 2013, 07:28 PM #2 ligonierbill Senior Member   Join Date: May 20, 2007 Posts: 1,334 Light bullet, light charge. Find some 120's and go to start loads. You can also find some very light loads using pistol powders. I'm sure someone here can suggest some. A few years ago, I introduced my brother to a 7 mm Rem Mag with light 120 loads. They were real pussycats, but plenty accurate.
 June 30, 2013, 11:29 PM #3 Dixie Gunsmithing Staff   Join Date: April 27, 2013 Location: Ohio Posts: 1,923 Actually, if you use the same powder charge with a light bullet as you do a heavy, the light will have more recoil due to increased muzzle velocity (rep. energy). You have to drop the powder, too, if you want them to match. Last edited by Dixie Gunsmithing; July 1, 2013 at 12:47 AM.
 June 30, 2013, 11:40 PM #4 JohnKSa Staff   Join Date: February 12, 2001 Location: DFW Area Posts: 20,900 All else being equal, recoil is proportional to the momentum of the projectile, not the energy of the projectile. Momentum is proportional to the product of the velocity and the weight of the projectile. So assuming that the gun is the same and the powder charge is reasonably similar in weight, you can determine which of two loads will create less recoil by multiplying the muzzle velocity times the bullet weight and selecting the load that has the lowest product. __________________ Did you know that there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?
 July 1, 2013, 12:32 AM #5 Dixie Gunsmithing Staff   Join Date: April 27, 2013 Location: Ohio Posts: 1,923 Thanks John, I meant to say muzzle velocity, and don't know why I said energy. I must have been thinking of something else as I wrote it.
 July 1, 2013, 03:22 PM #6 NHSHOOTER Senior Member   Join Date: November 26, 2012 Location: Concord NH Posts: 673 Thanks for all the input, I know I can always count on good feedback here on "The Firing Line"...
 July 1, 2013, 03:48 PM #7 BigD_in_FL Junior member   Join Date: December 20, 2012 Location: The "Gunshine State" Posts: 1,981 Here ya go: If one knows the average velocity of the escaping propellant, the free recoil velocity (in a vacuum) is simply: V = ( b*v + c*p ) / W where b is the bullet's weight, v the muzzle velocity, c the charge weight, p the average velocity of the escaping propellant gases, and W is the rifle's weight.
 July 2, 2013, 08:04 AM #8 Rifleman1776 Senior Member   Join Date: April 25, 2010 Location: Arkansas Posts: 3,309 I would do considerable training with a .22lr before handing her a deer rifle. When she learns to shoot and has confidence, then put a cf in her hands. The -08 might be too much gun for a tiny girl. IMHO, the .243 is the perfect deer rifle for a small or younger person.
 July 2, 2013, 08:25 AM #9 Clark Senior Member   Join Date: December 4, 1999 Location: WA, the ever blue state Posts: 4,678 To deal with the recoil of an 8 pound rifle shooting a 338 250 gr at 2600 or a 7mm 150 gr at 3300 fps, I learned to use soft AND wide recoil pads. My favorite is the Limbsaver large grind to fit that I do not grind. The reasons for this are that recoil pain starts somewhere around 20 psi on the skin: 1) A soft recoil pad spreads the recoil over time as it compresses. 2) A soft recoil pad spreads the recoil over area to comply with the shape of the shoulder. 3) A wide and tall recoil pad spreads the recoil over area Together, these factors keep the worst spot on my shoulder skin below 20 psi, and I never feel any pain at all. I can shoot the magnums all day and not feel pain. My father in the 1960s would get his shoulder bruised all black and blue from clay pigeon loads in a 12 ga shotgun. The recoil pads back then were hard as a rock. Get rid of those narrow and hard old recoil pads. __________________ The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
 July 2, 2013, 08:35 AM #10 Brian Pfleuger Moderator Emeritus   Join Date: June 25, 2008 Location: Western Colorado, finally. Posts: 19,118 If you handload and you MUST start with that rifle, get some Trail Boss and load it per IMRs instructions. Much better, would be to start with a 22 and progress to something like a 223 or 22-250 and then to a .243. If you're deer hunting, I'd stop at the 243 anyway but you could then progress to the 7-08. If you start at the 7-08, with any normal load, "reduced" recoil or not the young lady is not likely to enjoy shooting it. The Trail Boss loads would work great but the problem will still be "stepping up". The next step up would be significant recoil, comparatively. In any case, I'd absolutely start with a 22 if she doesn't shoot at all currently.
