View Single Post
Old May 12, 2019, 09:25 AM   #33
44 AMP
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 19,667
Your post is kind of babbling and I am not sure what you are talking about.
What I'm babbling about was my quest to understand this statement..
Out of the 44.6 people, 7 of them had wounds that would have been survivable had they had there been level 1 trauma care available.
I did not know what level 1 trauma care was, nor where it was available. This made me wonder, WHY level 1 care was not available to those 7 people who "would have survived" if it had been. Based on what I found out, it seems the most likely answer to that question is that level 1 care was too far away, and the victims simply didn't live long enough to get there.
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Page generated in 0.03173 seconds with 8 queries