The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

Bolinger · October 8, 2013, 02:39 AM

I agree, have used Fobus holsters for year with no issue. They are strong and lightweight. I have a paddle holster for my HK USP like this one http://www.actiongear.com.au/56-fobu...e-holster.html and I also have the double stack dual mag 6900 http://www.actiongear.com.au/55-fobu...e-holster.html For guys doing undercover or CPP work, I find they work well, but are really fast to draw when you need to. Black hawk has a CQC Holster as well that I have seen, and had a thumb lock on it, which I thought was built well as well and had added protection of a locking catch. At this stage Im happy with the Fobus, both for Glock, USP and a browning.

October 8, 2013, 02:39 AM	#12
Bolinger Junior Member Join Date: October 7, 2013 Posts: 7	I agree, have used Fobus holsters for year with no issue. They are strong and lightweight. I have a paddle holster for my HK USP like this one http://www.actiongear.com.au/56-fobu...e-holster.html and I also have the double stack dual mag 6900 http://www.actiongear.com.au/55-fobu...e-holster.html For guys doing undercover or CPP work, I find they work well, but are really fast to draw when you need to. Black hawk has a CQC Holster as well that I have seen, and had a thumb lock on it, which I thought was built well as well and had added protection of a locking catch. At this stage Im happy with the Fobus, both for Glock, USP and a browning.