View Single Post
Old May 12, 2019, 09:25 AM   #33
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 19,667
Quote:
Your post is kind of babbling and I am not sure what you are talking about.
What I'm babbling about was my quest to understand this statement..
Quote:
Out of the 44.6 people, 7 of them had wounds that would have been survivable had they had there been level 1 trauma care available.
I did not know what level 1 trauma care was, nor where it was available. This made me wonder, WHY level 1 care was not available to those 7 people who "would have survived" if it had been. Based on what I found out, it seems the most likely answer to that question is that level 1 care was too far away, and the victims simply didn't live long enough to get there.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03173 seconds with 8 queries