I remember that case, in general. I don't know if her claim to having a "child in common" with the cop has yet been thrashed out in court, (is that claim the basis of her perjury charge??) but at the time the news made it public, it seemed that "child in common" was her opinion that since the cop shot her son, they had a "child in common" because of that.
I'm sure she believes that to be the case, but the rest of us think of it somewhat differently.
Thanks for the update, seems she isn't "playing nice" in the court system, still...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
|