|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 17, 2009, 10:21 PM | #26 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 109
|
"promote the general welfare"
Quote:
Original question: Quote:
I assume that we would face a little short term choas if we severly limited the authority of the commerce clause, but we would regain a lot of rights and freedom by doing so. |
||
June 17, 2009, 10:51 PM | #27 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
ftd, I believe you are confusing the phrase of the preamble with how the phrase from the end of Article I section 8 clause 1 has been used:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; The underlined portion above, has been abused since it was penned. National Bank? the general welfare clause was used. Luisiana Purchase? National Forests, et al, the general welfare clause. The power to tax was given for 2 purposes: To pay the debts of the U.S. To provide for the common defense and general welfare of the U.S. In context, the U.S. is the central government, not the citizens (the people) of a nation. |
June 18, 2009, 11:28 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 109
|
Antipitas,
Thanks for the correction. I usually read the whole Constitution before commenting on it, as it gets smokey for me between what it actually says and what I think it says. I was lazy this time and appreciate you fixing my error. |
|
|