View Single Post
Old July 8, 2009, 04:18 PM   #114
mavracer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,209
Quote:
Go back and read your own question again. You were basically asking me to read Kuenzli's mind
NO I did not I very clearly stated MAY and COULD

Quote:
the standard is would a reasonable person believe that Fish's life was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm based on Kunezli's actions
yes and this is all you get to go on,you don't get that he never actually laid a hand on anybody only that Mr Fish as a reasonable man belived it.
Quote:
I say no based on what I have read. In fact, the more I read about it and how Kuenzli acted during his previous blowups the more I think Fish was not in danger and overreacted to Kuenzli's bizarre but not deadly behavior.
Here is where you must concede that you may be wrong because you don't know Mr. Kuenzli's intentions toward Mr. Fish.
Quote:
Apparently another group of people called ajury agreed.
Only because a Judge didn't explain that Kuenzli could have been guilty of aggrivated assault without touching Fish.
and it's mavracer I ride the harley, race the maverick.
__________________
rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6
Quote:
originally posted my Mike Irwin
My handguns are are for one purpose only, though...
The starter gun on the "Fat man's mad dash tactical retreat."
mavracer is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03386 seconds with 8 queries