The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

teeroux · June 11, 2009, 07:14 AM

Well one argument could be is that would he have died anyway without the second string of fire?

Reguardless of when or how many times he was shot after the fact if he was dead or would have died shooting him again would not cause him to die again and could possibly only have caused him to die faster.

I don't think that he should have shot him again but IMO the procecution should prove beyond doubt that he may have lived if not shot a second time.

June 11, 2009, 07:14 AM	#38
teeroux Senior Member Join Date: December 12, 2006 Posts: 1,512	Well one argument could be is that would he have died anyway without the second string of fire? Reguardless of when or how many times he was shot after the fact if he was dead or would have died shooting him again would not cause him to die again and could possibly only have caused him to die faster. I don't think that he should have shot him again but IMO the procecution should prove beyond doubt that he may have lived if not shot a second time.