 July 2, 2013, 09:27 AM #11 Gbro Senior Member   Join Date: February 20, 2005 Location: Minnesota Posts: 2,072 Get her a good electronic ear muff. She will want to hear everything and gun report noise will cause a new shooter to loose interest in some cases before recoil. Good luck and have fun. I have a niece that is in Grad school coming in a week and she is looking forward to shooting again. She grew up in a home without firearms and is totally enjoying time with her cousins and GUNS And she will leave with a gun this time. __________________ Gbro CGVS For the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, But to us who are being saved, It Is The Power Of God. 1Corinthians 1-18
 July 2, 2013, 10:07 AM #12 jmr40 Senior Member   Join Date: June 15, 2008 Location: Georgia Posts: 8,542 Simply play around with some different options here. Look at loading manuals to get an idea of velocities and powder charges and plug in the numbers. http://www.handloads.com/calc/recoil.asp That way you will know instead of just guessing, or hoping internet advice is accurate. The wildcard that many don't consider is powder charge. Look around at load data and you will find that many powders will get equal velocity, with less powder. The powder charge has almost as much effect on recoil as bullet weight. Sometimes you can get 99% of the same speed with 10% less powder than you were using. That will often reduce recoil with virtually no loss in performance.
 July 2, 2013, 10:37 AM #13 Brian Pfleuger Moderator Emeritus   Join Date: June 25, 2008 Location: Western Colorado, finally. Posts: 19,118 The difference in recoil to a new shooter between any two relatively full power loads in a 7mm-08 is going to be about zero. On paper, light-bullets with light powder charges generally have less recoil. "Less" doesn't matter if it's still "harsh". Most new shooters, particularly small, young and/or meek, and not going to enjoy the recoil from a 7-08. Here's a calculation from QuickLoad: 139gr Hornady SP, 24" barrel max load Rl-17, 2,972 fps, recoil after gas effect, 15.39ft/lbs, momentum 87.62 lb.ft/s Same bullet, powder with 10% lower max charge, H4895, 2,907 fps (97.8%), recoil after gas effect, 14.02ft/lbs (91%), momentum 83.61 lb.ft/s (95%). That difference isn't going to matter one whit to a new shooter. Possibly, if you cut it down to a 110gr and went with a powder that maxes out about 10% lower charge than the highest velocity charges but still gets close to the same speed, which would be a 110gr Speer over IMR4895, you cut the recoil energy down to 7.98 (49% reduction) but the momentum is still 81.12, only an 8% reduction. Still, that load would be considerably more comfortable, taking out more than half the "punch" and leaving more of a "rolling" recoil. However, load a 139gr Hornady over a max load of Trail Boss and you get 2.46ft/lbs and 42.44 lb.ft/s, a reduction of 85% and 52%, respectively. That load would be entirely tolerable for even the smallest, most recoil averse shooters. __________________ Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza. --- The problem, as you so eloquently put it, is choice. -The Architect ----- He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose. -Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.
 July 2, 2013, 04:12 PM #14 NHSHOOTER Senior Member   Join Date: November 26, 2012 Location: Concord NH Posts: 673 The young lady in question is quite proficient with the 22 long rifle and she has already shot the 7-08 and isnt the least bit afraid of it, I am just looking for the softest recoil I can get for her so she can get some practice in. She is big for her age and weighs in at 110 lbs. I surely would not want to make her recoil shy, but she really wants to hunt deer and I have limited resources and cant really afford to go out and buy another rifle. I think she will do fine with the 7-08..
July 2, 2013, 05:20 PM   #15
JD0x0
Senior Member

