June 28, 2012, 03:35 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
|
Guns of the Confederacy
An interesting article popped up in my daily deluge of email from Gun Digest:
http://www.gundigest.com/article/joh...b-and-his-guns It's a little excessively peppered with "Johnny Reb", but a good read, nonetheless.
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae |
June 28, 2012, 11:12 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2010
Location: Orygun
Posts: 868
|
That was a joy to read even with all the "Johnny Rebs".
__________________
With over 15 perCUSSIN' revolvers, I've been called the Imelda Marcos of cap & ball. SASS#3302 (Life), SASS Regulator, NRA (Life), Dirty Gamey Bastards #129 Wolverton Mtn. Peacekeepers (WA), former Orygun Cowboy (Ranger, Posse from Hell) |
June 29, 2012, 10:27 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: Weekend cowboy
Posts: 542
|
I wanted to use JHNNYREB as my license plate, but it wouldn't look right on a cab-unit design, streamlined EuroCargo semitractor.
Now maybe if I had a Peterbilt or Kenworth PS- The Confederacy never built any Model 1858s with brass frames. Only a few copies of 1851s were made using bronze, and these were not too combat-sturdy. |
June 29, 2012, 03:30 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 11, 2012
Location: mid michigan
Posts: 196
|
I believe they were brass framed. And even at the end of the war, the Rebs had to turn to wrought iron, because they couldn't make any more brass. So the last guns the Rebs made were iron, when they ran out of brass
|
June 29, 2012, 05:07 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
Guns in the day including Colt's were made from wrought iron. The brass used in Confederate guns was red brass or gunmetal which was bronze with a high copper content. Colt nor Remington made any brass framed guns.
|
June 30, 2012, 09:45 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2011
Posts: 156
|
Certainly a good read. I googled a few guns mentioned in that article, Kerr revolver look pretty neat.
|
July 11, 2012, 02:00 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2010
Posts: 241
|
Wait. You people are saying Rem never made brass guns? I had heard that Rem made brass guns and they were more much common than non-brass to the extent that non-brass Rem 58s were held in high value.
Have I been taught wrong since I was little, or am I missing something? |
July 11, 2012, 03:00 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
|
Well, I don't know about never, but the 1858 was a steel-framed gun. They weren't made of brass because they didn't need to be - the North had no particular shortage of iron, so there was no need to substitute "inferior" metal.
One of the easiest ways to answer the question is to compare the number of original brass framed Remingtons to the number of original steel framed Remingtons. If brassers were common, you'd see them turn up here and there. Since they don't, it seems safe to say that there either weren't any made or there were so few made as to not really matter. It seems to me that the whole brass-framed guns, the so-called "Confederate" guns, are, for the most part, an Italian invention. It's my opinion that they saw the Griswold and Gunnison as a copy of the Colt Navy and ran with the idea that anything brass framed was Confederate. There were plenty of steel and iron framed Confederate revolvers - and plenty of them were Colts. Sam was making revolvers well before the war started.
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae |
July 11, 2012, 06:16 PM | #9 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
Quote:
Quote:
There were a few companies in the South that made brass framed .36 caliber revolvers but quantities were usually very few. No brass frames were made in .44 caliber. The Italians, especially Pietta count on nobody knowing or caring enough about history. Uberti started out with brass framed guns but are more history conscious now. Some of the guns Pietta makes that actually existed like Police models are historically incorrect using the wrong size frames and number of chambers. The Colt 51 Navy was never offered in the Army caliber of .44 Last edited by Hawg; July 11, 2012 at 06:23 PM. |
||
July 18, 2012, 09:50 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2007
Location: Hudson, Florida
Posts: 1,135
|
Quote:
No, "you were taught wrong" on how to use proper specifics as to Remington revolver model when you make such a wide sweeping incorrect statement as that. Your above quote is not an accurate statement as you wrote it, since you did not specify an "1858" Remington. So either your information is incorrect or you were lacking in not giving specifics in that particular statement of yours as to which percussion model Remington. At any rate, that particular above sentence as you wrote it is totally incorrect. Remington did in fact manufacture their percussion .31 caliber spur trigger pocket revolver nicknamed "Baby Remington" with a brass frame as well as a steel frame. That makes a brass frame Remington a historical fact. .
__________________
"This is my Remy and this is my Colt. Remy loads easy and topstrap strong, Colt balances better and never feels wrong. A repro black powder revolver gun, they smoke and shoot lead and give me much fun. I can't figure out which one I like better, they're both fine revolvers that fit in my leather". "To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target". Last edited by Bill Akins; July 19, 2012 at 12:08 AM. |
|
July 18, 2012, 10:00 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2007
Location: Hudson, Florida
Posts: 1,135
|
Quote:
.
__________________
"This is my Remy and this is my Colt. Remy loads easy and topstrap strong, Colt balances better and never feels wrong. A repro black powder revolver gun, they smoke and shoot lead and give me much fun. I can't figure out which one I like better, they're both fine revolvers that fit in my leather". "To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target". Last edited by Bill Akins; July 18, 2012 at 10:06 PM. |
|
July 18, 2012, 10:32 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
Quote:
|
|
July 18, 2012, 10:46 PM | #13 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 6, 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,080
|
Hello, everyone. I have read where the southern gunmakers tried twisting iron bar stock in an efffort to strengthen it for revolver cylinders, due to the scarcity of quality steel. This didn't work, as there were reports of burst cylinders. Has anyone came across such a twisted cylinder revolver? I know some forging flow patterns become visible on older firearms..I wonder if it would be on these?
|
July 19, 2012, 12:00 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2007
Location: Hudson, Florida
Posts: 1,135
|
Quote:
We only know what you write. Not what you're thinking. .
__________________
"This is my Remy and this is my Colt. Remy loads easy and topstrap strong, Colt balances better and never feels wrong. A repro black powder revolver gun, they smoke and shoot lead and give me much fun. I can't figure out which one I like better, they're both fine revolvers that fit in my leather". "To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target". Last edited by Bill Akins; July 19, 2012 at 12:15 AM. |
|
July 19, 2012, 12:14 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
Whatever Bill. You made your point. It's all good.
|
July 19, 2012, 11:13 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 186
|
I just read and let the history buffs have at it. I've had a lot of fun over the years with some find not so pc pistols though. Thinks Hardcase for the post. It's a good read.
|
July 25, 2012, 03:55 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2004
Location: Ft. Lewis/Tacoma, WA.
Posts: 1,034
|
Good article.
I have read the article and enjoyed it, despite the excessive colloqiuailisms. There was one brass frame revolver that saw regular Confederate service, the Spiller and Burr revolver. It shared many visual similarities with the '58 Remington. There is a good image and description of the revolver in Echoes of Glory; Arms and Equipment of the Confederacy.
__________________
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to others and I expect the same from them." - John Wayne |
July 25, 2012, 09:21 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
Actually, the Spiller & Burr .36 was a copy of the Whitney .36. The Whitney had an iron frame.
Original Spiller & Burr |
July 25, 2012, 11:49 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
|
Quote:
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce |
|
July 28, 2012, 04:04 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2004
Location: Ft. Lewis/Tacoma, WA.
Posts: 1,034
|
@ Pohill
Pohill,
Thanks for the correction/ clarification. I appreciate learning new things and stand quite corrected.
__________________
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to others and I expect the same from them." - John Wayne |
July 28, 2012, 07:00 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
The Spiller & Burr .36 and Whitney .36 are similiar to the Remington-Beals .36.
|
July 28, 2012, 07:26 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
Not similar enough to be mistaken for one.
|
July 28, 2012, 09:23 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
Still similiar...
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|