Quote:
It's a success but most guns are rubbish
|
Agree with your sarcasm on asserted "success."
- Australia overall reduces guns, and greatly reduces the number and proportion that are semi auto: homicide rate goes down 54% since 1990's peak
- US overall increases guns, and increase the number and proportion that are semi auto: US Homicide rate goes down 58% since 1990's peak
Two polar opposite changes in amounts and types of guns, same effect. Where I come from that means the asserted casualty is absurd.
So the question is not: what did both Australia and the US do that was different? The valid question is: what did they do that was the same?
Answer: They both substantially (x to 3x) increased imprisonment/incarnation rates since the 1990's.