View Single Post
Old May 11, 2012, 03:39 PM   #25
Conn. Trooper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 530
[IIf the police agree to allowing an "embedded" reporter, they should not be allowed to after-the-fact cherry pick what the reporter is allowed to report. If the police don't wish to be videotaped engaging in egregious violations of civil (and human) rights, they shouldn't engage in egregious violations of civil (and human) rights.][/I]

I think what he means is not violations of rights, rather sensitive police info. Like how they go about disarming a bomb, or something that they don't want everybody to know. Like the face of a CI or undercover officer.
Conn. Trooper is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03783 seconds with 8 queries