The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - .44 mag vs. .223 effectiveness in a carbine

444 · June 22, 2001, 12:47 AM

"Energy isn't everything. The 223 creates a large, permanent stretch cavity from the high-velocity hydrostatic shock that the .44 does not."
I certainly don't buy that.

June 22, 2001, 12:47 AM	#6
444 Senior Member Join Date: November 20, 2000 Location: Ohio Posts: 3,968	"Energy isn't everything. The 223 creates a large, permanent stretch cavity from the high-velocity hydrostatic shock that the .44 does not." I certainly don't buy that.