View Single Post
Old May 4, 2011, 12:02 AM   #10
secret_agent_man
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 25, 2011
Posts: 463
Another totally bass ackwards decision by the Ninth Circus Court of Idiots Savant.

Have not read the case yet, so I don't know if the Ninth addressed the issue of degree of scrutiny applicable. Doesn't sound like it, however.

They should have taken a more frontal approach, is a significant public interest served by the ban. If not, the ban is unconstitutional. SCOTUS will spit this one right back in their face.

The problem with the Ninth Circuit is there is not enough water left on the West Coast to flush those stupid yahoos down the nearest toilet.
secret_agent_man is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02534 seconds with 8 queries