Join Date: January 30, 2013
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
 Actually, if you use the same powder charge with a light bullet as you do a heavy, the light will have more recoil due to increased muzzle velocity (rep. energy). You have to drop the powder, too, if you want them to match.
I had thought it was the opposite. The heavier projectiles create more recoil because more mass is being pushed out the barrel.

That's why a .45-70 with a 630 grain bullet @ 1000fps will have more kick than a .243 win with a 58 grain bullet @4000 fps in an equal weight rifle.
The .243 using more powder and developing more muzzle energy.

 July 2, 2013, 05:21 PM #16 Dixie Gunsmithing Staff   Join Date: April 27, 2013 Location: Ohio Posts: 1,923 I agree with Clark on the soft pads. They feel a heck of a lot better to the shooter than the old red rubber beasts.
 July 2, 2013, 05:34 PM #17 Dixie Gunsmithing Staff   Join Date: April 27, 2013 Location: Ohio Posts: 1,923 JD0x0, Below is a good summary, quote: "The total momentum of a system is conserved if there are no outside forces acting on it. "Gun recoil results from conservation of total momentum of the bullet-gun system: the backward recoil gun momentum balances the forward bullet momentum to maintain zero total momentum. "Gun recoil actually has two parts: primary recoil from the escaping bullet and secondary recoil from the escaping gas behind the bullet". Essentially, the more momentum forward, the more reward. It works between mass and velocity. From: http://www.bsharp.org/physics/recoil and; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recoil
 July 2, 2013, 07:04 PM #18 BigD_in_FL Junior member   Join Date: December 20, 2012 Location: The "Gunshine State" Posts: 1,981 Sorry Clark - not grinding them to fit means the guns do not fit; and that makes no sense to me. I would prefer to have a gun that actually fits, especially a shotgun
July 2, 2013, 11:00 PM   #19
JohnKSa
Staff

Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 20,900
Quote:
 ...not grinding them to fit means the guns do not fit...
The "grind to fit" designation means that the pad is provided oversize and is meant to be ground to fit the gunstock so that there's no overlap of the pad to the stock. It has nothing to do with whether or not the gun fits the shooter.
__________________
Did you know that there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?

 July 2, 2013, 11:11 PM #20 Sarge Senior Member   Join Date: May 12, 2002 Location: MO Posts: 5,206 Hodgdon® H4895® REDUCED RIFLE LOADS for Youth Hunting, Informal Target and Plinking 7-08 Data in left column. __________________ May a person who is relocating out-of-State move firearms with other household goods? Yes. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/may-...ousehold-goods
July 3, 2013, 07:24 PM   #21
BigD_in_FL
Junior member

Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: The "Gunshine State"
Posts: 1,981
Quote:
 The "grind to fit" designation means that the pad is provided oversize and is meant to be ground to fit the gunstock so that there's no overlap of the pad to the stock. It has nothing to do with whether or not the gun fits the shooter.
I know that, but when you fit them to the gun, and they are still oversized, odds are they are not being properly placed in the shoulder pocket. Would be better to simply used a slip-on pad

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Hogan's Alley     Tactics and Training     Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum     Handguns: The Revolver Forum     Handguns: General Handgun Forum The Hide     The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action     The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics     The Art of the Rifle: General     The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum     NFA Guns and Gear     The Hunt The North Corral     Lock and Load: Live Fire Exercises     Competition Shooting     Curios and Relics     Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting The Skunkworks     Gear and Accessories     The Smithy     Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting         Bullet Casting     The Harley Nolden Memorial Institute for Firearms Research The Conference Center     General Discussion Forum         TFL Photo Contest     Law and Civil Rights         Legal and Political The Firing Line Gun Show     Retail Deals and Feedback Forum Support     Site Questions and Tech Support (NO FIREARMS QUESTIONS)     Software and Function Testing

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.

 -- vBulletin 3 ---- vBulletin 3 - variable fonts ---- Low profile (unsupported) Forum Home Page - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2016 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.20046 seconds with 9 queries