The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 23, 2009, 07:01 PM   #26
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
Noslers' BT was designed for long range after velocity has dropped off--in big game calibers. There have been reports of bullet being destructive at close ranges' higher velocities.

I've always been a 150 Sierra Sptz. type fella' myself, for deer sized critters, but I loaded some 30-'06 150 gr. Nosler BT's for a friend, who likes that bullet, at about 2800fps. That's fairly moderate, and closer to .308 velocity. Pleasant to shoot.

He and his partners have used this ammo on antelope and deer, over several seasons, and they performed vary well (not too destructive) from fairly close range out to moderately long range. Also an accurate bullet, and good for testing a rifle to get a feel for it's accuracy potential.:

In Varmint calibers, they are, of course, rather destructive as designed.

Last edited by Nnobby45; September 23, 2009 at 07:16 PM.
Nnobby45 is offline  
Old September 23, 2009, 07:36 PM   #27
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,206
I've been loading the 30/150/BT over H4895 powder in the 30-06 for years; use in here in MO where you're unlikely to trip over anything big, inclined to eat/stomp you. I get 2940 fps and it shoots a shade over 1 MOA from Peg's old 78 Remington, with its old Tasco 4X scope. I suspect with a good clear 9+ scope it would be capable of substantially better- but she's used to it, likes it and shoots it well. A smart man don't go triflin' with the Princess's rifle, unless he's asked

A couple of seasons ago I saw a decent 8 point buck trailing some does around, about 350 yards from the house. That old 78 was the closest rifle to the door so I ran in and grabbed it, along with a couple of the aforementioned Nosler BT loads. When the buck showed himself again in a drywash, just his neck & leading shoulder were unobstructed and the bullet went in right where they meet. Even at 210+ yards it sounded like you hit a watermelon with a baseball bat...put him in a heap and he never moved.

My friends who load the BT report similar results. It wrecks more meat than some others but ruined meat means little when you lose the whole animal. I stand convinced that it just might be the best bullet available for broadside shots at thin-skinned game, to about 350 pounds.
May a person who is relocating out-of-State move firearms with other household goods? Yes.
Sarge is offline  
Old September 23, 2009, 07:40 PM   #28
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,135
I am curious about reports of BTs blowing up at close ranges....Anyone that has had that happen please chime in : Where did you hit the deer, with what caliber and bullet weight?

I've yet to recover a single BT/ CT/ Accutip from any deer ( 25 + deer over the past 8 years ) at ranges from 10 yards to 200+. All were broadside complete penetrations. even at close ranges they haven't " blown up " and have completely penetrated in all the calibers that I have used - even the relatively light 95 grainers in a .243 win..

I'd like to hear more about the failures that people have had with them
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
mikejonestkd is offline  
Old September 23, 2009, 09:03 PM   #29
Junior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 11
I've used 165 gr BT in 30-06 reloads for several years with very good accuracy. They have been consistent performers on deer.
JimM is offline  
Old September 24, 2009, 07:40 AM   #30
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Posts: 341

About the delayed reply here. The cartridge in question is a 7mm-08. I tried the 140 grain and the 150 grain ballistic tips. They grouped about the same, maybe the 140's were slightly better.

I appreciate all the reponses here. I don't want to sound like a whinner, but I am a bit confused now. Reading the the replies I have figured out one of three things is going to happen if I shoot a deer with my 7mm-08 using 140 grain ballistic tips.

1. The deer will drop dead where it stands.

2. I will loose half my venison due to bullet damage.

3. The deer will run off and die slowly and suffer greatly.

Maybe I should try some other projectiles.
Bella is offline  
Old September 24, 2009, 11:16 AM   #31
Wild Bill Bucks
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2005
Location: Southeastern Oklahoma, Next door to Sasquatch
Posts: 1,266

Out of the 29 readable posts that have been posted: 19 are for the bullet,3 are against the bullet, and 7 are mostly info posts.

If this were the presidential election, the yea's would have it.

