The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

AK103K · July 22, 2010, 07:39 PM

I have two Seecamp LWS32's, an LCP, and I had a Kel Tec P32. I've had the Seecamps the longest, and never had one problem with either. Both are accurate (and at distances you would not normally expect), and reliable.

I just got the LCP a little over a week ago, but with around 300 rounds through it so far, its been just like the Seecamps, so it looks promising. The little nubs for sights are nice, but not really necessary. The trigger isnt bad either.

I got my Kel Tec when they first came out, and it wasnt very reliable or accurate. It had feeding issues, as well a problem with the hammer not "letting off" when the trigger was pulled. I didnt keep it long.

As far as size and weight, the Seecamp is smaller, and felt weight doesnt seem to be much different than the LCP. Comparing the quality of the two, its kind of like comparing an old VW Beetle to a BMW. Both work, but ones definitely a little classier.

July 22, 2010, 07:39 PM	#8
AK103K Senior Member Join Date: May 1, 2001 Posts: 10,223	I have two Seecamp LWS32's, an LCP, and I had a Kel Tec P32. I've had the Seecamps the longest, and never had one problem with either. Both are accurate (and at distances you would not normally expect), and reliable. I just got the LCP a little over a week ago, but with around 300 rounds through it so far, its been just like the Seecamps, so it looks promising. The little nubs for sights are nice, but not really necessary. The trigger isnt bad either. I got my Kel Tec when they first came out, and it wasnt very reliable or accurate. It had feeding issues, as well a problem with the hammer not "letting off" when the trigger was pulled. I didnt keep it long. As far as size and weight, the Seecamp is smaller, and felt weight doesnt seem to be much different than the LCP. Comparing the quality of the two, its kind of like comparing an old VW Beetle to a BMW. Both work, but ones definitely a little classier.