Quote:
|
If someone is allowed to kick down a door/break into someone's house because they were insulted,
|
I do not see any evidence in the article of the door being "kicked down."
The only reference to the door that is an actual quote simple says the door "flew open."
If the shooting victim had previous residence there, has a child on the premises, and has until this time been allowed access to the home he did not break in.
The shooter knew the victim and stated he did not consider him a physical threat. Why did that suddenly change?