I would load em up and go.
Wild Bill Bucks is offline  
Old September 24, 2009, 02:43 PM   #32
Junior member
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Posts: 600
I would never use a BT on a hog and on the deer,,,Its all about bullet placement. Not on the shoulder. Hornady light mag is a BT for the 7x57? hornady does use a SST that works well, abit tougher bullet. I have had both recoverd case's of BT but only if hit middle lung/heart. Had some both low and hit hits that blow off chuncks of backbone and above or low heart shoots that did the same when hit a bit low. But deer did not move in either case ,well exect to hit the ground. Now the ct and accutip are different enought to be in a different group. More like the sst.
Bella if you don't make a bad shoot nothing will drop a deer quicker than a BT and the 140gr in 7-08 is a great choice. Just put that bullet in the heart/lung area and it's down.
hardluk1 is offline  
Old September 24, 2009, 05:19 PM   #33
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2008
Posts: 260
I have used them in my 270win.That said they killed the deer,But the hole was as big as my fist going out.They will work if you don't get to speedy with them.Your milage may vary!Good Luck
plainsman456 is offline  
Old September 24, 2009, 08:56 PM   #34
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 5,306
It is a great choice in a 7-08.A very tiugh bullet ,designed for a 7mag,might just punch through.

There is a fine point,here.If you choose to shoot the shoulder,you have heavy bone and meat to go through,and you will trash a lot of meat.I ,personally,do not think the shoulder is a good target on a deer.Ribs,just behind the foreleg.Right behind them,heart ,lungs.

Big magnums and over 3000 fps tears up meat.Trust me,experiences like hitting shoulder on antelope with a 7 rem mag helped me discover the .257.

I'll guess youll get a path of destruction about like a football,maybe more.

A 140-150 gr BT in a 7-08 is about as good as it gets.
HiBC is offline  
Old September 24, 2009, 10:23 PM   #35
Join Date: September 23, 2009
Location: helena montana
Posts: 81
i shot 180 grain ballistic tips out of my 338 federal and at 100 yards i put a hole in one side of a whitetail 338 caliber and the other side...... well lets just say that not much was left in a basketball size area.... they are good for stopping things in their tracks
murphyboy88 is offline  
Old September 24, 2009, 11:39 PM   #36
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 304
good choice for me, love the 130 gr NBT in my 270 win. Been keeping the freezer full for years with it, almost all deer droped in their tracks. As far as the shoulder shots, i have no clue why this is considerd a good shot, theirs no vitals their, wait for the right shot and put it where it belongs. No problems. Ive never lost an animal with them so far, but i wait for good shots and dont take potshots just to hit the animal. longest was out to 340 yards. Shot a buck, dropped him right their, then 20 min later my freind i was hunting with shot a doe about 10 feet from the buck, ( with my rifle)she also dropped in her tracks.... yummy!!!
bullspotter is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 11:48 AM   #37
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2000
Posts: 247
30-06 150 gr NBT's
300 Win Mag 150 gr NBT's (simply because it is lazerlike in accuracy)
30-30 125 gr NBT's in super 14" contender
25-06 100 gr NBT's

All of the above have killed multiple deer & hogs. They are very accurate and kill like a lightening bolt as far as I'm concerned. Meat loss is inconsequential.

