It proves that there are times when people are attacked by multiple aggressors; that it is not a fantasy; it is a reality. The anti's main argument is that high capacity mags are not needed for self defense, and are only useful for attacking innocent crowds. This proves their argument is wrong.
It also proves that he & his dad, together, would have had enough ammo to shoot each attacker at least once, without reloading.
It also proves that he & his dad, together, would not have had enough ammo to shoot each attacker at least once, without reloading.
Do we prepare for what will only definitely happpen, or do we prepare for what could possibly happen, to the best of our planning? I choose the latter...