None, however, were used on really, heavy bodied game.
critter44 is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 03:57 PM   #38
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2007
Location: Northern Ky
Posts: 253
Used Layne Simpsons loads in the 7mmSTW when it was still a wildcat. 86 gr of H1000, 140gr NBT. Velocity was 3425fps 12 ft from the muzzle. Killed a buck at 265yds and when I opened him up it looked like a grenade went off. have killed quite a few whitetails with the STW and the Nosler, no problems, no excessive meat damage, but I always shoot for the lung shot when I can. Also killed a caribou in northern Quebec with my 7mag and the 140gr NBT...66 gr of RL 19. Velocity 3050fps 12 feet from the muzzle, duplicating the Rrem factory 140gr load. Penetration was great, actually through and through with a great exit hole. both rifles are Rem 700's. The STW has a custom Douglas 26" stainless steel air guaged barrel, and the 7mag one of the originals with a 24" stainless barrel. Other deer I have seen not shot in the lung/rib areas were quite messy.
thekyrifleman is offline  
Old September 27, 2009, 02:37 PM   #39
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2008
Location: pa.
Posts: 1,879
i use 57grs of imr 4350 with the 165gr nosler bt bullet in my 760 and 7600 rem pump 18 inch barreled carbines,with that load the speed is 2700fps and i,ve killed over 30 deer with it here in pa., most shot thru the lungs and they die very quickly with no meat wasted. and they shoot into 2 inches or better and 100yds from a rest. thats all i use for deer. eastbank.
eastbank is offline  
Old September 27, 2009, 04:07 PM   #40
James R. Burke
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2009
Location: U.P. of Mich/Quinnesec
Posts: 1,897
I load them for a friend in a 7mm mag, and they all worked great for him. I use the Nosler partition for my 30-06, and my wifes .243 for deer. I just feel better with the partitions on deer, but like I said that is all my freind use's he as dropped on the spot everything he has shot at.
James R. Burke is offline  
Old September 29, 2009, 04:54 PM   #41
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2007
Posts: 1,173

I've been using 120gr. BTs @ 3000 fps in a 7-08 for years. I started more than 15 years ago so I know some were the 'old type'. They weren't available in a factory load back then and that's one of the reasons I started handloading metallics. I've never felt like they wasted more meat than any other bullet and none of my deer ran more than 30 yds. most just fell over DRT. I wouldn't hesitate to load up with them and go hunting tomorrow.

FWIW - I usually try for double lung broadside shots but I've also taken shoulder shots and I love these bullets.
To a much greater extent than most mechanical devices, firearms are terribly unforgiving of any overconfidence, complacency or negligence.
lockedcj7 is offline  
Old September 30, 2009, 06:43 AM   #42
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2009
Location: Yale MI
Posts: 163
I've has a few negative experiences with NBT's, but it could just be due to my application and prefrences. I've shot (and killed) numerous whitetail deer with Win. factort NBT loads in my .300WM. Two stand out as negative IMO. About 80 yards broadside shot in the ribs, bullet failed to exit. Saw the deer drop about 25 yards away though. Poor blood trail. Second was about 65 yards quartering to me, shot went into right side, failed to exit, no blood trail. There was a light mist and I couldn't find deer. Found it the next AM by accident as I was driving along the trail. It went maybe 40 yards. I lost a good buck from a shot at 50 yards due to no blood trail. Quartering towards, good lung shot, no exit or blood trail. I prefer good blood trail and full penetration due to the heavy brush I hunt in. I think the bullet/gun combo in my case causes the NBT to open up too quickly and reduces penetration. It shoots identical to the Accubond, so that's what I shoot now. I would not hesitate shooting it at distance through my .300, but I don't have that range in the area I hunt.
Flapjack23 is offline  
Old September 30, 2009, 10:42 PM   #43
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Location: Oklahoma/Kansas
Posts: 89
I hunt with a choice of 3 rifles. Ruger M77 in 30.06, with Federal Premium 165gr. NBT--Savage 110 in 30.06, with Federal Premium 165gr. NBT and Hornady 165gr. SST--Remington 700 SPS in .308 with Federal Premium 150gr. NBT. All these rifles are "dead nutz" zero at 300yds. 9 years- 23 white tails, 5 mule deer, 5 pronghorn, 4 elk, 2 moose, 2 black bear, too many ferel hogs to count, and all these critters fell over dead bang with "ballistic tip rounds." They make a mess of where ever they hit,, without a doubt. Depending on the circumstances, I try to take one of three shots. 1. low behind the front leg (turns the heart and lungs to pudding) 2. high behind the front shoulder (done right it severs the spine-- ya loose some backstrap with this one) 3. neck shot. If your rifle "likes" a certain ballistic tip round, then by all means use it. Its a confidence thing that you need with your rifle,, and remember--their may be 10,000 guys on this forum, and all of them have probably taken game of some sort,, but not one of them has taken "your shot' with "your rifle". You have a rifle and a round that you have confidence in-- then go for it and never look back--just my 2cents.
"Normal "is just a setting on your dryer.
gkdir is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2017 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09177 seconds with 9 queries